The invasion paradox describes the co-occurrence of independent lines of support for both a negative and a positive relationship between native biodiversity and the invasions of exotic species. The paradox leaves the implications of native-exotic species richness relationships open to debate: Are rich native communities more or less susceptible to invasion by exotic species? We reviewed the considerable observational, experimental, and theoretical evidence describing the paradox and sought generalizations concerning where and why the paradox occurs, its implications for community ecology and assembly processes, and its relevance for restoration, management, and policy associated with species invasions. The crux of the paradox concerns positive associations between native and exotic species richness at broad spatial scales, and negative associations at fine scales, especially in experiments in which diversity was directly manipulated. We identified eight processes that can generate either negative or positive native-exotic richness relationships, but none can generate both. As all eight processes have been shown to be important in some systems, a simple general theory of the paradox, and thus of the relationship between diversity and invasibility, is probably unrealistic. Nonetheless, we outline several key issues that help resolve the paradox, discuss the difficult juxtaposition of experimental and observational data (which often ask subtly different questions), and identify important themes for additional study. We conclude that natively rich ecosystems are likely to be hotspots for exotic species, but that reduction of local species richness can further accelerate the invasion of these and other vulnerable habitats.

One Sentence Summary: Empirical evidence from grasslands around the world demonstrates a humped-back relationship between plant species richness and biomass at the 1 m 2 plot scale.Abstract: One of the central problems of ecology is the prediction of species diversity. The humped-back model (HBM) suggests that plant diversity is highest at intermediate levels of productivity; at low productivity few species can tolerate the environmental stresses and at high productivity a small number of highly competitive species dominate. A recent study claims to have comprehensively refuted the HBM. Here we show, using the largest, most geographically diverse dataset ever compiled and specifically built for testing this model that if the conditions are met, namely a wide range in biomass at the 1 m 2 plot level and the inclusion of plant litter, the relationship between plant biomass and species richness is hump shaped, supporting the HBM. Our findings shed new light on the prediction of plant diversity in grasslands, which is crucial for supporting management practices for effective conservation of biodiversity. 4Main Text: The relationship between plant diversity and productivity is a topic of intense debate (1-6). The HBM states that plant species richness peaks at intermediate productivity, taking above-ground biomass as a proxy for annual net primary productivity (ANPP) (7-9). This diversity peak is driven by two opposing processes; in unproductive and disturbed ecosystems where there is low plant biomass, species richness is limited by either stress, such as insufficient water and mineral nutrients, or high levels of disturbance-induced removal of biomass, which few species are able to tolerate. In contrast, in the low disturbance and productive conditions that generate high plant biomass it is competitive exclusion by a small number of highly competitive species that is hypothesized to constrain species richness (7-9). Other mechanisms proposed to explain the unimodal relationship between species richness and productivity include disturbance (10), evolutionary history and dispersal limitation (11,12), and density limitation affected by plant size (13).Different case studies have supported or rejected the HBM, and three separate meta-analyses reached different conclusions (14). This inconsistency may indicate a lack of generality of the HBM, or it may reflect a sensitivity to study characteristics including the type(s) of plant communities considered, the taxonomic scope, the length of the gradient sampled, the spatial grain and extent of analyses (14,15), and the particular measure of net primary productivity (16). Although others would argue (6), we maintain that the question remains whether the HBM serves as a useful and general model for grassland ecosystem theory and management. 5 We quantified the form and strength of the richness-productivity relationship using novel data from a globally-coordinated (17), distributed, scale-standardized and consistently designed survey, in which plant richness and biomass were m...

The effect of species diversity on ecosystem productivity is controversial, in large part because field experiments investigating this relationship have been fraught with difficulties. Unfortunately, there are few guidelines to aid researchers who must overcome these difficulties and determine whether global species losses seriously threaten the ecological and economic bases of terrestrial ecosystems. In response, I offer a set of hypotheses that describe how diversity might influence productivity in plant communities based on three well‐known mechanisms: complementarity, facilitation, and the sampling effect. Emphasis on these mechanisms reveals the sensitivity of any diversity‐productivity relationship to ecological context (i.e., where this relationship should be found); ecological context includes characteristics of the surrounding environment, temporal and spatial scales of observation, and the intensity of human management. In particular, the legitimacy of the sampling effect as a mechanism of productivity enhancement is dependent upon the degree to which stochastic events influence immigration and extinction processes in a given ecosystem. A mechanistic approach also requires that the three mechanisms be separated and quantified in diversity experiments, and I examine the most appropriate analyses for doing so, focusing on the overyielding technique. Finally, I question why productivity per se is a relevant management concern in non‐agricultural systems once relationships among diversity, productivity, and the qualities of the surrounding environment are considered.

The phenology of growth in temperate deciduous forests, including the timing of leaf emergence and senescence, has strong control over ecosystem properties such as productivity and nutrient cycling, and has an important role in the carbon economy of understory plants. Extended leaf phenology, whereby understory species assimilate carbon in early spring before canopy closure or in late autumn after canopy fall, has been identified as a key feature of many forest species invasions, but it remains unclear whether there are systematic differences in the growth phenology of native and invasive forest species or whether invaders are more responsive to warming trends that have lengthened the duration of spring or autumn growth. Here, in a 3-year monitoring study of 43 native and 30 non-native shrub and liana species common to deciduous forests in the eastern United States, I show that extended autumn leaf phenology is a common attribute of eastern US forest invasions, where non-native species are extending the autumn growing season by an average of 4 weeks compared with natives. In contrast, there was no consistent evidence that non-natives as a group show earlier spring growth phenology, and non-natives were not better able to track interannual variation in spring temperatures. Seasonal leaf production and photosynthetic data suggest that most non-native species capture a significant proportion of their annual carbon assimilate after canopy leaf fall, a behaviour that was virtually absent in natives and consistent across five phylogenetic groups. Pronounced differences in how native and non-native understory species use pre- and post-canopy environments suggest eastern US invaders are driving a seasonal redistribution of forest productivity that may rival climate change in its impact on forest processes.

Climate shifts over this century are widely expected to alter the structure and functioning of temperate plant communities. However, long-term climate experiments in natural vegetation are rare and largely confined to systems with the capacity for rapid compositional change. In unproductive, grazed grassland at Buxton in northern England (U.K.), one of the longest running experimental manipulations of temperature and rainfall reveals vegetation highly resistant to climate shifts maintained over 13 yr. Here we document this resistance in the form of: (i) constancy in the relative abundance of growth forms and maintained dominance by longlived, slow-growing grasses, sedges, and small forbs; (ii) immediate but minor shifts in the abundance of several species that have remained stable over the course of the experiment; (iii) no change in productivity in response to climate treatments with the exception of reduction from chronic summer drought; and (iv) only minor species losses in response to drought and winter heating. Overall, compositional changes induced by 13-yr exposure to climate regime change were less than short-term fluctuations in species abundances driven by interannual climate fluctuations. The lack of progressive compositional change, coupled with the long-term historical persistence of unproductive grasslands in northern England, suggests the community at Buxton possesses a stabilizing capacity that leads to long-term persistence of dominant species. Unproductive ecosystems provide a refuge for many threatened plants and animals and perform a diversity of ecosystem services. Our results support the view that changing land use and overexploitation rather than climate change per se constitute the primary threats to these fragile ecosystems.calcareous grassland ͉ climate manipulation ͉ global change ͉ multivariate analysis ͉ vegetation