Occupancy of the T-cell antigen receptor is insufficient to induce T-cell activation optimally; a second co-stimulatory signal is required. Exposure of T-cell clones to complexes of antigen with major histocompatibility complex molecules in the absence of the co-stimulatory signal induces a state of clonal anergy. This requirement for two stimuli for T-cell activation could have an important role in vivo in establishing peripheral tolerance to antigens not encountered in the thymus. The receptor on T cells required for the co-stimulatory stimulus involved in the prevention of anergy has not been identified. The human T-cell antigen CD28 provides a signal that can synergize with T-cell antigen receptor stimulation in activating T cells to proliferate and secrete lymphokines. Here we report that a monoclonal antibody against the murine homologue of CD28 (ref. 7; J.A.G. et al., manuscript in preparation) can provide a co-stimulatory signal to naive CD4+ T cells and to T-cell clones. Moreover, we demonstrate that this co-stimulatory signal can block the induction of anergy in T-cell clones.

Recombinant adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) is a common vector used in human gene therapy protocols. We characterized the humoral immune response to AAV and observed that 80% of normal human subjects have anti-AAV antibodies and that 18% have neutralizing antibodies. To analyze the effect of neutralizing antibodies on AAV readministration, we attempted to deliver recombinant AAV expressing human factor IX (AAVhFIX) intraportally into the livers of mice which had been preexposed to AAV and shown to harbor a neutralizing antibody response. While all naive control mice expressed hFIX following administration of AAV-hFIX, none of the mice with preexisting immunity expressed hFIX, even after transient immunosuppression at the time of the second administration with anti-CD4 or anti-CD40L antibodies. This suggests that preexisting immunity to AAV, as measured by a neutralizing antibody response, may limit AAV-mediated gene delivery. Using human sera in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for AAV and a capsid peptide scan library to block antibody binding, we mapped seven regions of the AAV capsid containing immunogenic epitopes. Using pools of these peptides to inhibit the binding of neutralizing antibodies, we have identified a subset of six peptides which potentially reconstitute a single neutralizing epitope. This information may allow the design of reverse genetic approaches to circumvent the preexisting immunity that can be encountered in some individuals.

BackgroundT cells engineered to express chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) have established efficacy in the treatment of B-cell malignancies, but their relevance in solid tumors remains undefined. Here we report results of the first human trials of CAR-T cells in the treatment of solid tumors performed in the 1990s.MethodsPatients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) were treated in two phase 1 trials with first-generation retroviral transduced CAR-T cells targeting tumor-associated glycoprotein (TAG)-72 and including a CD3-zeta intracellular signaling domain (CART72 cells). In trial C-9701 and C-9702, CART72 cells were administered in escalating doses up to 1010 total cells; in trial C-9701 CART72 cells were administered by intravenous infusion. In trial C-9702, CART72 cells were administered via direct hepatic artery infusion in patients with colorectal liver metastases. In both trials, a brief course of interferon-alpha (IFN-α) was given with each CART72 infusion to upregulate expression of TAG-72.ResultsFourteen patients were enrolled in C-9701 and nine in C-9702. CART72 manufacturing success rate was 100% with an average transduction efficiency of 38%. Ten patients were treated in CC-9701 and 6 in CC-9702. Symptoms consistent with low-grade, cytokine release syndrome were observed in both trials without clear evidence of on target/off tumor toxicity. Detectable, but mostly short-term (≤14 weeks), persistence of CART72 cells was observed in blood; one patient had CART72 cells detectable at 48 weeks. Trafficking to tumor tissues was confirmed in a tumor biopsy from one of three patients. A subset of patients had 111Indium-labeled CART72 cells injected, and trafficking could be detected to liver, but T cells appeared largely excluded from large metastatic deposits. Tumor biomarkers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and TAG-72 were measured in serum; there was a precipitous decline of TAG-72, but not CEA, in some patients due to induction of an interfering antibody to the TAG-72 binding domain of humanized CC49, reflecting an anti-CAR immune response. No radiologic tumor responses were observed.ConclusionThese findings demonstrate the relative safety of CART72 cells. The limited persistence supports the incorporation of co-stimulatory domains in the CAR design and the use of fully human CAR constructs to mitigate immunogenicity.

The present study sought to determine the impact of the route of administration of an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector encoding human factor IX (hFIX) on the induction of an immune response against the vector and its xenogenic transgene product, hFIX. Increasing doses of AAV-hFIX were administered by different routes to C57Bl/6 mice, which typically demonstrate significant immune tolerance to hFIX. The route of delivery had a profound impact on serum hFIX levels as well as the induction of an anti-hFIX humoral immune response. At all dose levels tested, delivery of AAV-hFIX by an intramuscular (IM) route induced an antibody response against the human FIX protein and no hFIX was detected in the serum of animals even at doses of 2 ؋ 10 11 DNA viral particles (vp) of AAV-hFIX. This was in stark contrast to the mice that received AAV-hFIX by intraportal vein (IPV) administration. No anti-hFIX inhibitors were observed in any of these mice and therapeutic levels of hFIX were detected in the serum of all mice that received doses of 2 ؋ 10 10 vp AAV-hFIX and higher. When pre-existing neutralizing immunity to AAV was established in mice, AAV-hFIX administration by either the IM or IPV routes did not result in detectable serum hFIX. Although hFIX expression was not observed in mice with pre-existing neutralizing immunity to AAV, an anti-hFIX response was induced in all of the animals that received AAV-hFIX by the IM route. This was not observed in the preimmune mice that received AAV-hFIX by IPV administration. These results suggest that the threshold of inducing an immune response against a secreted transgene product, in this case the xenoprotein hFIX, is lower when the vector is administered by the IM route even in animals with pre-existing immunity to AAV. IntroductionA concern for those seeking to use gene therapy to correct diseases stemming from genetic deficiencies has been whether the expression of the product of a missing gene will result in an immune response against the "foreign" gene product. This is a complex issue where contributions of the vector, the transgene, and the patients' immunologic background need to be considered. The area that has occupied the greatest amount of time is the immunogenicity of the viral vectors that are used to deliver potentially therapeutic transgenes. Many studies have shown that the immunogenicity of the proteins encoded by endogenous viral genes can stimulate not only the destruction of the transduced cell, but may also lead to the cross-priming of an immune response against the transgene product itself. Recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vectors are thought to be well suited for gene replacement therapy because they are deleted of all wild-type AAV genes. In addition, AAV serotype 2 vectors are inefficient at transducing potent antigen-presenting dendritic cells (DCs). 1 These features greatly reduce the immunogenicity of AAV vectors.Despite these advantages of AAV vectors, the immune interaction of the host with the transgene and vector is more complex than can b...