We compared the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and DNA blot analysis (DBA) for detecting clonal T-cell populations and investigated whether a nonradioactive PCR method could be used in routine clinical diagnosis. We analyzed DNA from 117 cases for T-cell clonality by PCR amplification. DBA was performed on 77 of these cases. Denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PCR-PAGE) of radiolabeled PCR products and capillary electrophoresis (PCR-CE) of fluorescently labeled PCR products were used for PCR product separation and quantitation. Complete agreement was obtained between PCR-PAGE and DBA in 67 of 77 cases. One case was positive by DBA and negative by PCR-PAGE, and 3 cases were positive by PAGE and negative by DBA. Five cases indeterminate by DBA were positive by PCR-PAGE, and 1 indeterminate case was negative by PCR-PAGE. In the comparison of PCR-PAGE and PCR-CE, of 63 cases with height ratios less than 2.0, all were negative by PCR-PAGE. Of 52 cases with height ratios of 2.0 or more, 50 were positive by PCR-PAGE. We conclude that PCR-CE is analytically equivalent to DBA and PCR-PAGE for detecting clonal T-cell populations. The PCR-CE method is semiquantitative and, therefore, may be more objective than gel-based methods.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.