The Constitutional Court as mandated in the constitution has a function as a guardian of the constitution, therefore, if there are norms in the Act that against to the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia can be done by a trial. The decision of the Constitutional Court in the trial of the Act is related to the formal and material aspects, then the verdict that has been fulfilled the legal considerations by the judge, it will become the basis of a decision. Therefore, the verdict can not revoked arbitrarily unless in making decision due to coercion or negligence. The thesis deals and focuses on two aspects: First, showing and analyzing the considerations of the Constitutional Court in deciding the case No.012-016-019 / PUU-IV / 2006, No.19 / PUU-V / 2017, No.37-39 / PUU-VIII / 2010, No.5 / PUU-IX / 2011, No.36 / PUU-XV / 2017. Second, explains why the Constitutional Court inconsistency in determining the status and legal position of the KPK (Corruption Eradication Commision) through its verdict. From the new latest verdict of the Constitutional Court said that the KPK is an independent state institution under the executive authority , it is different from the previous four Constitutional Court decisions which said KPK as an independent state institution.
This paper is intended to find out the comparison between Indonesian and South Korea constitutional court. Constitutional Court of Indonesia and South Korea have same authority, namely judicial review, the authority decide the disputes between state institutions and the dissolution of political parties. However, there are some differences. From the point of authority, Constitutional Court of Korea is more comprehensive because it has the constitutional complaint authority and in deciding the dispute of state institutions authority, the dispute type of the state institutions authority is classified explicitly. But from the point of judicial review execution, the constitutional court in Indonesia is more comprehensive because the applicant could be more flexible. Indonesian Constitutional Court should be able to adopt the excellence of Constitutional Court of Korea while maintaining it's excellence to maximize the Constitutional Court as escort agencies and interpreter of the Constitution.
Currently, spatial planning has been placed as one of the important components that will determine the success or failure of the development process of a region, especially in the context of the sustainable development process. On the other hand, population growth that is increasingly rapid from time to time ultimately creates an obligation for the government to regulate various facilities for the needs of human life. Through research conducted in a normative juridical manner, the research shows that spatial planning policy is one of the efforts in the context of realizing sustainable development. In line with that, the existence of law in any spatial planning will greatly determine the success or failure of the spatial planning policy itself. The urgency of spatial planning must be interpreted as the main agenda in the context of planning the development of a country or region. Spatial planning will greatly determine the progress of the development of a region. Thus, spatial planning policy must be seen as an instrument that can direct and build humans towards a better civilization in the future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.