No abstract

Previous research has indicated that reward-paired cues can enhance disadvantageous risky choice in both humans and rodents. Systemic administration of a serotonin 2C receptor antagonist can attenuate this cue-induced risk preference in rats. However, the neurocognitive mechanisms mediating this effect are currently unknown. We therefore assessed whether the serotonin 2C receptor antagonist RS 102221 is able to attenuate cue-enhanced risk preference via its actions in the lateral orbitofrontal cortex (lOFC) or prelimbic (PrL) area of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). A total of 32 male Long–Evans rats were trained on the cued version of the rat gambling task (rGT), a rodent analog of the human Iowa gambling task, and bilateral guide cannulae were implanted into the lOFC or PrL. Intra-lOFC infusions of the 5-HT 2C antagonist RS 102221 reduced risky choice in animals that showed a preference for the risky options of the rGT at baseline. This effect was not observed in optimal decision-makers, nor those that received infusions targeting the PrL. Given prior data showing that 5-HT 2C antagonists also improve reversal learning through the same neural locus, we hypothesized that reward-concurrent cues may amplify risky decision-making through cognitive inflexibility. We therefore devalued the sugar pellet rewards used in the cued rGT (crGT) through satiation and observed that decision-making patterns did not shift unless animals also received intra-lOFC RS 102221. Collectively, these data suggest that the lOFC is one critical site through which reward-concurrent cues promote risky choice patterns that are insensitive to reinforcer devaluation, and that 5-HT 2C antagonism may optimize choice by facilitating exploration.

Risk/reward decision making is a dynamic process that includes periods of deliberation prior to action selection and evaluation of the action outcomes that bias subsequent choices. Inactivation of the prelimbic (PL) cortex has revealed its integral role in updating decision biases in the face of changes in probabilistic reward contingencies, yet how phasic PL signals during different phases of the decision process influence choice remains unclear. We used temporally-specific optogenetic inhibition to selectively disrupt PL activity coinciding with action selection and outcome phases to examine how these signals influence choice. Male rats expressing the inhibitory opsin eArchT within PL excitatory neurons were well-trained on a probabilistic discounting task, entailing choice between small/certain vs large/risky rewards, the probability of which varied over a session (50-12.5%). During testing, brief light pulses suppressed PL activity prior to choice or after different outcomes. Pre-choice suppression reduced bias towards more preferred/higher utility options and disrupted how recent outcomes influenced subsequent choice. Inhibition during risky “losses” induced a similar profile, but here, the impact of reward omissions were either amplified or diminished, relative to the context of the estimated profitability of the risky option. Inhibition during large or small reward receipt reduced risky choice when this option was more profitable, suggesting these signals can both reinforce rewarded risky choices and also act as a relative value comparator signal that augments incentive for larger rewards. These findings reveal multifaceted contributions by the PL in implementing decisions and integrating action-outcome feedback to assign context to the decision space.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT:The prelimbic (PL) prefrontal cortex plays an integral role in guiding risk/reward decisions, but how activity in this region during different phases of the decision process influences choice is unclear. By using temporally-specific optogenetic manipulations of this activity, the present study unveiled previously uncharacterized and differential contributions by PL in implementing decision policies and how evaluation of decision outcomes shape subsequent choice. These findings provide novel insight into the dynamic processes engaged by the PL that underlie action selection in situations involving reward uncertainty that may aid in understanding the mechanism underlying normal and aberrant decision making processes.

No abstract