We compared the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA blot analysis (DBA) for detecting clonal T-cell populations and investigated whether a nonradioactive PCR method could be used in routine clinical diagnosis. We analyzed DNA from 117 cases for T-cell clonality by PCR amplification. DBA was performed on 77 of these cases. Denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PCR-PAGE) of radiolabeled PCR products and capillary electrophoresis (PCR-CE) of fluorescently labeled PCR products were used for PCR product separation and quantitation. Complete agreement was obtained between PCR-PAGE and DBA in 67 of 77 cases. One case was positive by DBA and negative by PCR-PAGE, and 3 cases were positive by PAGE and negative by DBA. Five cases indeterminate by DBA were positive by PCR-PAGE, and 1 indeterminate case was negative by PCR-PAGE. In the comparison of PCR-PAGE and PCR-CE, of 63 cases with height ratios less than 2.0, all were negative by PCR-PAGE. Of 52 cases with height ratios of 2.0 or more, 50 were positive by PCR-PAGE. We conclude that PCR-CE is analytically equivalent to DBA and PCR-PAGE for detecting clonal T-cell populations. The PCR-CE method is semiquantitative and, therefore, may be more objective than gel-based methods.
Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) of childhood most commonly follows gastrointestinal infection with Escherichia coli O157:H7. This pathogen elaborates Shiga toxins that are believed to cause microvascular injury and to trigger a thrombogenic response. The exact mechanisms leading to variable disease manifestations are unknown. Allelic variation in genes encoding selected coagulation factors and inhibitors of fibrinolysis were examined to determine whether or not a causal relationship exists between hypercoagulability and the development of HUS. No correlation between the thrombogenic factor V (G1691A), factor II (G20210A), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (C677T), or the plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1 promotor (4G/5G) genotypes and the risk of infection with E. coli O157:H7, or the risk of development of HUS among infected patients, was found. Serum PAI-1 levels did not correlate with the PAI-1 genotype. We conclude that the alleles studied are not major risk factors for the acquisition of E. coli O157:H7 infection, or of E. coli O157:H7-related HUS.
Objectives.—To review the state of the art relating to elevated hemostatic factor levels as a potential risk factor for thrombosis, as reflected by the medical literature and the consensus opinion of recognized experts in the field, and to make recommendations for the use of specific measurements of hemostatic factor levels in the assessment of thrombotic risk in individual patients.
Data Sources.—Review of the medical literature, primarily from the last 10 years.
Data Extraction and Synthesis.—After an initial assessment of the literature, key points were identified. Experts were assigned to do an in-depth review of the literature and to prepare a summary of their findings and recommendations. A draft manuscript was prepared and circulated to every participant in the College of American Pathologists Conference XXXVI: Diagnostic Issues in Thrombophilia prior to the conference. Each of the key points and associated recommendations was then presented for discussion at the conference. Recommendations were accepted if a consensus of the 27 experts attending the conference was reached. The results of the discussion were used to revise the manuscript into its final form.
Conclusions.—Consensus was reached on 8 recommendations concerning the use of hemostatic factor levels in the assessment of thrombotic risk in individual patients. Detailed discussion of the rationale for each of these recommendations is presented in the article. This is an evolving area of research. While routine use of factor level measurements is not recommended, improvements in assay methodology and further clinical studies may change these recommendations in the future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.