Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) has been increasingly accepted as a noninvasive marker of regional tissue oxygenation despite concerns of imprecision and wide limits of agreement (LOA) with invasive oximetry. New generation absolute monitors may have improved accuracy compared with trend monitors. We sought to compare the concordance with invasive venous oximetry of a new generation absolute NIRS-oximeter (FORESIGHT ELITE; CASMED, Branford, CT) with a modern widely used trend monitor (INVOS 5100C; Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN).
DESIGN:Prospective single-center study.
SETTING:Tertiary pediatric heart center.
PATIENTS:Children undergoing elective cardiac catheterization under general anesthesia. Time-paired venous oximetry samples (jugular and renal) were compared with NIRS-derived oximetry by two monitors using regression and Bland-Altman analysis.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:We enrolled 36 children (19 female, 10 cyanotic) with median age 4.1 years (25-75%, 2.5-7.8 yr) and weight 16.7 kg (12.3-29.1 kg). The absolute difference between NIRS-derived and invasive jugular oximetry was less than 10% in 67% of occasions for both monitors. Correlation was fair (Spearman r s = 0.40; p = 0.001) for the FORESIGHT ELITE and poor (r s = 0.06; p = 0.71) for the INVOS 5100C. Bias and LOA were +6.7% (+22%, -9%) versus +1.3% (LOA = +24%, -21%), respectively. The absolute difference between NIRS-derived and invasive renal oximetry was less than 10% in 80% of occasions with moderate correlation (r s = 0.57; p < 0.001) for the FORESIGHT ELITE and in 61% of occasions with moderate correlation (r s = 0.58; p < 0.001) for the INVOS 5100C; bias and LOA were +3.6% (+19%, -12%) and -1.4 % (+27%, -30%), respectively. NIRS correlation with renal venous oximetry was worse for cyanotic versus noncyanotic patients (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS:Concordance and LOA of NIRS-derived oximetry with invasive venous oximetry in the cerebral and renal vascular beds was suboptimal for clinical decision-making. Cyanosis adversely affected NIRS performance in the renal site.
Hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) is a rare and severe congenital cardiac defect. Approximately 1000 infants are born with HLHS in the United States every year. Healthcare collaboratives over the last decade have focused on sharing patient experiences and techniques in an effort to improve outcomes. In 2010, cardiologists and patient families joined together to improve the care of HLHS patients by forming the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative (NPC-QIC). Sixty-six of the approximately 110 institutions caring for patients with HLHS in the United States and Canada are now members of NPC-QIC. In 2017, cardiovascular perfusionists joined the collaborative as another specialty involved in the care of HLHS patients. Perfusionists and cardiac surgeons developed the collaborative's first conduct of perfusion survey for the Norwood Stage 1 procedure, specifically targeting the provision of cardiopulmonary bypass for patients with HLHS. This manuscript discusses the results of this survey, unveiling a significant variance in the conduct of perfusion for this patient population.
The benchtop blood analyzer is the gold standard for blood oxygen saturation (SO) and hemoglobin (Hb) analysis. However, the benchtop analyzer only provides values at a given point in time. In the field of cardiovascular perfusion and the practice of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), continuous measurement of SvO and hemoglobin values have become commonplace. Two devices currently available which monitor these values are the Terumo CDI 500 and Spectrum Medical M4. A retrospective study was conducted to examine the accuracy of the M4 technology and the CDI 500 as they compare to each other and the ABL90 FLEX, a benchtop blood gas analyzer. The data revealed the magnitude of mean differences were small, even when significant. However, the 95% Limits of Agreement were too large for either device to allow substitution of the CDI 500 and M4 hemoglobin or SvO values for ABL90 values. As recommended by the manufacturers, the CDI 500 and M4 should only be used as a trending device.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.