Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) can develop persistent (P-pHPT) or recurrent (R-pHPT) disease after parathyroidectomy. Before recommending reoperation, recurrence must be accurately identified because of the high risk of complications. Our study evaluates 18F-fluorocholine (18F-FCH) PET/CT and 4D-CT integrated in PET/4D-CT in patients with P-pHPT/R-pHPT. Patients with P-pHPT/R-pHPT investigated by 18F-FCH PET/4D-CT between May 2018 and March 2021 were retrospectively included. Forty-two patients were included, 37 of whom underwent 4D-CT. The sensitivity and detection rate (DR%) were 95% and 88% for 18F-FCH PET/CT and 70% and 63% for 4D-CT, respectively. PET/CT and 4D-CT were concordant in 18/24 glands and concordant and positive in 15/24 (63%) glands. Discordant results were obtained for 6/24 glands. The surgical success rate was 65%. PET/CT showed significantly higher sensitivity than 4D-CT. Dynamic CT allowed the identification of no additional glands missed by PET/CT, and the combination of the 2 techniques did not improve the sensitivity or DR%. 18F-FCH PET/CT appears to be a valuable technique to accurately detect hyperfunctioning parathyroid tissue in patients with P-pHPT/R-pHPT and is better than 4D-CT. Except for cases with doubtful locations of PET targets that may require 4D-CT for surgical guidance, standard nonenhanced 18F-FCH PET/CT can be effectively recommended in patients with P-pHPT/R-pHPT before reoperation.

Purpose Thyroid nodules frequently coexist with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). Because of the increasing use of 18F-fluorocholine (18F-FCH) PET/CT in patients with pHPT, evaluation of its clinical utility for thyroid nodules characterization in this population is of paramount importance. Herein, we investigate the value of dual-point 18F-FCH PET/CT in the diagnosis of thyroid cancer in patients referred for pHPT imaging who have thyroid nodules. Patients and Methods All pHPT patients who underwent a dual-time point 18F-FCH PET/CT (at 5 and 60 minutes postinjection) between July 2019 and December 2020 were analyzed. Only those with a thyroid nodule greater than 10-mm and pathological analysis (criterion standard) were included. Nodule-to-thyroid SUVmax ratio was calculated at the 2 study points, as well as the 18F-FCH washout index (WO%). Results Twenty-seven patients (32 nodules) were included in this study. The final diagnoses were as follows: 27 benign nodules including 2 NIFTPs (noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features) and 5 cancers of follicular origin. Early uptake ratio was significantly higher in malignant lesions than in benign nodules (P = 0.0008). Thyroid cancers were also characterized by a marked 18F-FCH washout index (WO% benign vs cancer: 2.9% ± 4.1% vs 45.5% ± 13.4%, P = 0.0001). Using a WO% threshold of 22.1%, 25/27 benign nodules and 5/5 malignant lesions were accurately classified (sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 92.6%, positive predictive value of 71.4%, and negative predictive value of 100%). The false-positive findings were related to the 2 NIFTPs that share similarities with thyroid cancer. Conclusions Our preliminary results suggest to perform a dual-time-point PET/CT acquisition protocol in pHPT patients with uncharacterized centimeter thyroid nodules. However, the real impact of these promising results should be assessed by prospective studies on a larger cohort of patients.

No abstract

No abstract