A trio of genes might potentially distinguish doxorubicin-responsive from nonresponsive tumors, but further validation by a larger number of samples is still needed.
An association between codon-72 p53 polymorphism and risk of human papillomavirus (HPV)-induced cervical cancer has been found recently, but it has been difficult to replicate. In this study, we assess the impact of inter-laboratory variation in p53 genotyping on the validity of the proposed association. DNA specimens were randomly selected from 54 invasive, squamous cell carcinoma cases, 52 HPV-negative, and 39 HPV-positive controls from a previous case-control study in Brazil. Codon-72 polymorphism was blindly analyzed in three different laboratories. We calculated age- and race-adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) using logistic regression for gauging the association between p53 polymorphism and cervical cancer risk. The proportions of the Arg/Arg, Arg/Pro, and Pro/Pro genotypes varied substantially among laboratories with Kappa coefficients in the 0.49-0.63 range. When disagreement between labs was allowed, the OR for the Arg/Arg genotype, compared to other forms, was as low as 1.5 (95% CI: 0.5-3. 9). In contrast, the OR increased to 8.0 (95% CI: 2.3-28.5) after exclusion of discordant genotypes. Restricting the comparison to HPV-positive controls increased the magnitude of the relation appreciably. After exclusion of all discordant diagnoses, the OR was 21.5 (95% CI: 3.4-137.8), whereas with disagreed genotypes the association was not significant (OR = 2.9, 95% CI: 0.7-11.9). Homozygous codon-72 p53-Arg apparently confers a higher susceptibility to HPV-associated cervical tumorigenesis. However, exposure misclassification consequent to inter-laboratory variation in protocols may affect the ability to detect the association.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.