During the past decade there has been a substantial advance in our understanding of estrogen signaling both from a clinical as well as a preclinical perspective. Estrogen signaling is a balance between two opposing forces in the form of two distinct receptors (ERα and ERβ) and their splice variants. The prospect that these two pathways can be selectively stimulated or inhibited with subtype-selective drugs constitutes new and promising therapeutic opportunities in clinical areas as diverse as hormone replacement, autoimmune diseases, prostate and breast cancer, and depression. Molecular biological, biochemical, and structural studies have generated information which is invaluable for the development of more selective and effective ER ligands. We have also become aware that ERs do not function by themselves but require a number of coregulatory proteins whose cell-specific expression explains some of the distinct cellular actions of estrogen. Estrogen is an important morphogen, and many of its proliferative effects on the epithelial compartment of glands are mediated by growth factors secreted from the stromal compartment. Thus understanding the cross-talk between growth factor and estrogen signaling is essential for understanding both normal and malignant growth. In this review we focus on several of the interesting recent discoveries concerning estrogen receptors, on estrogen as a morphogen, and on the molecular mechanisms of anti-estrogen signaling.

The biological actions of estrogens are mediated by estrogen binding to one of two specific estrogen receptors (ERs) ERalpha and ERbeta, which belong to the nuclear receptor superfamily, a family of ligand-regulated transcription factors. ERalpha and ERbeta are products of different genes and exhibit tissue- and cell-type specific expression. The characterization of mice lacking ERalpha, or ERbeta, or both has revealed that both receptor subtypes have overlapping but also unique roles in estrogen-dependent action in vivo. Additionally, ERalpha and ERbeta have different transcriptional activities in certain ligand, cell-type, and promoter contexts. Both receptors, however, are coexpressed in a number of tissues and form functional heterodimers. The biological roles of ERalpha /beta heterodimers in the presence of each respective homodimer are unknown. When coexpressed, ERbeta exhibits an inhibitory action on ERalpha -mediated gene expression and in many instances opposes the actions of ERalpha. A number of ERalpha and ERbeta isoforms have also been described, many of which alter estrogen-mediated gene expression. Uncovering the molecular mechanisms regulating the expression of both ERs, and how ERalpha and ERbeta directly or indirectly affect each other's function are paramount to understanding the cellular and biological events of estrogen-mediated gene regulation in normal and diseased tissues.

The estrogenic activities of bisphenol A (BPA) and its major metabolite BPA glucuronide (BPA-G) were assessed in a number of in vitro and in vivo assays. BPA competed with [3H]-17beta-estradiol (E2) for binding to mouse uterine cytosol ER, a glutathione S-transferase (GST)-human ER D, E, and F domain fusion protein (GST-hERalphadef) and full-length recombinant hERbeta. The IC(50) values for E2 were similar for all three receptor preparations, whereas BPA competed more effectively for binding to hERbeta (0.96 microM) than to either mouse uterine cytosol ER (26 microM) or GST-hERalphadef (36 microM). In contrast, BPA-G did not competitively displace [3H]E2 from any of the ER preparations. In MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with Gal4-hERalphadef or Gal4-hERbetadef, BPA induced reporter gene activity with comparable EC(50) values (71 and 39 microM, respectively). No significant induction of reporter gene activity was seen for BPA-G. Cotreatment studies showed that concentrations of (10 microM) BPA and BPA-G did not antagonize E2-induced luciferase mediated through either Gal4-hERalphadef or Gal4-hERbetadef. In vivo, the uterotropic effect of gavage or subcutaneous (sc) administration of 0.002-800 mg of BPA/kg of body weight/day for three consecutive days was examined in immature rats. Dose-related estrogenic effects on the rat uterus were observed at oral doses of 200 and 800 mg/kg and at sc doses of 10, 100, and 800 mg/kg. These results demonstrate that BPA competes more effectively for binding to ERbeta, but induces ERalpha- and ERbeta-mediated gene expression with comparable efficacy. In contrast, BPA-G did not exhibit any in vitro estrogenic activity. In addition, there was a clear route dependency on the ability of BPA to induce estrogenic responses in vivo.

ADP-ribosylation, a modification of proteins, nucleic acids and metabolites, confers broad functions, including roles in stress responses elicited for example by DNA damage and viral infection and is involved in intra-and extracellular signaling, chromatin and transcriptional regulation, protein biosynthesis and cell death. ADP-ribosylation is catalyzed by ADPribosyltransferases, which transfer ADP-ribose from NAD + onto substrates. The modification, which occurs as mono-or poly-ADP-ribosylation, is reversible due to the action of different ADPribosylhydrolases. Importantly, inhibitors of ADP-ribosyltransferases are approved or are being developed for clinical use. Moreover, ADP-ribosylhydrolases are being assessed as therapeutic targets, foremost as anti-viral drugs and for oncological indications. Due to the development of novel reagents and major technological advances that allow the study of ADP-ribosylation in unprecedented detail, an increasing number of cellular processes and pathways are being

Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) is a ligand-activated transcription factor that mediates the toxic activity of many environmental xenobiotics. However, its role in innate immune responses during viral infection is not fully understood. Here we demonstrate that constitutive AHR signaling negatively regulates the type I interferon (IFN-I) response during infection with various types of virus. Virus-induced IFN-β production was enhanced in AHR- IFN-I-mediated innate response and, further, suggests that the AHR-TIPARP axis is a potential therapeutic target for enhancing antiviral responses.AHR was originally discovered as a xenobiotic sensor that mediates the toxicity of the persistent environmental contaminant, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), more commonly known as dioxin [1][2][3][4] . Activation of AHR induces its target genes, including those encoding cytochrome P4501A1, cytochrome P4501B1, AHR repressor, TCDD-inducible poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (TIPARP) and aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A3 (refs. 1,2,5-9), which are involved in the adaptive metabolism of xenobiotic compounds. This property of AHR has been implicated in host defense against bacterial infection, as certain bacterial pigmented virulence factors are AHR agonists that are subsequently metabolized by AHR-regulated drug-metabolizing enzymes 10 . Studies of AHR-deficient mice have identified important physiological roles for AHR in response to endogenous ligands in cell cycle regulation, cell differentiation and immune responses 8,[11][12][13][14] . In relation to this, several putative endogenous ligands for the AHR have also been reported, including heme metabolites, arachidonic acids or leukotrienes and tryptophan metabolites, such as 6-formylindolo(3,2-b)carbazole (FICZ) and kynurenine (Kyn) 2,8,15 .There has been increased interest in understanding the role of AHR in immunity.Several reports, most of which are based mainly on experiments with dioxin treatment, have shown that the AHR is involved in the differentiation and/or function of T cells, macrophages and dendritic cells 7,9,11,[16][17][18][19][20][21] . AHR has been implicated in the control of acute graft-versus-host disease and autoimmunity 11,12,21 . Dioxin-activated AHR also reduces the survival rate of mice infected with influenza A virus 22,23 and indirectly suppresses the proliferation and differentiation of virus-specific CD8 + T cells via its regulatory role in dendritic cells 24 . FICZ and dioxin diminish CD8 + T cell responsiveness, whereas dioxin, but not FICZ, affects neutrophil recruitment or pulmonary inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) induction in response to influenza virus infection 25 .Tryptophan metabolites such as Kyn are upregulated during inflammation and/or tumor progression in several types of immune and tumor cells through the catalytic activity of tryptophan dioxygenase (TDO) and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), which catalyze the first step in the formation of Kyn from tryptophan 2,9 . This increase in Kyn leads to an increase in regulatory T c...

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-inducible poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (TiPARP/ARTD14) is a member of the PARP family and is regulated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR); however, little is known about TiPARP function. In this study, we examined the catalytic function of TiPARP and determined its role in AHR transactivation. We observed that TiPARP exhibited auto-mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase activity and ribosylated core histones. RNAi-mediated knockdown of TiPARP in T-47D breast cancer and HuH-7 hepatoma cells increased TCDD-dependent cytochrome P450 1A1 (CYP1A1) and CYP1B1 messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels and recruitment of AHR to both genes. Overexpression of TiPARP reduced AHR-dependent increases in CYP1A1-reporter gene activity, which was restored by overexpression of AHR, but not aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator. Deletion and mutagenesis studies showed that TiPARP-mediated inhibition of AHR required the zinc-finger and catalytic domains. TiPARP and AHR co-localized in the nucleus, directly interacted and both were recruited to CYP1A1 in response to TCDD. Overexpression of Tiparp enhanced, whereas RNAi-mediated knockdown of TiPARP reduced TCDD-dependent AHR proteolytic degradation. TCDD-dependent induction of AHR target genes was enhanced in Tiparp−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts compared with wildtype controls. Our findings show that TiPARP is a mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase and a transcriptional repressor of AHR, revealing a novel negative feedback loop in AHR signalling.

Using chromatin immunoprecipitation assays, we studied the 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)-mediated recruitment of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and several coregulators to the CYP1A1 promoter. AhR displayed a time-dependent recruitment, reaching a peak at 75 min and maintaining promoter occupancy for the remainder of the time course. Recruitment of AhR was followed by TIF2/SRC2, which preceded CBP, histone H3 acetylation, and RNA polymerase II (RNAPII). Simultaneous recruitment to the enhancer and the TATA box region suggests the formation of a large multiprotein complex bridging the two promoter regions. Interestingly, estrogen receptor ␣ (ER␣) displayed a TCDD-and time-dependent recruitment to the CYP1A1 promoter, which was increased by cotreatment with estradiol. Transfection in HuH7 human liver cells confirmed previously reported ER␣ enhancement of AhR activity. In contrast, TCDD did not induce the recruitment of ER␣ to the estrogen-responsive pS2 promoter, and after 120 min of cotreatment with estradiol, ER␣ is still present on the CYP1A1 promoter but no longer at pS2. RNA interference studies with T47D cells support a role for ER␣ in TCDD-dependent CYP1A1 expression. Our data suggest that ER␣ acts as a coregulator of AhR-mediated transcriptional activation and that the recruitment of ER␣ by AhR represents a novel mechanism AhR-ER␣ cross talk.

No abstract