Dietary patterns that involve a decrease in fat and an increase in fruit and vegetable (FV) intake have been suggested to decrease cancer risks. In this study, intervention methods to selectively modify dietary fat and/or FV intakes were developed. Compliance to the diets and the effects on body weight are shown, because both of these dietary changes can impact on and be confounded by changes in energy intake. A total of 122 women with a family history of breast cancer were randomized onto one of four diets for 12 mo. Counseling methods were devised to increase amount and variety of FV consumed with or without a decrease in fat intake using modified exchange list diets. Women on the low-fat and combination low-fat/high-FV diet arms decreased their fat intakes to approximately 16% of energy. Women on the high-FV and the combination low-fat/high-FV diet arms increased FV intakes to approximately 11 servings/day. Despite counseling efforts to maintain baseline energy intakes, mean body weight increased significantly by 6 pounds in women in the high-FV diet arm and decreased significantly by 5 pounds in women in the low-fat diet arm. Percent body fat also was increased in the high-FV diet arm and decreased in the low-fat diet arm. Body weight and percent body fat in the combination diet arm did not change significantly. Control of energy intake, therefore, appears to have been achieved only when the addition of FV to the diet was balanced by a decrease in fat intake and both dietary components were enumerated daily. Maintenance of energy intake, therefore, did not appear to be attained intrinsically when individuals were counseled to make changes in the composition of their diets.

Long-term (1 y) effects of dietary fat intake on lipoprotein metabolism were determined in 72 healthy women receiving either a 15%-fat diet (n = 34) or usual diet (n = 38). Every three months food records, weight, waist-hip ratio (W:H), percent body fat, fasting plasma triglyceride, cholesterol (C), high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), HDL2-C, and HDL3-C; apolipoprotein B and A-I, and postheparin lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and hepatic triglyceride lipase activities were determined. In one year, the low-fat-diet (LFD) group had 17% and the non-intervention-diet group had 36% dietary fat. The LFD group showed decreases in cholesterol: 7% TC, 13% low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and 8% HDL. Apolipoprotein A-I, decreased early. Apolipoprotein B did not change. Plasma triglyceride correlated with weight. Percent body fat and W:H correlated with the total and LDL-C. Changes in HDL-C and/or HDL2-C and LPL correlated directly with the changes in dietary fat and inversely with dietary carbohydrate. Changes in total-C or LDL-C correlated with the changes in weight and W:H, but not with the changes in nutrient intake.

No abstract

Dietary fat and energy intake have been implicated in breast cancer etiology. To examine the relative importance of these dietary factors on markers of cancer risk in women, we designed an intervention trial to selectively decrease fat and/or energy intake in free-living, premenopausal women who were somewhat overweight. The study used a 2 x 2 factorial design to evaluate the independent and interactive effects of dietary fat and energy. The diets were nonintervention, low fat (15% of energy from fat, maintenance of energy intake), low energy (25% energy reduction), and combination low fat and low energy. We utilized an individualized counseling approach with self-selection of foods. Women on the low-fat and combination diets were asked to meet given daily goals for fat grams and food group exchanges, while women on the low-energy diet used only food group exchanges. Of the 113 premenopausal women randomized who were eligible for analysis, 43% were African-American. A total of 88 women completed the 12-week program, and adherence to the dietary goals was similar in both racial groups. Women on the low-fat diet were able to reduce dietary fat intake to 19% of energy by 4 weeks and to 17% by 12 weeks with a slight decrease in energy intake. Women on the low-energy diet met their energy reduction goals by four weeks while maintaining percentage of energy from fat. Women on the combination diet largely met their goals by four weeks as well. These data indicate that it is possible to selectively manipulate dietary fat and energy intake in women over a short period of time, which makes clinical studies on the relative effects of these two dietary variables on cancer risk biomarkers readily feasible.

The low-fat, low-energy and combination diets all resulted in similar and statistically significant decreases in BMI, percent body fat and waist circumference over 12 weeks of intervention. The extent of weight loss, however, varied depending on baseline weight, and the combination diet was the only intervention to result in significant weight loss for women who were heavier at baseline. This indicates that, although there may be an advantage for reducing dietary fat in initially heavier women, any of these counseling strategies could be effective for improving anthropometric predictors of health risks associated with overweight status. This is useful since flexibility in dietary choices may facilitate adherence to dietary counseling in some individuals.