The effects of occlusive portal vein thrombosis (PVT) on the survival of patients with cirrhosis are unknown. This was a retrospective cohort study at a single center. The main exposure variable was the presence of occlusive PVT. The primary outcome measure was time-dependent mortality. A total of 3295 patients were analyzed, and 148 (4.5%) had PVT. Variables independently predictive of mortality from the time of liver transplant evaluation included age [hazard ratio (HR), 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-1.03], Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.08-1.11), hepatitis C (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.24-1.68), and PVT (HR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.97-3.51). Variables independently associated with the risk of mortality from the time of liver transplant listing included age (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), transplantation (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81), MELD (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10), hepatitis C (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.18-1.90), and PVT (1.99; 95% CI, 1.25-3.16). The presence of occlusive PVT at the time of liver transplantation was associated with an increased risk of death at 30 days (odds ratio, 7.39; 95% CI, 2.39-22.83). In conclusion, patients with cirrhosis complicated by PVT have an increased risk of death. Liver Transpl 16:83-90, 2010.
For more than two decades, papillary renal cell carcinoma has been recognized as a possible distinct clinicopathologic subtype of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the histologic criteria for its diagnosis and the clinical outcome are still debated. In an attempt to clarify the diagnostic criteria and resolve issues pertaining to biologic potential, we have evaluated the histologic spectrum of 62 papillary RCCs and assessed significance of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters (Fuhrrman's nuclear grade [NG], pathologic stage [Robson and TNM], tumor size, multifocality, necrosis, and foam cells) and correlated these with outcome. The mean age of patients was 61.8 years (range 22-83), and males were more commonly affected (1.8:1). Grossly, most tumors were well circumscribed, averaged 6.7 cm in size (range 1.8-18), and were predominantly localized to the renal poles (polar vs. mid-renal, 3:1). Multifocality was a prominent feature (24 cases), and in three cases tumors were bilateral. Microscopically, papillary RCCs were predominantly papillary or tubulopapillary, often with a thick fibrous capsule, foam cells, necrosis, hemorrhage, and multifocality. Thirty-five percent of these tumors were low grade (NG I and II) and 65% high grade (NG III and IV). Sixteen of these tumors presented in a higher stage (stages III and IV), and the overall stage correlated with NG (chi 2, p = 0.009). Tumors were further distinguished by cytoplasmic features: eosinophilic (42%), basophilic (34%) and mixed (24%). Eosinophilic tumors were predominantly high grade, and basophilic tumors low grade (chi 2, p = 0.000). A mean follow-up of 57 months showed progression (metastasis, recurrence, or death due to disease) in 21%, whereas 63% were free of disease. Eleven percent died of unrelated causes, and 5% were lost to follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that both high NG and stage were strongly associated with decreased survival (p = 0.0000 each), as were decreased foam cell (p = 0.0025) and vascular invasion (p = 0.0002). Comparison of 196 reported cases of papillary RCC, including the current series, with reported large series of conventional RCC indicates that papillary RCC usually presents at an early stage, and stage I (Robson) papillary RCC has better 5 year survival rates (87%-100%) than does RCC of the same stage (65-75%). The overall 5 years survival rate for papillary carcinoma (82-90%) was also higher than that of conventional RCC (44-54%). In a Cox proportional hazard regression model, TNM stage appeared to be the only significant variable (p = 0.0000, hazard ratio 10.1) in predicting outcome among papillary RCC. Based on this experience, we conclude that (a) papillary RCC is a malignant tumor, with a tendency to present at a lower stage, but with a distinct potential for progression and aggressive behavior; (b) stratification of these tumors according to cell type, amount of foam cells, presence or absence of vascular invasion, nuclear grade, and pathologic stage provides useful prognostic information; (c)...
A statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative supported by a third-party payer showed significant improvement in quality and high levels of participant satisfaction.
Objective-To determine the utility of adding oral non-absorbable antibiotics to the bowel prep prior to elective colon surgery Summary background data-Bowel preparation prior to colectomy remains controversial. We hypothesized that mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics (compared to without) was associated with lower rates of SSI. Methods-24Michigan hospitals participated in the Michigan Surgical Quality CollaborativeColectomy Best Practices Project. Standard peri-operative data, bowel preparation process measures and C.difficile colitis outcomes were prospectively collected. Among patients receiving mechanical bowel preparation, a logistic regression model generated a propensity score that allowed us to match cases differing only in whether or not they had received oral antibiotics.Results-Overall, 2011 elective colectomies were performed over 16 months. Mechanical bowel prep without oral antibiotics was administered to 49.6% of patients, while 36.4% received a mechanical prep and oral antibiotics. Propensity analysis created 370 paired cases (differing only in receiving oral antibiotics). Patients receiving oral antibiotics were less likely to have any SSI (4.5% vs.11.8%, p = 0.0001), to have an organ space infection (1.8% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.044) and to have a superficial SSI (2.6% vs. 7.6%, p = 0.001). Patients receiving bowel prep with oral antibiotics were also less likely to have a prolonged ileus (3.9% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.011) and had similar rates of C. difficile colitis (1.3% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.58).Conclusions-Most patients in Michigan receive mechanical bowel preparation prior to elective colectomy. Oral antibiotics may reduce the incidence of SSI.
Concern exists that liver transplant center substance abuse policies may have an inappropriate and disproportionate impact on marijuana users. Our hypothesis is that patients with chronic liver disease who were marijuana users will have inferior survival. This is a retrospective (1999-2007) cohort study. The primary outcome measure is time-dependent, adjusted patient survival from the time of liver transplant evaluation. The primary exposure variable is a positive cannabinoid toxicology screen during the liver transplant evaluation period. Overall, 155 patients qualified as marijuana users while 1334 patients were marijuana non-users. Marijuana users were significantly (p < 0.05) younger (48.3 vs. 52.1), more likely to be male (78.1% vs. 63.0%), have hepatitis C (63.9% vs. 40.6%) and were less likely to receive a transplant (21.8% vs. 14.8%). Marijuana users were more likely to use tobacco, narcotics, benzodiazepines, amphetamines, cocaine or barbiturates (p < 0.05). Unadjusted survival rates were similar between cohorts. Upon multivariate analysis, MELD score, hepatitis C and transplantation were significantly associated with survival, while marijuana use was not (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.78-1.54). We conclude that patients who did and did not use marijuana had similar survival rates. Current substance abuse policies do not seen to systematically expose marijuana users to additional risk of mortality.
Morphologic studies of gastric stromal tumors (GSTs) indicate that mitotic counts (MCs) and tumor size are major discriminants predictive of biologic behavior. The authors evaluated the tumor proliferation of GSTs with anti-proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA; DAKO clone PC10, DAKO Corporation, Carpinteria, CA) for correlation with MCs, histologic cell type, and clinical outcome. Fifty-eight tumors ranging from 1.5 to 45 cm in size were selected for clinicopathologic assessment. Mitotic activity was counted per 50 high-power fields (MC). For this study, combined parameters of MC and tumor size were used to categorize tumors into three groups: (1) benign: MC less than 5, tumor smaller than 5 cm; (2) borderline: MC less than 5, tumor larger than 5 cm; and (3) malignant: MC greater than 5, tumor any size. The PCNA tumor proliferation index (TPI) was assessed from evaluation of 200 tumor cells per case and expressed as the percentage of cells with positive results. Clinical follow-up was available in 45 cases. None of the 19 benign or 16 borderline tumors recurred or metastasized, whereas 7 of 10 malignant tumors metastasized and 1 of 10 recurred. The mean PCNA TPI values among benign (11.2%), borderline (16%), and malignant (34.5%) tumors were significantly different (P = 0.0002, Kruskal-Wallis test). When the pathologic tumor categories were compared, the mean TPI of benign tumors was significantly different from that of borderline tumors (P = 0.0306, Kruskal-Wallis), and the TPI of borderline tumors was different from that of the malignant tumors (P = 0.0060, Kruskal-Wallis test). The Spearman rank correlation showed a significant relationship between the MC and PCNA TPI (P = 0.0003, r = 0.4543). Logistic regression analysis showed that the TPI, independent of MC and size, contributed significantly (P = 0.00295) to the prediction of outcome. In the malignant group, the mean TPI for malignant tumors with metastases (43.6%) was significantly different (P = 0.0411, Kruskal-Wallis test) from that of malignant tumors without metastases (including the case with probable recurrence) (11.83%). No correlation was found when PCNA TPIs for epithelioid GCTs were compared with those of spindle cell GSTs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.