A high frequency of latex sensitization and allergy was demonstrated in Hospital General de Mexico surgery residents, which indicates the need for policies and procedures to be developed for health workers with latex allergy, as well as continuous training of employees on latex allergy.
Tolerance induction and desensitization in Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) or in toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) have been described as an absolute contraindication by some authors, but there are cases where there is no treatment alternative. Tuberculosis (TB) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in developing countries and ranks alongside HIV as a leading cause of death worldwide. Severe drug reactions, such as SJS and TEN, occurring in these individuals are lifethreatening. Since alternative therapies for TB are limited, the role of desensitization and reintroduction becomes essential. We describe a case of tolerance induction to anti-TB drugs in a patient with SJS/TEN overlap syndrome using a specifically designed premedication, comedication, and desensitization protocol.
Antecedentes: Las reacciones de hipersensibilidad perioperatorias constituyen un problema de salud mundial, con una incidencia estimada de uno por cada 100 000 procedimientos y una tasa de mortalidad de 0.1 a 9 %. Los principales factores de riesgo son antecedentes de alergia a otros fármacos, atopia, trastornos psiquiátricos asociados y cirugías previas.Objetivos: Determinar la frecuencia de sensibilización y tipo de medicamentos implicados en la alergia perioperatoria en un hospital de tercer nivel, durante tres años.Método: Estudio retrospectivo, transversal, descriptivo de alergia perioperatoria corroborada mediante pruebas cutáneas a cada medicamento y al látex, de pacientes atendidos en el Servicio de Alergia e Inmunología Clínica del Hospital General de México.Resultados: Se incluyeron 28 pacientes con el diagnóstico de alergia perioperatoria. Los principales desencadenantes fueron los bloqueadores neuromusculares (46.42 %), el látex (28.52 %) y el propofol (14.28 %). El principal factor de riesgo fue el antecedente de cirugías previas (89.28 %). En su mayoría, las reacciones de alergia perioperatoria fueron leves (71.42 %) y se presentaron en el periodo posoperatorio (60.71 %).Conclusiones: El diagnóstico y tratamiento iniciales siempre deberán efectuarse por el médico anestesiólogo o el cirujano, enfocados en el retiro de los posibles agentes causales.
Non-allergic rhinitis with eosinophilic syndrome is considered to be a highly underdiagnosed disease owing to the lack of in vivo nasal tests' performance; to this underestimation, incorrect nasal etiology and lack of local in vivo tests (nasal specific IgE) are added, which warrants a high degree of diagnostic suspicion by the specialist physician.
Background: Papular urticaria is a chronic allergic reaction induced by insect bites. In México the most common causative arthropods reported are bed bugs, fleas and mosquitoes. Approximately 70% of people who are bitten by Cimex Lectularius (C. Lectularius) experience hypersensitive reactions, papular urticaria, extensive erythema, urticaria, and even anaphylaxis has been reported, Pruritus is the major complaint, impairing quality of life and sleep. Immunotherapy has been used in mosquito bite papular urticaria resulting in improvement of skin lesions and possibly protecting against reactions to subsequent exposures to mosquitoes.Methods: Children, 4-10 years of age, with recurrent papular urticaria due to bedbugs not responsive to multiple treatments were included. An initial allergy assessment included clinical history, skin prick test (SPT), and specific IgE sensitisation was performed to confirmed bedbug sensitization. Twenty children were randomized to receive subcutaneous specific immunotherapy (SSI) with whole body bed bug extract or conventional treatment. The treatment was carried out over twelve months and the response was assessed using the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQ), the immunotherapy satisfaction questionnaire (ESPIA questionnaire) and the 12-Item Pruritus Severity Scale (12-IPSS). The results from both the treated and control groups were compared. Results:The twenty patients were randomized, 12 to receive immunotherapy and 8 to receive conventional treatment for 12 months. Quality of life improved with a reduction in the DLQI score of 19.83 in the immunotherapy group versus 9 in the conventional treatment group (p=.03). Itch improved with a reduction in the 12-IPSS of 16.5 in the immunotherapy group versus 9.63 in the conventional treatment group (p=0.02). After twelve months of treatment, all 12 patients who received immunotherapy, reported a decrease of persistent cutaneous lesions but the 8 on conventional treatment did not. A mean score of 95.75 (SD 3.3) was recorded for satisfaction with immunotherapy.Conclusions:. Patients with papular urticaria by C. lectularius receiving allergen immunotherapy for 1 year showed a significant improvement compared with baseline and patients receiving conventional treatment regarding skin lesions, quality of life impairment, intensity of pruritus and satisfaction with immunotherapy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.