Introduction: The process of scientific publishing changed greatly in the past decades. The authors aimed to get insight into the time required for articles to be accepted and released online in high-impacted ophthalmology journals.Methods: Comprehensive review of all original articles published by eight ophthalmology journals during a one-year period was performed for 2020 and 2005. Time taken from submission to acceptance and the first online release of the article was abstracted and analyzed.Results: A total of 3110 articles were reviewed. In 2020, the overall median time from submission to acceptance (AT) was 119 days (IQR 83-168) and 30 days (10-71) from acceptance to the first online release of the article (OP). AT increased by 7.3% from 2005 to 2020, whereas OP reduced by 73%. Publications, which the corresponding author was affiliated with US-located institution had shorter both AT and OP in 2005 and 2020. The author's specialty in ophthalmology had an inconclusive impact on AT and OP. Papers with multiple affiliated institutions had shorter AT and OP in both 2005 and 2020; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Conclusion:This study demonstrated that increasing pressure on authors, editors, and reviewers to publish articles and journals with high impact factor (IF) significantly influenced publication times in ophthalmology journals. Inflation of research papers was associated with rising AT time. A significant decrease in OP time was potentially explained by the editor's demand to achieve decent journal IF. This article brings to light relative publication times in the ophthalmology scientific journals.

No abstract

This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.

Iron deficiency (ID) and iron status in non-anemic patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk without a history of cardiovascular diseases is still weakly explored. In this study, the authors evaluated the most common ID definitions in this group of patients. A total of 533 participants from the

Background. Left ventricular (LV) systolic impairment, particularly in the longitudinal direction, is considered an early and sensitive marker of hypertensive heart disease and increased cardiovascular risk. The evidence indicates that aortic stiffness and central hemodynamic factors are important determinants of LV performance, mediating the interaction between the heart and vascular load. Despite the existence of cross-sectional analyses linking central blood pressure (BP) parameters with LV mechanics, no longitudinal data are available which include serial measurements in the course of antihypertensive treatment. Objectives.To investigate the associations between changes in LV longitudinal and circumferential function with alterations in arterial hemodynamics and ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) in patients with uncomplicated hypertension during a 12-month follow-up. Materials and methods.In this retrospective study, 216 patients (age 64.3 ±7.6 years) underwent echocardiography including left ventricular longitudinal (GLS) and circumferential strain (GCS) analysis, brachial BP measurements, VAC (combining echocardiography and brachial BP), and arterial hemodynamics using radial tonometry at baseline and after 12 months of antihypertensive therapy. Patients were grouped into 2 subsets: with improvement in GLS (n = 103) and with deterioration in GLS (n = 113).Results. No significant differences were observed in the majority of cardiovascular, demographic or clinical characteristics between the groups. The subset with improvement in GLS demonstrated more favorable changes over follow-up in pulse wave velocity (p = 0.03), central augmentation pressure (p = 0.01) and ventricular-arterial coupling (p = 0.04) compared to patients showing deterioration in GLS. In the multivariable analysis, independent determinants of changes in GLS were: GLS at baseline (−0.48; p < 0.001), changes from baseline to follow-up in central augmentation pressure (−0.29; p = 0.002) and ventriculararterial coupling (−0.25; p = 0.004). Independent determinants of analogous changes in GCS were: GCS at baseline (−0.46; p < 0.001) and changes in central augmentation pressure (−0.22; p = 0.02). Conclusions.Left ventricular longitudinal and circumferential functional remodeling over time in hypertensive patients is associated with arterial hemodynamics and ventricular-arterial coupling.