No abstract

No abstract

-This paper presents a novel experimental method which uses a Virtual Reality (VR) headset, aiming to provide an alternative environment for the conduction of subjective assessments of daylit spaces. This method can overcome the difficulty of controlling the variation of luminous conditions, one of the main challenges in experimental studies using daylight, while its novelty lies in the implementation of physically-based renderings into an immersive virtual environment. The present work investigates the adequacy of the proposed method to evaluate five aspects of subjective perception of daylit spaces: the perceived pleasantness, interest, excitement, complexity and satisfaction with the amount of view in the space. To this end, experiments with 29 participants were conducted, to comparing the user's perception of a real daylit environment and its equivalent representation in VR and testing the effect of the display method on the participants' perceptual evaluations, reported physical symptoms, and their perceived presence in the virtual space. The results indicate a high level of perceptual accuracy, showing no significant differences between the real and virtual environments on the studied evaluations. In addition, there was a high level of perceived presence in the virtual environment and no significant effects on the participants' physical symptoms after the use of the VR headset. Following these findings, the presented experimental method in VR seems very promising for use as a surrogate to real environments in investigating the aforementioned five dimensions of perception in daylit spaces.

No abstract

This study evaluates the performance and robustness of 22 established and newly proposed glare prediction metrics. Experimental datasets of daylight-dominated workplaces in office-like test rooms were collected from studies by seven research groups in six different locations (Argentina, Denmark, Germany, Israel, Japan and the United States). The variability in experimental setups, locations and research teams allowed reliable evaluation of the performance and robustness of glare metrics for daylight-dominated workplaces. Independent statistical methods were applied to individual datasets and also to one combined dataset to evaluate the performance and robustness of the 22 glare metrics. As performance and robustness are not established in literature, we defined performance as: (1) the ability of the metric value to describe the glare scale (evaluated by Spearman rank correlation), and (2) the ability of the metric to distinguish between disturbing and non-disturbing situations (evaluated by diagnostic receiver operating characteristic curve analysis tests). Furthermore, we defined robustness as the ability of a metric to deliver meaningful results when applied to different datasets and to fail as few as possible statistical tests. Average Spearman rank correlation coefficients in the range of 0.55–0.60 as well as average prediction rates to distinguish between disturbing and non-disturbing glare of 70–75% for several of the metrics indicate their reliability. The results also show that metrics considering the saturation effect as a main input in their equation perform better and are more robust in daylight-dominated workplaces than purely contrast-based metrics or purely empirical metrics. In this study, the daylight glare probability (DGP) delivered the highest performance amongst the tested metrics and was also found to be the most robust. Future research should aim to optimise the terms of glare equations which combine contrast and saturation effects, such as DGP, PGSV or UGRexp, to achieve metrics that also perform reliably in dimmer lighting conditions than the ones explored in this study.

No abstract

No abstract

In the field of lighting, luminance maps are often used to evaluate point-in-time lighting scenes from the occupant's vantage point. High Dynamic Range (HDR) photography can be used to generate such luminance maps. The aim of this tutorial is to present a comprehensive overview of a step-by-step procedure to generate a 180°luminance map of a daylit scene from a sequence of multiple exposures with semiprofessional equipment and the Radiance suite of programs. The procedure consists in capturing a sequence of multiple exposures of the visual scene; selecting the useful exposures; merging the exposures to generate the HDR image by using the predefined camera response function; nullifying the exposure value; resizing and cropping the HDR image by using the predefined fisheye view coordinates; adjusting the projection of the HDR image by using the predefined distortion function; correcting the vignetting of the HDR image by using the predefined vignetting curves; correcting the alterations of the HDR image due to the Neutral Density (ND) filter if one was used, by using the predefined ND correction function; adjusting the photometry of the HDR image by using the measured spot luminance value; editing the HDR image header by using the predefined projection type and real viewing angle; and checking the validity of the HDR image by using the measured vertical illuminance, and, if needed, the predefined luminous range. To conclude, an analysis of errors is made and attention points to adapt the procedure for electric or circadian lighting studies are discussed.