[1] Gross primary production (GPP) is one of the most important characteristics of an ecosystem. At present, no empirically based method to estimate GPP is available, other than measurements of net CO 2 exchange and calculations of respiration. Data sets from continuous CO 2 flux measurements in a number of ecosystems (Ameriflux, AgriFlux, etc.) for the first time provide an opportunity to obtain empirically based estimates of GPP. In this paper, using the results of CO 2 flux tower measurements during the 1997 season at four sites in Oklahoma (tallgrass prairie, mixed prairie, pasture, and winter wheat crop), we describe a method to evaluate the average daytime rate of ecosystem respiration, R d , by estimation of the respiration term of the nonrectangular hyperbolic model of the ecosystem-scale light-response curve. Comparison of these predicted daytime respiration rates with directly measured corresponding nighttime values, R n , after appropriate length of the night and temperature correction, demonstrated close linear relationship, with 0.82 R 2 0.98 for weekly averaged fluxes. Daily gross primary productivity, P g , can be calculated as P g = P d + R d , where P d is the daytime integral of the net ecosystem CO 2 exchange, obtained directly from measurements. Annual GPP for the sites, obtained as the sum of P g over the whole period with P g > 0 were: tallgrass prairie, 5223 g CO 2 m À2 ; winter wheat, 2853 g CO 2 m À2 ; mixed prairie, 3037 g CO 2 m À2 ; and pasture, 2333 g CO 2 m À2. These values are in agreement with published GPP estimates for nonforest terrestrial ecosystems.

Grasslands and agroecosystems occupy one-third of the terrestrial area, but their contribution to the global carbon cycle remains uncertain. We used a set of 316 site-years of CO₂ exchange measurements to quantify gross primary productivity, respiration, and light-response parameters of grasslands, shrublands/savanna, wetlands, and cropland ecosystems worldwide. We analyzed data from 72 global flux-tower sites partitioned into gross photosynthesis and ecosystem respiration with the use of the light-response method (Gilmanov, T. G., D. A. Johnson, and N. Z. Saliendra. 2003. Growing season CO₂ fluxes in a sagebrushsteppe ecosystem in Idaho: Bowen ratio/energy balance measurements and modeling. Basic and Applied Ecology 4:167-183) from the RANGEFLUX and WORLDGRASSAGRIFLUX data sets supplemented by 46 sites from the FLUXNET La Thuile data set partitioned with the use of the temperature-response method (Reichstein, M., E. Falge, D. Baldocchi, D. Papale, R. Valentini, M. Aubinet, P. Berbigier, C. Bernhofer, N. Buchmann, M. Falk, T. Gilmanov, A. Granier, T. Grunwald, K. Havrankova, D. Janous, A. Knohl, T. Laurela, A. Lohila, D. Loustau, G. Matteucci, T. Meyers, F. Miglietta, J.M. Ourcival, D. Perrin, J. Pumpanen, S. Rambal, E. Rotenberg, M. Sanz, J. Tenhunen, G. Seufert, F. Vaccari, T. Vesala, and D. Yakir. 2005. On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm. Global Change Biology 11: 1.424-1439). Maximum values of the quantum yield (alpha = 75 mmol.mol(-1)), photosynthetic capacity (A(max) = 3.4 mg CO₂ . m(-2).s-1), gross photosynthesis (P-g,P-max = 1.16 g CO₂ . m(-2).d(-1)), and ecological light-use efficiency (epsilon(ecol) = 59 mmol . mol(-1)) of managed grasslands and high-production croplands exceeded those of most forest ecosystems, indicating the potential of nonforest ecosystems for uptake of atmospheric CO₂. Maximum values of gross primary production (8 600 g CO₂ . m(-2).yr(-1)), total ecosystem respiration (7 900 g CO₂ . m(-2).yr(-1)), and net CO₂ exchange (2 400 g CO₂ . m(-2).yr(-1)) were observed for intensively managed grasslands and high-yield crops, and are comparable to or higher than those for forest ecosystems, excluding some tropical forests. On average, 80% of the nonforest sites were apparent sinks for atmospheric CO₂, with mean net uptake of 700 g CO₂ . m(-2).yr(-1) for intensive grasslands and 933 g CO₂ . m(-2).d(-1) for croplands. However, part of these apparent sinks is accumulated in crops and forage, which are carbon pools that are harvested, transported, and decomposed off site. Therefore, although agricultural fields may be predominantly sinks for atmospheric CO₂, this does not imply that they are necessarily increasing their carbon stock

No abstract