The effects of thermal radiation in a heated jet of water vapor are studied with a direct numerical simulation coupled to a Monte-Carlo solver. The adequacy of the numerical setup is first demonstrated in the uncoupled isothermal and heated turbulent plane jets with comparisons to experimental and numerical data. Radiative energy transfer is then accounted for with spectral dependency of the radiative properties described by the Correlated-k (ck) method. Between the direct impact through modification of the temperature field by the additional radiative transfer and the indirect one where the varied flow density changes the turbulent mixing, the present study is able to clearly identify the second one in the jet developed region by considering conditions where effects of thermal radiation are moderate. When using standard jet scaling laws, the different studied cases without radiation and with small-to-moderate radiative heat transfer yield different profiles even when thermal radiation becomes locally negligible. By deriving another scaling law for the decay of the temperature profile, self-similarity is obtained for the different turbulent jets. The results of the study allow for distinguishing whether thermal radiation modifies the nature of heat transfer mechanisms in the jet developed region or not while removing the indirect effects of modified density.
Simplified chemistry models are commonly used in reactive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to alleviate the computational cost. Uncertainties associated with the calibration of such simplified models have been characterized in some works, but to our knowledge, there is a lack of studies analyzing the subsequent propagation through CFD simulation of combustion processes.This work propagates the uncertainties -arising in the calibration of a global chemistry model -through direct numerical simulations (DNS) of flame-vortex interactions. Calibration uncertainties are derived by inferring the parameters of a two-step reaction mechanism for methane, using synthetic observations of one-dimensional laminar premixed flames based on a detailed mechanism. To assist the inference, independent surrogate models for estimating flame speed and thermal thickness are built taking advantage of the Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and the Polynomial Chaos (PC) expansion. Using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling method, a discussion on how push-forward posterior densities behave with respect to the detailed mechanism is provided based on three different calibrations relying (i) only on flame speed, (ii) only on thermal thickness, and (iii) on both quantities simultaneously.The model parameter uncertainties characterized in the latter calibration are propagated to two-dimensional flamevortex interactions using 60 independent samples. Posterior predictive densities for the time evolution of the heat release and flame surface are consistent, being that the confidence intervals contain the reference simulation. However, the twostep mechanism fails to reproduce the flame response to stretch as it was not considered in the calibration. This study highlights the capabilities and limitations of propagating chemistry-models uncertainties to CFD applications to fully quantify posterior uncertainties on target quantities.
Abstract. Air quality (AQ) forecasting systems are usually built upon physics-based numerical models that are affected by a number of uncertainty sources. In order to reduce forecast errors, first and foremost the bias, they are often coupled with model output statistics (MOS) modules. MOS methods are statistical techniques used to correct raw forecasts at surface monitoring station locations, where AQ observations are available. In this study, we investigate the extent to which AQ forecasts can be improved using a variety of MOS methods, including moving average, quantile mapping, Kalman filter, analogs and gradient boosting machine methods, and consider as well the persistence method as a reference. We apply our analysis to the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) regional ensemble median O3 forecasts over the Iberian Peninsula during 2018–2019. A key aspect of our study is the evaluation, which is performed using a comprehensive set of continuous and categorical metrics at various timescales, along different lead times and using different meteorological input datasets. Our results show that O3 forecasts can be substantially improved using such MOS corrections and that improvements go well beyond the correction of the systematic bias. Depending on the timescale and lead time, root mean square errors decreased from 20 %–40 % to 10 %–30 %, while Pearson correlation coefficients increased from 0.7–0.8 to 0.8–0.9. Although the improvement typically affects all lead times, some MOS methods appear more adversely impacted by the lead time. The MOS methods relying on meteorological data were found to provide relatively similar performance with two different meteorological inputs. Importantly, our results also clearly show the trade-offs between continuous and categorical skills and their dependencies on the MOS method. The most sophisticated MOS methods better reproduce O3 mixing ratios overall, with the lowest errors and highest correlations. However, they are not necessarily the best in predicting the peak O3 episodes, for which simpler MOS methods can achieve better results. Although the complex impact of MOS methods on the distribution of and variability in raw forecasts can only be comprehended through an extended set of complementary statistical metrics, our study shows that optimally implementing MOS in AQ forecast systems crucially requires selecting the appropriate skill score to be optimized for the forecast application of interest.
Abstract. Air quality (AQ) forecasting systems are usually built upon physics-based numerical models that are affected by a number of uncertainty sources. In order to reduce forecast errors, first and foremost the bias, they are often coupled with Model Output Statistics (MOS) modules. MOS methods are statistical techniques used to correct raw forecasts at surface monitoring station locations, where AQ observations are available. In this study, we investigate to what extent AQ forecasts can be improved using a variety of MOS methods, including persistence (PERS), moving average (MA), quantile mapping (QM), Kalman Filter (KF), analogs (AN), and gradient boosting machine (GBM). We apply our analysis to the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) regional ensemble median O3 forecasts over the Iberian Peninsula during 2018–2019. A key aspect of our study is the evaluation, which is performed using a very comprehensive set of continuous and categorical metrics at various time scales (hourly to daily), along different lead times (1 to 4 days), and using different meteorological input data (forecast vs reanalyzed). Our results show that O3 forecasts can be substantially improved using such MOS corrections and that this improvement goes much beyond the correction of the systematic bias. Although it typically affects all lead times, some MOS methods appear more adversely impacted by the lead time. When considering MOS methods relying on meteorological information and comparing the results obtained with IFS forecasts and ERA5 reanalysis, the relative deterioration brought by the use of IFS is minor, which paves the way for their use in operational MOS applications. Importantly, our results also clearly show the trade-offs between continuous and categorical skills and their dependencies on the MOS method. The most sophisticated MOS methods better reproduce O3 mixing ratios overall, with lowest errors and highest correlations. However, they are not necessarily the best in predicting the highest O3 episodes, for which simpler MOS methods can give better results. Although the complex impact of MOS methods on the distribution and variability of raw forecasts can only be comprehended through an extended set of complementary statistical metrics, our study shows that optimally implementing MOS in AQ forecast systems crucially requires selecting the appropriate skill score to be optimized for the forecast application of interest.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.