There is evidence that infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae is associated with asthma of recent onset and that it can influence the severity of asthma. This has led to the suggestion that macrolide antibiotics may be useful in the treatment of asthma in subjects infected with C. pneumoniae. This study examined the association between immunoglobulin (Ig)G and IgA titres to C. pneumoniae and the severity of asthma.IgG and IgA antibodies to C. pneumoniae were measured in 619 subjects with asthma (18±60 yrs), using the microimmunofluoresence method. Subjects were asked about their use of asthma medicines, symptoms, previous hospitalization for asthma, smoking status and age of onset of asthma. In subjects with IgG titres of $1:64 and/or IgA titres $1:16 (n=212), spirometry was performed and peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and symptoms were recorded twice daily for 4 weeks on a diary card.The use of high dose inhaled steroids was associated with an increase of 74.1% in the titre of IgG antibodies (p=0.04) and an increase of 70.6% in the titre of IgA antibodies (p=0.0001) when compared with the use of low dose inhaled steroids. There was an inverse association between IgG antibodies and forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) as a percentage of predicted in those subjects with elevated IgG and/or IgA (p=0.04). In this group IgA antibodies were also associated with a higher daytime symptom score (p=0.04).Higher titres of antibodies to Chlamydia pneumoniae appears to be associated with markers of asthma severity. This raises the possibility that chronic infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae leads to an increase in the severity of asthma. Studies aimed at eradicating chronic infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae are necessary to determine whether or not this is the case. Eur Respir J 2000; 15: 254±259.

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to analyze the safety and effectiveness of stenting using partially covered self-expandable stents in palliation of dysphagia in patients with unresectable esophageal cancer.MethodsRetrospective analysis of hospital records of all patients who underwent esophageal stenting in the period 2008–2015 was performed. The study included patients with unresectable esophageal and esophagogastric cancer.ResultsThere were 442 patients included. Mean age was 56 years (range 28–89), and 379 were males. In 40 (9.0%) patients, stenting was performed in the cervical, in 150 (39.3%)—in the middle thoracic, in 141 (31.9%)—in lower thoracic esophagus and in 111 (25.1%)—in the esophagogastric junction. Stenting resulted in significant alleviation of dysphagia grade (3.0 vs. 1.0, p = 0.00001). During the follow-up, 55 (12.4%) patients experienced recurrent dysphagia due to tumor or granulation tissue overgrowth, and in 18 (4.1%) patients, migration of the stent occurred, for which an independent risk factor was adjuvant chemo- and/or radiation therapy (p = 0.001). Minor complications included chest pain (54.5%), delayed complete stent expansion (12.0%), feeling of a foreign body (25.3%), hiccup (1.6%), gastroesophageal reflux (45.6%) and post-discharge pneumonia (2.5%). A feeling of a foreign body in the esophagus was significantly more common after stenting of the cervical esophagus (p = 0.0001), and hiccup was more common after stenting of the esophagogastric junction (p = 0.02). Major complications included bleeding (1.3%), respiratory insufficiency (0.7%), esophageal perforation (0.9%) and irregular heartburn (2.3%). Overall procedure-related mortality was 0.4%. The median survival time was 117.8 days (range 2–732).ConclusionsStenting is an effective procedure in relieving dysphagia in patients with unresectable malignant esophageal stenosis and is associated with low rate of postoperative and long-term complications.

Nonsuction drainage is more effective than suction drainage with regard to drainage volume, drainage duration, and incidence of persistent air leakage. However, it is associated with a higher incidence of asymptomatic residual air spaces.

An apparent exception to the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma carcinogenetic pathway is the so-called "de novo" carcinoma which has no evidence of adenoma in its vicinity. Despite the fact that they are often quite small, these lesions appear to be more aggressive (i.e., greater likelihood of lymph-node metastases) than carcinomas that clearly arise from surrounding adenomas exadenoma carcinoma. The purpose of the present comparative immunohistochemical study was to compare rates of cell adhesion molecule (E-cadherin) and protease [stromelysin-3 (ST-3)] expression in groups of de novo (n=64) and ex adenoma (n=42) lesions in order to see whether their more aggressive behavior is associated with decreased cell adhesion and increased protease expression. The rates of extensive ST-3 expression and decreased E-cadherin expression were significantly higher in the de novo group (P=0.014 and 0.005, respectively). Histopathologically, the de novo group also had a significantly higher percentage of cases with an infiltrative invasion pattern. These differences highlight the more aggressive phenotype of the de novo colorectal carcinoma and fit with their greater invasive potential.

IntroductionThe close anatomical relationship between the oesophagus and bronchial tree results in formation of an oesophago-respiratory fistula in a subset of patients with advanced oesophageal or lung cancer. In those patients stenting of both the oesophagus and tracheobronchial tree is a valid option of palliative treatment.AimTo determine the effectiveness, tolerance, quality of life, safety and survival after double stenting procedures.Material and methodsRetrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database was performed, concerning consecutive patients with oesophago-respiratory fistulas treated with double stenting. In all patients the degree of dysphagia, respiratory function before and after the procedure, and quality of life were evaluated. Partially covered oesophageal self-expanding metallic stents (PCESEMS) were used for oesophageal stenting, and silicone Y-type or partially covered self-expanding bronchial and tracheal stents (PCASEMS) were used to restore airway patency.ResultsBetween 2003 and 2015, 31 patients underwent double stenting due to oesophago-respiratory fistulas. Twenty-nine patients were diagnosed with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma and 2 with bronchial carcinoma. In all patients, improvement in the general condition and quality of life was observed after airway patency restoration. Two patients required mechanical ventilation due to respiratory failure immediately after the procedure. Seven patients with oesophageal fistulas died because of bleeding in the long-term follow-up. Four patients required endoscopic re-intervention. Mean survival time was 67.1 days.ConclusionsDouble stenting is an effective procedure improving patients’ quality of life. However, life-threatening complications can occur.

Advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus and gastroesophageal junction usually requires palliative treatment, and the method of choice is stenting. There are several types of stents currently available, including: self-expandable metallic stents (fully or partially covered); self-expandable plastic stents; biodegradable stents. Each of the mentioned stents has its advantages and limitations, and requires a proper, patient-tailored selection. Due to the close anatomical relationship between the oesophagus and bronchial tree, some patients may require bilateral stenting. Oesophageal stenting may not only be considered as a palliative procedure, but can also be implemented to alleviate dysphagia during preoperative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.

No abstract

Double and unilateral stenting is an effective measure to alleviate dysphagia and dyspnoea in patients treated with malignant oesophageal fistula. In those with airway stenosis of ≤30%, stenting of the oesophagus only, instead of DS, is a safe method of treatment.