FLUXNET is a global network of micrometeorological flux measurement sites that measure the exchanges of carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy between the biosphere and atmosphere. At present over 140 sites are operating on a long-term and continuous basis. Vegetation under study includes temperate conifer and broadleaved (deciduous and evergreen) forests, tropical and boreal forests, crops, grasslands, chaparral, wetlands, and tundra. Sites exist on five continents and their latitudinal distribution ranges from 70°N to 30°S. FLUXNET has several primary functions. First, it provides infrastructure for compiling, archiving, and distributing carbon, water, and energy flux measurement, and meteorological, plant, and soil data to the science community. (Data and site information are available online at the FLUXNET Web site, http://www-eosdis.ornl.gov/FLUXNET/.) Second, the project supports calibration and flux intercomparison activities. This activity ensures that data from the regional networks are intercomparable. And third, FLUXNET supports the synthesis, discussion, and communication of ideas and data by supporting project scientists, workshops, and visiting scientists. The overarching goal is to provide information for validating computations of net primary productivity, evaporation, and energy absorption that are being generated by sensors mounted on the NASA Terra satellite. Data being compiled by FLUXNET are being used to quantify and compare magnitudes and dynamics of annual ecosystem carbon and water balances, to quantify the response of stand-scale carbon dioxide and water vapor flux densities to controlling biotic and abiotic factors, and to validate a hierarchy of soil-plant-atmosphere trace gas exchange models. Findings so far include 1) net C0 2 exchange of temperate broadleaved forests increases by about 5.7 g C m~2 day-1 for each additional day that the growing season is extended; 2) the sensitivity of net ecosystem C0 2 exchange to sunlight doubles if the sky is cloudy rather than clear; 3) the spectrum of C0 2 flux density exhibits peaks at timescales of days, weeks, and years, and a spectral gap exists at the month timescale; 4) the optimal temperature of net C0 2 exchange varies with mean summer temperature; and 5) stand age affects carbon dioxide and water vapor flux densities.

A comprehensive evaluation of energy balance closure is performed across 22 sites and 50 site-years in FLUXNET, a network of eddy covariance sites measuring long-term carbon and energy fluxes in contrasting ecosystems and climates. Energy balance closure was evaluated by statistical regression of turbulent energy fluxes (sensible and latent heat (LE)) against available energy (net radiation, less the energy stored) and by solving for the energy balance ratio, the ratio of turbulent energy fluxes to available energy. These methods indicate a general lack of closure at most sites, with a mean imbalance in the order of 20%. The imbalance was prevalent in all measured vegetation types and in climates ranging from Mediterranean to temperate and arctic. There were no clear differences between sites using open and closed path infrared gas analyzers. At a majority of sites closure improved with turbulent intensity (friction velocity), but lack of total closure was still prevalent under most conditions. The imbalance was greatest during nocturnal periods. The results suggest that estimates of the scalar turbulent fluxes of sensible and LE are underestimated and/or that available energy is overestimated. The implications on interpreting long-term CO 2 fluxes at FLUXNET sites depends on whether the imbalance results primarily from general errors associated * Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-510-642-2874; fax: +1-510-643-5098. E-mail address: baldocchi@nature.berkeley.edu (D. Baldocchi).0168-1923/02/$ -see front matter. Published by Elsevier Science B.V. PII: S 0 1 6 8 -1 9 2 3 ( 0 2 ) 0 0 1 0 9 -0 224 K. Wilson et al. / Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 113 (2002) with the eddy covariance technique or from errors in calculating the available energy terms. Although it was not entirely possible to critically evaluate all the possible sources of the imbalance, circumstantial evidence suggested a link between the imbalance and CO 2 fluxes. For a given value of photosynthetically active radiation, the magnitude of CO 2 uptake was less when the energy imbalance was greater. Similarly, respiration (estimated by nocturnal CO 2 release to the atmosphere) was significantly less when the energy imbalance was greater. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.

Heightened awareness of global change issues within both science and political communities has increased interest in using the global network of eddy covariance flux towers to more fully understand the impacts of natural and anthropogenic phenomena on the global carbon balance. Comparisons of net ecosystem exchange (F NEE ) responses are being made among biome types, phenology patterns, and stress conditions. The comparisons are usually performed on annual sums of F NEE ; however, the average data coverage during a year is only 65%. Therefore, robust and consistent gap filling methods are required.We review several methods of gap filling and apply them to data sets available from the EUROFLUX and AmeriFlux databases. The methods are based on mean diurnal variation (MDV), look-up tables (LookUp), and nonlinear regressions (Regr.), and the impact of different gap filling methods on the annual sum of F NEE is investigated. The difference between annual F NEE filled by MDV compared to F NEE filled by Regr. ranged from −45 to +200 g C m −2 per year (MDV−Regr.). Comparing LookUp and Regr. methods resulted in a difference (LookUp−Regr.) ranging from −30 to +150 g C m −2 per year.We also investigated the impact of replacing measurements at night, when turbulent mixing is insufficient. The nighttime correction for low friction velocities (u * ) shifted annual F NEE on average by +77 g C m −2 per year, but in certain cases as much as +185 g C m −2 per year.Our results emphasize the need to standardize gap filling-methods for improving the comparability of flux data products from regional and global flux networks.

Bakwin, P.; Berbigier, P.; Davis, K.; Dolman, A. J.; Falk, M.; Fuentes, J. D.; Goldstein, A.; Granier, A.; Grelle, A.; Hollinger, D.; Janssens, I. A.; Jarvis, P.; Jensen, N. O.; Katul, G.; Mahli, K.; Matteucci, G.; Meyers, T.; Monson, R.; Munger, W.; Oechel, W.; Olson, R.; Pilegaard, K.; Paw U, K. T.; Thorgeirsson, H.; Valentini, R.; Verma, Shashi; Vesala, T.; Wilson, K.; and Wofsy, S., "Environmental controls over carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange of terrestrial vegetation" (2002 B.E. Law et al. / Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 113 (2002) 97-120 AbstractThe objective of this research was to compare seasonal and annual estimates of CO 2 and water vapor exchange across sites in forests, grasslands, crops, and tundra that are part of an international network called FLUXNET, and to investigating the responses of vegetation to environmental variables. FLUXNETs goals are to understand the mechanisms controlling the exchanges of CO 2 , water vapor and energy across a spectrum of time and space scales, and to provide information for modeling of carbon and water cycling across regions and the globe. At a subset of sites, net carbon uptake (net ecosystem exchange, the net of photosynthesis and respiration) was greater under diffuse than under direct radiation conditions, perhaps because of a more efficient distribution of non-saturating light conditions for photosynthesis, lower vapor pressure deficit limitation to photosynthesis, and lower respiration associated with reduced temperature. The slope of the relation between monthly gross ecosystem production and evapotranspiration was similar between biomes, except for tundra vegetation, showing a strong linkage between carbon gain and water loss integrated over the year (slopes = 3.4 g CO 2 /kg H 2 O for grasslands, 3.2 for deciduous broadleaf forests, 3.1 for crops, 2.4 for evergreen conifers, and 1.5 for tundra vegetation). The ratio of annual ecosystem respiration to gross photosynthesis averaged 0.83, with lower values for grasslands, presumably because of less investment in respiring plant tissue compared with forests. Ecosystem respiration was weakly correlated with mean annual temperature across biomes, in spite of within site sensitivity over shorter temporal scales. Mean annual temperature and site water balance explained much of the variation in gross photosynthesis. Water availability limits leaf area index over the long-term, and inter-annual climate variability can limit carbon uptake below the potential of the leaf area present.

[1] Clouds and aerosols alter the proportion of diffuse radiation in global solar radiation reaching the Earth's surface. It is known that diffuse and direct beam radiation differ in the way they transfer through plant canopies and affect the summation of nonlinear processes like photosynthesis differently than what would occur at the leaf scale. We compared the relative efficiencies of canopy photosynthesis to diffuse and direct photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) for a Scots pine forest, an aspen forest, a mixed deciduous forest, a tallgrass prairie and a winter wheat crop. The comparison was based on the seasonal patterns of the parameters that define the canopy photosynthetic responses to diffuse PAR and those that define the responses to direct PAR. These parameters were inferred from half-hourly tower CO 2 flux measurements. We found that: (1) diffuse radiation results in higher light use efficiencies by plant canopies; (2) diffuse radiation has much less tendency to cause canopy photosynthetic saturation; (3) the advantages of diffuse radiation over direct radiation increase with radiation level; (4) temperature as well as vapor pressure deficit can cause different responses in diffuse and direct canopy photosynthesis, indicating that their impacts on terrestrial ecosystem carbon assimilation may depend on radiation regimes and thus sky conditions. These findings call for different treatments of diffuse and direct radiation in models of global primary production, and studies of the roles of clouds and aerosols in global carbon cycle.