2018
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd012622.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Non-pharmacological interventions for chronic pain in multiple sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
1
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding neuromodulation in MS-related NP, the following techniques seem to have promising effects: intrathecal baclofen, functional electrical stimulation, DBS, and spinal cord stimulation [72]. Regarding nonpharmacological interventions, including TENS, psychotherapy (e.g., telephone self-management or hypnosis), transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), hydrotherapy, and reflexology, there is at present a very low level of evidence to support their use in patients with chronic MS-related NP, based on a recent Cochrane meta-analysis [73].…”
Section: Chronic Central Npmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding neuromodulation in MS-related NP, the following techniques seem to have promising effects: intrathecal baclofen, functional electrical stimulation, DBS, and spinal cord stimulation [72]. Regarding nonpharmacological interventions, including TENS, psychotherapy (e.g., telephone self-management or hypnosis), transcranial random noise stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), hydrotherapy, and reflexology, there is at present a very low level of evidence to support their use in patients with chronic MS-related NP, based on a recent Cochrane meta-analysis [73].…”
Section: Chronic Central Npmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be also used to address a large number of clinical conditions at both acute and chronic stages of disease expression, ranging from treatment of phobias and affective disorders (e.g., depression or posttraumatic stress disorder) to neuropsychiatric disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, psychosis, anorexia nervosa, and somatic symptom disorder (Lynn et al, 2010). As an alternative approach for multiple medical conditions, hypnosis has also a well-established evidence of treating and managing a spectrum of painful conditions (Vanhaudenhuyse et al, 2015(Vanhaudenhuyse et al, , 2018, such as dilation and curettage (Fathi et al, 2017), irritable bowel syndrome (Gonsalkorale et al, 2003;Surdea-Blaga et al, 2016), phantom limb (Oakley and Halligan, 2002), migraine (Flynn, 2018), cancer-related pain (Vickers and Cassileth, 2001;Carlson et al, 2018), and pain related to multiple sclerosis (Amatya et al, 2018). A common denominator for these interventions is the involvement of the cingulate cortex (Vogt and Brent, 2009).…”
Section: The Merits Of Hypnosis In Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This limitation is frequently reported in other systematic reviews regarding vestibular rehabilitation interventions [34,35]. Third, different types of multiple sclerosis were included; however, as in the present review, it is frequent for non-pharmacological interventions to establish inclusion criteria based on disability related to multiple sclerosis instead of the subtype of the disease [38,39]. Fourth, only two studies analysed the presence of brainstem/cerebellar involvement based on magnetic resonance imaging scans and neurologic examinations [27,28], and only one of them contrasted the results taking this condition into account [28].…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 85%