Purpose: Trainee exposure to craniofacial pathology can be limited due to rare disease presentation, revealing a need for tools that assist in visualizing complex 3D pathologic anatomy. 3D-printed models show potential as a useful aid, allowing for physical manipulation and hands-on experience. This study investigates their educational value in teaching craniofacial pathology and surgical repair. Methods: Forty-four medical students randomly assigned to a control group or model group were given a PowerPoint presentation-based module on craniosynostosis and surgical repair. The model group was also provided with 3D-printed models of sagittal, metopic, and bicoronal synostosis, created using patient-specific preoperative computed tomography data. A survey using the Likert scale evaluated participants’ learning experience. Pre- and postmodule scores on a 10-question multiple choice quiz were recorded. Results: The survey showed that students in the model group reported better understanding of the anatomy (4.86 ± 0.15 versus 4.26 ± 0.22; P = 0.0001) and visualization of the pathology (4.76 ± 0.23 versus 4.26 ± 0.25; P = 0.0064), gaining an improved understanding of surgical approach (4.38 ± 0.37 versus 3.83 ± 0.29; P = 0.0266), which was more effectively taught (4.24 ± 0.33 versus 3.30 ± 0.38; P = 0.0007) with the 3D-printed models. The mean pre- and post-module quiz scores between groups were similar. Conclusion: 3D-printed models demonstrated an improved learning experience for medical students as shown by survey. These findings suggest a potential use for 3D-printed models in medical education of craniofacial pathology and surgery.
Identifying which cranial defects among children warrant surgical repair is integral to providing adequate protection of the skull whereas minimizing exposure to surgical complications. This review examines the available evidence regarding the role of defect size in determining the appropriateness of nonsurgical versus surgical management. Methods: An electronic literature review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify publications that provided rationales for nonsurgical management of cranial defects in the pediatric population based on size. Titles and abstracts were reviewed by the authors to determine eligibility for full-text analysis. Ineligible studies were categorized and relevant data from fully analyzed texts were recorded. Results: Of the 523 articles that were reviewed, 500 were ineligible for full-text analysis due to the following most common reasons: no cranial defect described (227, 45%), did not discuss management of cranial defects (68, 14%), or surgery was performed on all defects in evaluation of a technique or protocol (86, 17%). Ten publications provided relevant data. The suggested size below which surgery was not recommended varied widely between articles. Beyond the age of 1 to 2 years, no general agreement on recommended management in children was found. Craniofacial surgeons had divergent views on the minimum diameter for a ''critical'' defect and the size for which surgical repair is necessary. Conclusions: Little guidance or consensus exists regarding the indications for surgical correction of cranial defects based on the size of the defect. Objective data is needed to classify ''clinically critical defects'' in the pediatric population.
Background: Effective medical record documentation is imperative for both patient care and reimbursement for care provided. The purpose of this study was to compare coding/billing patterns for plastic surgery consultations before and after implementation of a standardized documentation protocol. Methods: Standardized hand, facial trauma, and general plastic surgery consult note templates were created. Following institutional approval, records were reviewed for all plastic surgery consultations from January to October 2019. Template notes were universally implemented in July 2019. Medical coding was performed by a certified professional coder using the 1995 Evaluation and Management Review Worksheet. Coding/billing patterns between groups were compared with and without standardized documentation using univariate analysis. Results: Seventy-five consecutive preimplementation consult notes and 75 consecutive postimplementation consult notes were selected for review. Each group included 25 hand, 25 facial trauma, and 25 general plastic surgery consultation notes. The history and physical examination components of the visit code were more frequently coded as “comprehensive”postimplementation (P = 0.000). There was no significant difference in coding for medical decision making between the two groups (P = 0.340). The final visit code was significantly higher in the postimplementation group (45.3% 99254/99284 versus 2.7%, P = 0.000), and the charges were significantly higher post implementation—average charge per consult $250 versus $203 (P = 0.000) with a 22.8% increase in total charges generated. Conclusion: Utilization of standardized consultation note templates increases the accuracy of coding and associated billing of inpatient and emergency department plastic surgery consultations through documentation and reflection of level of service provided.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.