2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001.930318.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The influence of species diversity on ecosystem productivity: how, where, and why?

Abstract: The effect of species diversity on ecosystem productivity is controversial, in large part because field experiments investigating this relationship have been fraught with difficulties. Unfortunately, there are few guidelines to aid researchers who must overcome these difficulties and determine whether global species losses seriously threaten the ecological and economic bases of terrestrial ecosystems. In response, I offer a set of hypotheses that describe how diversity might influence productivity in plant com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
304
5
4

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 286 publications
(325 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
(120 reference statements)
12
304
5
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports the hypothesis that greater functional diversity can lead to facilitation or complementarity (Hooper 1998, Fridley 2001, Hooper and Dukes 2004. Although the ideas of complementarity and facilitation have traditionally been discussed in the context of mixtures of species (Fridley 2001), there is no reason to think that these same relationships might not also apply to mixtures of cultivars of the same species with physical, physiological, and phenological differences (Newton et al 2009). Our data suggest that as Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This supports the hypothesis that greater functional diversity can lead to facilitation or complementarity (Hooper 1998, Fridley 2001, Hooper and Dukes 2004. Although the ideas of complementarity and facilitation have traditionally been discussed in the context of mixtures of species (Fridley 2001), there is no reason to think that these same relationships might not also apply to mixtures of cultivars of the same species with physical, physiological, and phenological differences (Newton et al 2009). Our data suggest that as Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The nonlinear response of biovolume to SR implies different underlying mechanisms along the SR gradient. There is ample research pointing to positive species interactions (complementarity or facilitation) and sampling effect (the likelihood that a highly productive species is a member of the community) as the mechanisms driving the positive relationship between biomass and SR (Fridley 2001;Loreau et al 2001;Tilman et al 2001;Hooper et al 2005).We are not aware of any observation on biomass or productivity decline at higher SR and consequently of any theoretical work on the nature of such a relationship. We hypothesize that negative species interactions, involving increased competition due to niche overlap, govern the dynamics of species-rich communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…RYT Ͼ 1 indicates complementarity. RYT was originally proposed as the most appropriate measure of niche complementarity (35) and is one of the most common metrics for assessing overyielding (27). It is a robust measure when planting densities give constant final yield, sufficient time has been allowed for interactions to develop, and indices are calculated on a yield per area basis rather than as yield per individual (21,36,37).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Facilitation may also be important: direct positive interactions have been demonstrated in many experiments (26). However, the main mechanism addressed in biodiversityproductivity experiments so far is nutrient enrichment by nitrogen fixers (27). Assessing the performance of individual species is crucial for understanding which mechanisms are responsible for the positive effect of diversity on productivity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%