No abstract

No abstract

Improving the reasoning skills of adolescents across the United States has become a major concern for educators and scientists who are dedicated to identifying evidence-based protocols to improve student outcome. This small sample randomized, control pilot study sought to determine the efficacy of higher-order cognitive training on gist-reasoning and fact-learning in an inner-city public middle school. The study compared gist-reasoning and fact-learning performances after training in a smaller sample when tested in Spanish, many of the students’ native language, versus English. The 54 eighth grade students who participated in this pilot study were enroled in an urban middle school, predominantly from lower socio-economic status families, and were primarily of minority descent. The students were randomized into one of three groups, one that learned cognitive strategies promoting abstraction of meaning, a group that learned rote memory strategies, or a control group to ascertain the impact of each program on gist-reasoning and fact-learning from text-based information. We found that the students who had cognitive strategy instruction that entailed abstraction of meaning significantly improved their gist-reasoning and fact-learning ability. The students who learned rote memory strategies significantly improved their fact-learning scores from a text but not gist-reasoning ability. The control group showed no significant change in either gist-reasoning or fact-learning ability. A trend toward significant improvement in overall reading scores for the group that learned to abstract meaning as well as a significant correlation between gist-reasoning ability and the critical thinking on a state-mandated standardized reading test was also found. There were no significant differences between English and Spanish performance of gist-reasoning and fact-learning. Our findings suggest that teaching higher-order cognitive strategies facilitates gist-reasoning ability and student learning.

Little is known about strategic learning ability in preteens and adolescents with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Strategic learning is the ability to combine and synthesize details to form abstracted gist-based meanings, a higher-order cognitive skill associated with frontal lobe functions and higher classroom performance. Summarization tasks were used to measure strategic learning ability through the production of abstracted gist-based concepts, and specific probes measured memory for explicit details. Twenty middle school-aged preteens and teenagers who sustained a moderate to severe TBI 1 year postinjury and a control group of 20 typically developing 10-to 15-year-old subjects participated in this study. The results revealed that the youth with moderate to severe TBI were able to recall specific details at a comparable level to the control group. However, the youth with TBI demonstrated significantly lower strategic learning competence, as manifested by a reduced ability to combine details into gist-based ideas. The present findings advance the notion that skills that have not yet developed at the time of brain injury or are in a stage of development may be particularly vulnerable to the long-term and lasting sequelae of TBI in youth, although a longitudinal study is needed to verify this claim.

No abstract