No abstract

Under the auspices of the Organic Analysis Working Group (OAWG) of the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM) a key comparison, CCQM K55.b, was coordinated by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) in 2010/2011. Nineteen national measurement institutes and the BIPM participated. Participants were required to assign the mass fraction of aldrin present as the main component in the comparison sample for CCQM-K55.b which consisted of technical grade aldrin obtained from the National Measurement Institute Australia that had been subject to serial recrystallization and drying prior to sub-division into the units supplied for the comparison.Aldrin was selected to be representative of the performance of a laboratory's measurement capability for the purity assignment of organic compounds of medium structural complexity [molar mass range 300 Da to 500 Da] and low polarity (pKOW < −2) for which related structure impurities can be quantified by capillary gas phase chromatography (GC).The key comparison reference value (KCRV) for the aldrin content of the material was 950.8 mg/g with a combined standard uncertainty of 0.85 mg/g. The KCRV was assigned by combination of KCRVs assigned by consensus from participant results for each orthogonal impurity class. The relative expanded uncertainties reported by laboratories having results consistent with the KCRV ranged from 0.3% to 0.6% using a mass balance approach and 0.5% to 1% using a qNMR method.The major analytical challenge posed by the material proved to be the detection and quantification of a significant amount of oligomeric organic material within the sample and most participants relying on a mass balance approach displayed a positive bias relative to the KCRV (overestimation of aldrin content) in excess of 10 mg/g due to not having adequate procedures in place to detect and quantify the non-volatile content—specifically the non-volatile organics content—of the comparison sample.There was in general excellent agreement between participants in the identification and the quantification of the total and individual related structure impurities, water content and the residual solvent content of the sample.The comparison demonstrated the utility of 1H NMR as an independent method for quantitative analysis of high purity compounds. In discussion of the participant results it was noted that while several had access to qNMR estimates for the aldrin content that were inconsistent with their mass balance determination they decided to accept the mass balance result and assumed a hidden bias in their NMR data. By contrast, laboratories that placed greater confidence in their qNMR result were able to resolve the discrepancy through additional studies that provided evidence of the presence of non-volatile organic impurity at the requisite level to bring their mass balance and qNMR estimates into agreement.Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison ...

No abstract

/npsi/ctrl?lang=en http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/ctrl?lang=fr READ THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CAREFULLY BEFORE USING THIS WEBSITE.http://nparc.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/npsi/jsp/nparc_cp.jsp?lang=en Vous avez des questions? Nous pouvons vous aider. Pour communiquer directement avec un auteur, consultez la première page de la revue dans laquelle son article a été publié afin de trouver ses coordonnées. Si vous n'arrivez pas à les repérer, communiquez avec nous à PublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. Questions? Contact the NRC Publications Archive team atPublicationsArchive-ArchivesPublications@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca. If you wish to email the authors directly, please see the first page of the publication for their contact information. NRC Publications Archive Archives des publications du CNRCFor the publisher's version, please access the DOI link below./ Pour consulter la version de l'éditeur, utilisez le lien DOI ci-dessous.http://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/51/1A/08008 Metrologia, 51, 1A, 2014-01-01 CCQM-K72 Purity of Zinc with respect to six defined metallic analytes MotivationHigh purity elements can serve as a realisation of the SI unit amount of substance for the specific element. Solutions prepared from high purity metals by applying gravimetric preparation and the concept of molar mass are used as 'calibration' solutions in many fields of analytical chemistry and provide the metrological basis in elemental analysis. Since ideal purity does not exist for real materials, the actual purity of the high purity material must be known with a specified uncertainty. Such purity data, however, are only accessible via measurements, which are limited by their measurement uncertainty. Aiming at uncertainties around 10 -4relative on the purity statement in almost all cases a direct measurement of the element in itself is not applicable, because the available methods are not sufficiently selective and/or accurate. Therefore the indirect approach is followed in order to achieve uncertainties at this level. In the indirect approach the mass fractions of all impurities, in other words all elements excepting the matrix element, are measured and their sum is subtracted from the value for ideal purity, which is 1 kg/kg. Uncertainties at the 10 -4 level are aimed at because high purity metals are not only destined for being used as convenient primary realisations of the SI unit, but also as primary assays or so-called back-spikes in double isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS). With double IDMS combined uncertainties down to 5·10 -4 can be achieved and therefore the uncertainty on the purity statement for these materials should be at or even lower than 10 -4 relative in order not to compromise the IDMS results.As a first step, only six metallic impurities are considered in previous studies and also in this comparison, in order to limit the effort within this study. Other metallic and non-metallic impurities might be subject to future CCQM studies. Zinc was chosen as matrix, due to its ease of...

No abstract

Main text The CCQM-K154.b comparison was coordinated by the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM) and the Chinese National Institute of Metrology (NIM) on behalf of the Organic Analysis Working Group (OAWG) of the Comité Consultatif pour la Quantité de Matière (CCQM) for National Measurement Institutes (NMIs) and Designated Institutes (DIs) which provide measurement services in organic analysis under the 'Comité International des Poids et Mesures' Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA) and/or have participated in the BIPM's Mycotoxin Metrology Capacity Building and Knowledge Transfer (MMCBKT) project as part of its "Metrology for Safe Food and Feed in Developing Economies" Capacity Building Programme. Gravimetrically-prepared solutions having an assigned mass fraction of specified organic analytes are routinely used to calibrate measurement processes for the quantification of the same analytes in matrix samples. Appropriate assignments of the property value and associated uncertainty of calibration solutions thus underpin the traceability of routine analysis and are critical for accurate measurements. Evidence of successful participation in relevant international comparisons is needed to document calibration and measurement capability claims (CMCs) made by national metrology institutes and designated institutes. In total, eleven NMIs/DIs participated in the Track C, Model II, Key Comparison CCQM-K154.b [Gravimetric preparation and value assignment of aflatoxin B1 (AfB1) in acetonitrile (ACN)] for emerging areas of global interest and innovation. Participants were requested to gravimetrically prepare calibration solutions and value assign the mass fractions, expressed in mg/kg, of aflatoxin B1 (AfB1) in the acetonitrile (ACN) solution. Study samples, with assigned values and associated uncertainties were prepared by the comparison participants and sent to the coordinating laboratory for comparison. The Key Comparison Reference Values (KCRVs), calculated form values measured by the coordinating laboratory based on calibrations obtained from independent gravimetrically prepared calibrant solutions, agreed with participants reported values, within their stated uncertainties. AfB1 was selected to be representative of polar aflatoxins. Aflatoxins are a class of mycotoxins generally produced by fungi of the genus Aspergillus. It was anticipated to provide a challenge representative for the gravimetrical preparation and value assignment of calibration solutions in the mass fraction range of 2 mg/kg to 50 mg/kg of mycotoxins with broadly similar structural characteristics. Nine participants of the MMCBKT programme were provided with a stock solution having a known AfB1 mass fraction and expanded uncertainty to use to gravimetrically prepare and value assign a calibration solution. Three NMIs/DIs also participated using their own calibration solutions. The use of in-house solutions required an additional capacity to undertake a fit-for-purpose purity assessment. NIM was the only NMI participating using both the MMCBKT based and their own in-house assigned solutions in order to connect the two different groups. It was decided to propose separate KCRVs for each of the two ampoules provided by the participating NMIs/DIs based on the AfB1 mass fraction. This allowed participants to demonstrate the efficacy of their implementation of the approaches used to gravimetrically prepare calibration solutions and to assess the AfB1 mass fraction. The majority of the AfB1 mass fraction KCRVs (wKCRV) for CCQM-K154.b spanned a mass fraction range of 2.02 mg/kg to 31.57 mg/kg. The relative expanded uncertainties U(wKCRV) ranged from 0.69 % to 2.93 %. Inspection of the degree of equivalence plots for the AfB1 mass fraction assignments in CCQM-K154.b indicated that there was an excellent agreement of results. Solely, the AfB1 mass fraction assignments of INRAP did not agree with the KCRVs. It was found that the samples were altered as a result of an acid contamination. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/. The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).

No abstract

Testes agudos e testes de fuga foram realizados com populações laboratoriais do isópodo Cubaris murina para avaliar sua sensibilidade ao glifosato. As soluções contaminantes foram preparadas a partir do herbicida Roundup®. Nos tes-tes agudos, dez filhotes foram confinados e expostos em cada tratamento: solo com três concentrações diferentes de glifosato e solo controle (sem contaminante). A mortalidade foi observada após 7 dias. Utilizou-se o teste de Spearman-Karber para calcular a LC 50. Nos testes de fuga, dez juvenis foram soltos no centro de cada recipiente-teste, com quatro porções de solo: três porções com diferentes concentrações de glifosato e um controle. A preferência dos isópodos foi registrada após 1,5, 2, 3, 4 e 24 horas. Utilizou-se ANOVA para verificar se houve diferenças significativas entre o número médio de isópodos em cada tratamento e o controle. A 7-d-LC 50 foi de 35,5 mg gli/g solo. Nos testes de fuga, diferenças significativas (p < 0,05) em relação ao controle, indicando a fuga, ocorreram em todos os tratamentos, inclusive em 5,12 mg gli/g solo, já após 1,5 hora. O comportamento de fuga foi um alvo fisiológico muito sensível, avaliável em experimentos de baixo custo, apresentando uma resposta rápida e de grande relevância ecológica.