Background Various observations have suggested that the course of COVID-19 might be less favourable in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases receiving rituximab compared with those not receiving rituximab. We aimed to investigate whether treatment with rituximab is associated with severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases.Methods In this cohort study, we analysed data from the French RMD COVID-19 cohort, which included patients aged 18 years or older with inflammatory rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases and highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19. The primary endpoint was the severity of COVID-19 in patients treated with rituximab (rituximab group) compared with patients who did not receive rituximab (no rituximab group). Severe disease was defined as that requiring admission to an intensive care unit or leading to death. Secondary objectives were to analyse deaths and duration of hospital stay. The inverse probability of treatment weighting propensity score method was used to adjust for potential confounding factors (age, sex, arterial hypertension, diabetes, smoking status, body-mass index, interstitial lung disease, cardiovascular diseases, cancer, corticosteroid use, chronic renal failure, and the underlying disease [rheumatoid arthritis vs others]). Odds ratios and hazard ratios and their 95% CIs were calculated as effect size, by dividing the two population mean differences by their SD. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04353609.

Whipple disease (WD) is a rare infectious systemic disease. Rheumatologists are at the frontline of WD diagnosis due to the early rheumatological manifestations. An early diagnosis is crucial, as usual anti-rheumatic drugs, especially TNF inhibitors, may worsen the disease course. We conducted a retrospective multicentre national study from January 2010 to April 2020 to better characterize the rheumatological features of WD. Classic WD (CWD) was defined by positive periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) staining of a small-bowel biopsy sample, and non-CWD (NCWD) was defined by negative PAS staining of a small-bowel biopsy sample but at least one positive Tropheryma whipplei (TW) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for a digestive or extradigestive specimen. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled, including 11 CWD patients. Twenty patients (30%) received TNF inhibitors during the WD course, with inefficacy or symptom worsening. More digestive symptoms and systemic biological features were observed in CWD patients than in NCWD patients, but both patient groups had similar outcomes, especially concerning the response to antibiotics and relapse rate. Stool and saliva TW PCR sensitivity were both 100% for CWD and 75% for NCWD and 89% and 60% for small-bowel biopsy sample PCR, respectively. WD encountered in rheumatology units has many presentations, which might result from different pathophysiologies that are dependent on host immunity. Given the heterogeneous presentations and the presence of chronic carriage, multiple TW PCR tests on samples from specific rheumatological sites when possible should be performed, but samples from nonspecific digestive and extradigestive sites also have great value.

Background: Calcific tendinitis of the rotator cuff is a frequent cause of shoulder pain. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous lavage (UGPL) is an effective treatment, but factors associated with good clinical and radiological outcomes still need to be identified. Purpose: To study the clinical, procedural, and radiological characteristics associated with improved shoulder function and the disappearance of calcification on radiograph after UGPL. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of the CALCECHO trial, a double-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted on 132 patients. The trial assessed the effect of corticosteroid injections after UGPL, and patients were randomly assigned to receive either corticosteroid or saline solution in the subacromial bursa. We analyzed all patients included in the randomized controlled trial as 1 cohort. We collected the patients’ clinical, procedural, and radiological characteristics at baseline and during follow-up (3, 6, and 12 months). Univariable analysis, followed by multivariable stepwise regression through forward elimination, was performed to identify the factors associated with clinical success (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand [DASH] score <15) or the disappearance of calcification. Results: Good clinical outcomes at 3 months were associated with steroid injections after the procedure (odd ratio [OR], 3.143; 95% CI, 1.105-8.94). At 6 months, good clinical evolution was associated with a lower DASH score at 3 months (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.890-0.956) and calcium extraction (OR, 10.7; 95% CI, 1.791-63.927). A lower DASH at 6 months was also associated with a long-term favorable outcome at 12 months (OR, 0.939; 95% CI, 0.912-0.966). Disappearance of calcification at 3 and 12 months occurred more frequently in patients in whom communication was created between the calcification and the subacromial bursa during the procedure (OR, 2.728 [95% CI, 1.194-6.234] at 3 months; OR, 9.835 [95% CI, 1.977-48.931] at 12 months). Importantly, an association between calcification resorption and good clinical outcome was found at each time point. Conclusion: Assessing patients at 3 months seems to be an essential part of their management strategy. Calcium extraction and creating a communication between the calcific deposits and subacromial bursa are procedural characteristics associated with good clinical and radiological evolution.

Objective. To evaluate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound examination of the major salivary glands (US-SG) according to the 2019 OMERACT US scoring system for Sjogren's syndrome (SS).Methods. This was a retrospective study based on a multicentric cohort of SS/sicca syndrome. ACR/EULAR 2016 (≥ 4 without OSS), AECG 2002 and clinician experts were considered as reference standards for SSdiagnosis. An OMERACT score ≥ 2 according to 2 independent readers defined the diagnosis of SS based on US-SG assessment. Diagnostic performances and Inter-observer reproducibility of US-SG were assessed.Results. Forty-two patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR 2016 criteria for SS were compared to 30 controls with sicca syndrome. Twenty-five patients were diagnosed with SS according to US-SG evaluation, they were more frequently included in the SS group (52.5%) than in controls (10.0%) (p < 0.001). US-SG showed AUC of 0.751 (0.621-0.882) for the diagnosis of SS (ACR/EULAR 2016 classification). The inclusion of USSG in the ACR/EULAR 2016 classification improved Se (91.5% vs 89.4%) with limited decrease of Sp (96.0% vs 100%) and with an AUC of 0.975 (0.945-1.00). Similar results were observed when USSG was included in the AECG 2002 classification. Inter-observer reproducibility of the 2019 OMERACT US scoring ≥ 2 for SS diagnosis was good (k =0.73 (0.64-0.81)). Histological lymphocyte infiltration of the minor salivary glands was associated with the OMERACT grading of US-SG. Conclusion.This study confirms the good specificity of the 2019 OMERACT US classification of US-SG for the diagnosis of SS and its feasibility in daily practice.