No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

H alf a decade into a new global economic crisis, most policymakers, pundits, and scholars discuss the situation in nongendered ways, carting out long-standing criticisms of bloated states or of neoliberalism, despite powerful feminist critiques. At the same time, feminist scholars, particularly those within feminist political science (FPS) studying advanced democracies, have been struggling with a "central paradox. .. . The widespread formal adoption and development of. .. gender equality. .. initiatives. .. [but] their partial and variable institutionalization in terms of impact on institutional practices, norms, and outcomes" Janet Elise Johnson is grateful for travel funds from PSC-CUNY and The Nation (see Johnson 2011) and for Hrö nn Sveinsdó ttir and others who introduced me to Iceland. An earlier version of this article was presented at the European Consortium for Political Research in August of 2011 in a panel on "male dominance" chaired by Drude Dahlerup. A special thanks to our reviewers who went beyond the call of duty.

Anticipation is a genetic phenomenon wherein age of disease onset decreases and/ or severity increases in successive generations. Anticipation has been demonstrated for several neuropsychiatric disorders with expanding trinucleotide repeats recently identified as the underlying molecular mechanism. We report here the results of an analysis of anticipation performed with multiplex families segregating schizophre-nia. Thirty-three families were identified through the NIMH Genetics Initiative that met the following criteria: had at least two affected members in successive generations and were not bilineal. Affectation diagnoses included schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder depressed , and psychosis NOS. Additional analyses included the Cluster A personality disorders. Three indices of age of onset were used. Disease severity was measured by several different indices. Four sampling schemes as suggested by McInnis et al. were tested, as well as additional analysis using pairs ascertained through the parental generation. Anticipation was demonstrated for age of onset, regardless of the index or sampling scheme used (P<0.05). Anticipation was not supported for disease severity. Analyses that took into account drug use and diminished fecundity did not affect the results. While the data strongly support intergenerational differences in disease onset consistent with anticipation, they must be viewed cautiously given unavoidable biases attending these analyses.

No abstract

Why hasn’t the marked increase in women in politics over the last half century led to the expected results of increased gender equality and more democracy? In order to propose a new answer to this question, which is central for both theoretical and empirical feminist political science, I look at the case of Putin’s Russia as one of the authoritarian-leaning regimes that have promoted women into politics while simultaneously becoming more misogynist. Building on feminist institutionalism and the study of Russia’s regime dynamics, both of which are extending the study of informal institutions, I claim that women are being fast-tracked into politics informally, not just formally such as by party or legislative quotas. Yet these women are then boxed in by informal rules and by parallel institutions and posts, with virtually no opportunities to advocate for women’s interests. Putin’s regime has promoted women to be “stand ins” during times of crisis or change, “loyalists” and “showgirls” when the regime needs to showcase elections and representation, and “cleaners” when the appearance of corruption threatens the regime. Even demonstrations of ultimate loyalty have not protected those women who once advocated for feminist policies. This exercise in concept building suggests a framework for thinking about the importance and operation of informal institutions, sustained by gendered and homophobic rules, as a bulwark of male dominance that undermines women’s representation. There are also important policy implications, as advocates have been pushing for more women in politics to address a variety of ills that, my analysis suggests, will not be solved by numbers alone.

To help clarify the genetics of schizophrenia, the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program has completed data collection for a genetic linkage study of schizophrenia. This article describes the methodological details of the data collection. Subsequent articles will describe the results of our genome scan, which is now in progress. The data collection protocol included the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies, the Family Interview for Genetic Studies, a review of medical records, and the collection of blood for transformation into lymphoblast cell lines. Among relatives of schizophrenic probands, we assessed auditory attention and verbal memory with neuropsychological tests. Among the 166 families ascertained for the study, 143 had a single affected sib-pair, 17 had three affected siblings, one had five affected siblings and five had two sets of affected siblings. There was a total of 216 affected sib-pairs in these families. Using the n-1 rule, these families contain 188 independent affected sib-pairs.