The results of this meta-analysis indicate that patients who undergo bariatric surgery experience improvement and resolution of their hypertension.

No abstract

Objective Chronic neuropathic pain is a common symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS). This randomized controlled single-blinded study investigated whether a new protocol involving five days of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) with an interval period would be effective to reduce pain using the visual analog scale (VAS). Other secondary outcomes included the Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS), Depression Anxiety Stress Score (DASS), Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SFMPQ), and Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life 54 (MSQOL54). Design A total of 30 participants were recruited for the study, with 15 participants randomized to a sham group or and 15 randomized to an active group. After a five-day course of a-tDCS, VAS and NPS scores were measured daily and then weekly after treatment up to four weeks after treatment. Secondary outcomes were measured pretreatment and then weekly up to four weeks. Results After a five-day course of a-tDCS, VAS scores were significantly reduced compared with sham tDCS and remained significantly low up to week 2 post-treatment. There were no statistically significant mean changes in MSQOL54, SFMPQ, NPS, or DASS for the sham or treatment group before treatment or at four-week follow-up. Conclusions This study shows that repeated stimulation with a-tDCS for five days can reduce pain intensity for a prolonged period in patients with MS who have chronic neuropathic pain.

AbstractBackground and purposePain is a common symptom associated with multiple sclerosis (MS), and has lasting effects on an individual’s functional capacity and quality of life. A wide range of prevalence rates of pain (between 23% and 90%)have been reported in MS and this is mainly due to the methodological differences amongst the studies such as variability in patient sources, method of sampling and the definition of pain used. Chronic pain in MS, defined as pain lasting for greater than 3–6 months, can have a significant impact on their biopsychosocial health, including negative impact on activities of daily living, relationships and social participation. The long-term course of MS-related pain and its impact in an Australian cohort over a 7-year period has been investigated earlier. The aim of this longitudinal study was to describe the impact of chronic pain, pain-related disability and carer burden in persons with MS over a 10-year period. The aim of this longitudinal study was to describe the impact of chronic pain, pain-related disability and carer burden in persons with MS over a 10-year period.MethodsThis was a prospective longitudinal study conducted at the Rehabilitation Department of Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH), a tertiary referral hospital in Victoria and Australia. The source of participants was from the RMH MS database and contains detailed MS patient information including demographic data, diagnosis details (using McDonald’s criteria), pain characteristics. Structured face-face interviews and validated measures were used, which include the visual analogue scale (VAS); chronic pain grade (CPG); the assessment of quality of life (AQoL) and the carer strain index (CSI). The mean age of the participants (n = 70) was 55.3 years and majority (70%) were female.ResultsThe mean age of the participants (n = 70) was 55.3 years and majority (70%) were female. The findings show that over time (10 years), participants report having greater bilateral bodily pain and greater description of pain as ‘worse as it could be’. Pain types were similar to 7-years follow-up but remained higher than baseline. There was a significant deterioration in quality of life in those with more severe CPG over time. Almost half of the participants 31 (44%) required care either from a private carer, institution or from a family member. Although fear of taking medications and side effects were common barriers to treatment for pain, there was an increase in the use of pharmacological treatment over time and an increase in the use of healthcare services, mainly neurologists and general practitioners.ConclusionsThe pain measures reported by the participants were similar to those at the 7-year follow-up except there was a greater representation of bilateral pain locations (limb, trunk and facial pain) compared to baseline and 7-year follow-up. At 10-year follow-up, more participants used medications compared tc 7-year follow-up and there was an increase in the use of health professionals at the 10-year follow-up At the 10-year follow up QoL of the participants deteriorated significantly and more participants had progressed to higher CPGIII and CPGIV. This study demonstrates that chronic pain is a significant issue over time in MS, with clinical and health implications, impact on quality of life, disability and healthcare utilization.ImplicationsGreater awareness of chronic pain in pwMS, cognitive classifications and an interdisciplinary approach is required to improve long-term patient outcomes and well-being.Crown Copyright © 2017 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Scandinavian Association for the Study of Pain. All rights reserved.

Summary. Facilities providing a co-ordinated 'system' of care to the spinal cord injured are now more accepted as being preferable to fragmented 'non-system' facilities. Data reflecting the incidence of selected complications common to spinal cord injury were collected over a 2-year period from a system located outside the United States and from 'non-systems' within the United States. The latter was defined as care provided in community facilities prior to entry into one of 14 model United States spinal cord injury centres.All complications occurred more frequently in the American group, particularly decubitus ulcers and urinary tract infections.The data suggest that system care is preferable to non-system care in its capacity to prevent costly complications and the sooner the spinal cord injured patient is referred to a spinal cord centre capable of meeting all his needs, the less likely will he be exposed to complications that could slow the rehabilitation effort.

We wished to determine the extent to which drugs used to treat HIV disease and its clinical manifestations are prescribed for conditions other than those listed on the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approved drug label, how such "off-label" use varies by patient characteristics and type of HIV-related medical condition, and the extent to which physicians alter the way they treat HIV-related conditions because of reimbursement problems associated with off-label drug use. We surveyed 1,530 primary care providers for people with HIV disease between February and May 1993. A three-part survey instrument was used to obtain data on the drugs prescribed for the last three patients with HIV disease treated by the provider, the preferred choice of therapy for 32 specific HIV-related conditions, and the extent to which providers faced reimbursement problems regarding the use of drugs for off-label indications. Three drug compendia were used as cited sources of off-label drug uses. In all, 387 (32%) evaluable surveys were returned, yielding data on 1,148 patients. The majority (81%) of patients received at least one drug off-label, and almost half (40%) of all reported drug therapy was off-label. Most off-label drug use was for treatment and prevention of HIV-related opportunistic infections, which frequently represented the community standard of practice (e.g., trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for prevention of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia), or the de facto standard of practice when no licensed therapies were available (e.g., drugs for treatment of Mycobacterium avium complex, MAC). More than 75% of off-label usage was cited in at least one of the three authoritative medical compendia. The use of drugs for off-label indications in HIV care is common and frequently represents community standards of care. Reliance on drug compendia for support of off-label drug use accounts for the majority of such uses, although many legitimate off-label uses may not be included because of compendia publication lag. The prevalence of off-label drug use in routine clinical practice and the development of newer and more costly drugs for treatment of HIV and its medical complications argues for the articulation of an explicit national reimbursement policy for off-label uses of prescription drugs so that medically appropriate therapies will be available to those with insurance in a rational, consistent way.

Non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis.

No abstract