A B S T R A C T PurposeThis multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of decitabine with treatment choice (TC) in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and poor-or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. Patients and MethodsPatients (N ϭ 485) age Ն 65 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive decitabine 20 mg/m 2 per day as a 1-hour intravenous infusion for five consecutive days every 4 weeks or TC (supportive care or cytarabine 20 mg/m 2 per day as a subcutaneous injection for 10 consecutive days every 4 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival (OS); the secondary end point was the complete remission (CR) rate plus the CR rate without platelet recovery (CRp). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. ResultsThe primary analysis with 396 deaths (81.6%) showed a nonsignificant increase in median OS with decitabine (7.7 months; 95% CI, 6.2 to 9.2) versus TC (5.0 months; 95% CI, 4.3 to 6.3; P ϭ .108; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.04). An unplanned analysis with 446 deaths (92%) indicated the same median OS (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99; nominal P ϭ .037). The CR rate plus CRp was 17.8% with decitabine versus 7.8% with TC (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.8; P ϭ .001). AEs were similar for decitabine and cytarabine, although patients received a median of four cycles of decitabine versus two cycles of TC. The most common drug-related AEs with decitabine were thrombocytopenia (27%) and neutropenia (24%). ConclusionIn older patients with AML, decitabine improved response rates compared with standard therapies without major differences in safety. An unplanned survival analysis showed a benefit for decitabine, which was not observed at the time of the primary analysis.

Summary Background Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) was the first example of antibody directed chemotherapy in cancer and developed for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia. Its role has been unclear. Five randomised trials where it was combined with standard induction chemotherapy in adults have produced different results. In an effort to clarify the level of benefit, if any, and in which patients outcomes might be improved, an individual patient data meta-analysis of these 5 trials has been undertaken. Methods All randomised trials of GO in adults (age >15), given in conjunction with the first course of intensive induction chemotherapy for AML (excluding APL) were identified. In a collaboration between the groups involved, source data concerning demographics, treatment was requested in May 2013 and collected in 3325 randomised patients (median age 58). All trials were centrally randomised and open-label, with survival as primary endpoint. Analyses are presented by standard techniques, and within standardised risk groups Results Remission rates were not increased, but by significantly reducing the risk of relapse overall survival at 5 years was improved irrespective of patient age (30.7% vs 34.6%; HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.98), p=0.01). The survival benefit was particularly clear in those with favourable cytogenetics (55.2% vs 76.3%; HR0.47 (0.31-0.73), p=0.0005), but also observed in intermediate risk patients (34.1% vs 39.4%; HR 0.84 (0.75-0.95), p=0.007) Patients with adverse karyotype did not benefit overall or within any trial. Dose levels of 3mg/m2 were associated with less toxicity and equal efficacy. Interpretation GO can be safely added to conventional induction therapy. For patients who do not have adverse cytogenetics there is a significant survival benefit. These data suggest that the use of GO should be re-evaluated and the license status of GO may need to be reviewed. Role of funding source There was no funder for this meta-analysis.

Prognostic factors for response and survival in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients treated with azacitidine (AZA) remain largely unknown. Two hundred eighty-two consecutive high or intermediate-2 risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients received AZA in a compassionate, patient-named program. Diagnosis was RA/RARS/RCMD in 4%, RAEB-1 in 20%, RAEB-2 in 54%, and RAEB-t (AML with 21%-30% marrow blasts) in 22%. Cytogenetic risk was good in 31%, intermediate in 17%, and poor in 47%. Patients received AZA for a median of 6 cycles (1-52). Previous low-dose cytosine arabinoside treatment (P ‫؍‬ .009), bone marrow blasts > 15% (P ‫؍‬ .004), and abnormal karyotype (P ‫؍‬ .03) independently predicted lower response rates. Complex karyotype predicted shorter responses (P ‫؍‬ .0003). Performance status > 2, intermediate-and poor-risk cytogenetics, presence of circulating blasts, and red blood cell transfusion dependency > 4 units/8 weeks (all P < 10 ؊4 ) independently predicted poorer overall survival (OS). A prognostic score based on those factors discriminated 3 risk groups with median OS not reached, 15.0 and 6.1 months, respectively (P < 10 ؊4 ). This prognostic score was validated in an independent set of patients receiving AZA in the AZA-001 trial (P ‫؍‬ .003). Achievement of hematological improvement in patients who did not obtain complete or partial remission was associated with improved OS (P < 10 ؊4 ). In conclusion, routine tests can identify subgroups of patients with distinct prognosis with AZA treatment. (Blood. 2011; 117(2):403-411)

We describe the clinical, hematologic and genetic characteristics of a retrospective series of 126 subjects from 64 families with hereditary xerocytosis. Twelve patients from six families carried a KCNN4 mutation, five had the recurrent p.Arg352His mutation and one had a new deletion at the exon 7-intron 7 junction. Forty-nine families carried a PIEZO1 mutation, which was a known recurrent mutation in only one-third of the cases and private sequence variation in others; 12 new probably pathogenic missense mutations were identified. The two dominant features leading to diagnosis were hemolysis that persisted after splenectomy and hyperferritinemia, with an inconstant correlation with liver iron content assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. PIEZO1 -hereditary xerocytosis was characterized by compensated hemolysis in most cases, perinatal edema of heterogeneous severity in more than 20% of families and a major risk of post-splenectomy thrombotic events, including a high frequency of portal thrombosis. In KCNN4 -related disease, the main symptoms were more severe anemia, hemolysis and iron overload, with no clear sign of red cell dehydration; therefore, this disorder would be better described as a ‘Gardos channelopathy’. These data on the largest series to date indicate that PIEZO1 -hereditary xerocytosis and Gardos channelopathy are not the same disease although they share hemolysis, a high rate of iron overload and inefficient splenectomy. They demonstrate the high variability in clinical expression as well as genetic bases of PIEZO1 -hereditary xerocytosis. These results will help to improve the diagnosis of hereditary xerocytosis and to provide recommendations on the clinical management in terms of splenectomy, iron overload and pregnancy follow-up.

Key Points• In adult patients with core binding factor AML, intensified induction is not associated with a better outcome in the context of intensive postremission therapy.• Minimal residual disease, rather than KIT or FLT3 gene mutations, should be used to identify core binding factor AML patients at higher risk of relapse.Not all patients with core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) display a good outcome. Modern risk factors include KIT and/or FLT3 gene mutations and minimal residual disease (MRD) levels, but their respective values have never been prospectively assessed. A total of 198 CBF-AML patients were randomized between a reinforced and a standard induction course, followed by 3 high-dose cytarabine consolidation courses. MRD levels were monitored prospectively. Gene mutations were screened at diagnosis. Despite a more rapid MRD decrease after reinforced induction, induction arm did not influence relapse-free survival (RFS) (64% in both arms; P 5 .91). Higher WBC, KIT, and/or FLT3-ITD/TKD gene mutations, and a less than 3-log MRD reduction after first consolidation, were associated with a higher specific hazard of relapse, but MRD remained the sole prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. At 36 months, cumulative incidence of relapse and RFS were 22% vs 54% (P < .001) and 73% vs 44% (P < .001) in patients who achieved 3-log MRD reduction vs the others. These results suggest that MRD, rather than gene mutations, should be used for future treatment stratifications in CBF-AML patients. This trial was registered at EudraCT as #2006-005163-26 and at www. clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT 00428558. (Blood. 2013;121(12):2213-2223

No abstract

No abstract

A simplified prognostic score is presented based on the multivariate analysis of 138 refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) patients (median age 55 years, range: 19-70) receiving a combination of intensive chemotherapy þ Gemtuzumab as salvage regimen. Overall, 2-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 29±4% and 36 ± 4%, respectively. Disease status (relapse o12 months, including refractory patients), FLT3-ITD-positive status and high-risk cytogenetics were the three strongest independent adverse prognostic factors for OS and EFS in this series. We then defined three subgroups with striking different outcomes at 2 years: no adverse factor (favourable, N ¼ 36): OS 58%, EFS 45%; one adverse factor (intermediate, N ¼ 54): OS 37%, EFS 31%; two or three adverse factors (poor, N ¼ 43): OS 12%, EFS 12% (Po10 À4 , P ¼ 0.001). This new simplified Leukemia Prognostic Scoring System was then validated on an independent cohort of 111 refractory/relapsed AML patients. This new simplified prognostic score, using three clinical and biological parameters routinely applied, allow to discriminate around two third of the patients who should benefit from a salvage intensive regimen in the setting of refractory/relapsed AML patients. The other one third of the patients should receive investigational therapy.