No abstract

UK National Institute for Health Research, Camelia Botnar Arterial Research Foundation.

The risk of rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm increases with aortic diameter. To obtain insight into the pathological processes associated with the vascular remodeling that accompanies aortic dilatation, we compared the histological features and the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) in biopsies from 21 small (4.0 to 5.5 cm in diameter) and 45 larger abdominal aortic aneurysms. The histological feature most clearly associated with enlarging aneurysm diameter was a higher density of inflammatory cells in the adventitia, P = .018. This inflammation was nonspecific, principally macrophages and B lymphocytes. Fibrosis of the adventitia provided compensatory thickening of the aortic wall as the aneurysm diameter increased. A combination of zymography and immunoblotting identified gelatinase A (MMP-2) as the principal metallogelatinase in small aneurysms, whereas zymography indicated an increasing activity of gelatinase B (MMP-9) in large aneurysms. Homogenates prepared from both small and large aneurysms had similar total activity against gelatin or type IV collagen. However, the concentration of gelatinase A, determined by immunoassay, was highest for small aneurysms: median concentrations, 385, 244, and 166 ng/mg protein for small aneurysms, large aneurysms, and atherosclerotic aorta, respectively. Immunolocalization studies indicated that gelatinase A was concentrated along fibrous tissue of both the acellular media and the atherosclerotic plaque. The recruitment of inflammatory cells into the adventitia, with subsequent elaboration of metalloproteinases, including gelatinase B, may contribute to the rapid growth and rupture of larger aneurysms.

No abstract

Rationale Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a complex disease with both genetic and environmental risk factors. Together, 6 previously identified risk loci only explain a small proportion of the heritability of AAA. Objective To identify additional AAA risk loci using data from all available genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Methods and Results Through a meta-analysis of 6 GWAS datasets and a validation study totalling 10,204 cases and 107,766 controls we identified 4 new AAA risk loci: 1q32.3 (SMYD2), 13q12.11 (LINC00540), 20q13.12 (near PCIF1/MMP9/ZNF335), and 21q22.2 (ERG). In various database searches we observed no new associations between the lead AAA SNPs and coronary artery disease, blood pressure, lipids or diabetes. Network analyses identified ERG, IL6R and LDLR as modifiers of MMP9, with a direct interaction between ERG and MMP9. Conclusions The 4 new risk loci for AAA appear to be specific for AAA compared with other cardiovascular diseases and related traits suggesting that traditional cardiovascular risk factor management may only have limited value in preventing the progression of aneurysmal disease.

Abstract-After successful surgical repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm, patients have for many years an increased risk of death from cardiovascular causes. We have tested the hypothesis that for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, the risk of nonaneurysm cardiovascular mortality before and after surgery increased with aneurysm diameter. Records of aneurysm repair or rupture and mortality were available from 2305 patients entered into the UK Small Aneurysm Trial and Study. Two hundred fifty-nine deaths occurred before aneurysm repair or rupture (mean follow-up 1.7 years), and 325 occurred after surgical repair (mean follow-up 3.6 years). The risk of nonaneurysm-related mortality and cardiovascular death before and after surgery increased with aneurysm diameter at baseline, even after adjustment for other known risk factors. The adjusted hazard ratios for cardiovascular mortality, per standard deviation (0.8-cm) increase in aneurysm diameter, were 1.34 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.79) and 1.31 (95% CI 1.06 to 1.63) in the periods before aneurysm repair or rupture and after aneurysm repair, respectively. The significant association between aortic diameter and cardiovascular mortality, excluding aneurysm-related deaths, suggests that aneurysm diameter is an independent marker of cardiovascular disease risk. Studies of late survival are often complicated by the unavailability of comprehensive follow-up data. Nevertheless, several recent studies have indicated that even after patients experience a full recovery from surgical repair, their survival appears to be worse than that in an age-and sex-matched population. [3][4][5][6] The population-based study from the Mayo clinic reported a 5-year survival of only 60% after repair of AAAs Ͼ5 cm in diameter compared with the expected survival of 77% of other age-and sex-matched community residents (PϽ0.01). 3 The majority of late deaths were from cardiovascular causes. The difference between the survival of patients undergoing surgery for small aneurysms (Ͻ5 cm in diameter) and other community residents was less marked and only of borderline significance (Pϭ0.05). 3 In a recent French study, the 5-year survival after aneurysm repair was reported as 72% compared with 90% in the age-and sex-matched population. 5 Similarly, a study in Berkshire, England, showed that the 5-year survival of patients undergoing surveillance with AAAs Ͻ4 cm and 4 to 5.5 cm in diameter was 62% and 45%, respectively, compared with 80% in an age-and sex-matched population. 7 Again, the majority of late deaths were from cardiovascular causes. 7 Only an earlier American study, with a policy of selective coronary artery revascularization, and a recent Australian study have shown 5-year survival for AAA patients to be equivalent to age-and sex-matched populations. 8,9 In the Australian study, however, women with AAAs still experienced worse 5-year survival rates than did the age-matched controls. 9 These studies suggest that the presence of small AAAs may be a marker for risk of death from cardiovascular di...

1. Atherosclerosis and aneurysm of the abdominal aorta are associated with thinning of the medial connective tissue. We have investigated the presence of the connective-tissue-degrading metalloproteinases in homogenates prepared from atherosclerotic, aneurysmal and control aortic media. 2. Gelatinase activity was much increased in homogenates from atherosclerotic and aneurysmal aorta [10.9 +/- 1.8 and 13.3 +/- 3.3 micrograms of gelatin hydrolysed h-1 (mg of protein)-1 respectively]. This gelatinase activity was highest at the luminal aspect of the aortic media, where the activity increased three- to five-fold after the destruction of alpha 2-macroglobulin. Zymograms demonstrated the principal gelatinase in atherosclerotic aorta to have a molecular mass of about 92 kDa, whereas in aneurysmal aorta there was a spectrum of gelatinase activity from 92 to 55 kDa. 3. Collagenase and stromelysin (proteoglycanase) could be detected by immunoblotting in homogenates of aneurysmal aorta, but rarely in atherosclerotic aorta and never in control aorta. Collagenase and stromelysin activities were low, but increased two- to three-fold after the destruction of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases. Collagenase and stromelysin activities were highest at the adventitial aspect of aneurysmal media. 4. The secretion of gelatinase by inflammatory cells at the intima of diseased aorta could have a pathological role in establishing atherosclerotic plaques and medial thinning. Secretion of collagenase, gelatinase and stromelysin from the adventitia could accelerate connective tissue degradation in the media of aneurysmal aorta.

The repeatability, observer bias and instrument bias of aortic diameter measurement by ultrasonography, were investigated in ten patients with small (3-6 cm by computed tomography) infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. The repeatability of maximum aortic diameter measurement by ultrasonography was much better for anterior-posterior than transverse diameter, with coefficients of repeatability 3.0-7.5 mm and 10-15 mm respectively. The repeatability of suprarenal aortic diameter measurement was poor. Surprisingly, maximum diameter using ultrasonography was larger than that using computed tomography, the difference being least for anterior-posterior measurements. At best a single, experienced observer, using the same instrument may provide aortic diameters using ultrasonography accurate to within 5 mm, but more commonly such aortic diameter is only accurate to within 8 mm.