One of many protein-protein interactions modulated upon DNA damage is that of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), with the p53 tumor suppressor. Here we report the crystal structure of RPA residues 1-120 (RPA70N) bound to the N-terminal transactivation domain of p53 (residues 37-57; p53N) and, by using NMR spectroscopy, characterize two mechanisms by which the RPA͞p53 interaction can be modulated. RPA70N forms an oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding fold, similar to that previously observed for the ssDNA-binding domains of RPA. In contrast, the N-terminal p53 transactivation domain is largely disordered in solution, but residues 37-57 fold into two amphipathic helices, H1 and H2, upon binding with RPA70N. The H2 helix of p53 structurally mimics the binding of ssDNA to the oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding fold. NMR experiments confirmed that both ssDNA and an acidic peptide mimicking a phosphorylated form of RPA32N can independently compete the acidic p53N out of the binding site. Taken together, our data suggest a mechanism for DNA damage signaling that can explain a threshold response to DNA damage.DNA binding ͉ protein-protein interaction ͉ structural analysis ͉ ssDNA mimicry U pon DNA damage, the p53 tumor suppressor is activated and orchestrates a cellular response by transcriptional regulation of genes involved in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (1, 2). p53 protein is central to an extensive network of DNA damage sensing proteinprotein and protein-nucleic acid interactions. As yet, however, details of how this network is regulated are unclear. One component of the network is replication protein A (RPA), the major single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding protein of the eukaryotic nucleus (3-5). The interaction of p53 with RPA mediates suppression of homologous recombination (6) and modulates Werner syndrome helicase activity (7). It is also linked with DNA repair and disruption of p53 and RPA complexes after DNA damage is thought to coordinate DNA repair with the p53-dependent checkpoint control (8).Because the ability of p53 to bind specific DNA target sequences via its DNA-binding core (9) (Fig. 1,) is blocked when the protein is complexed with RPA it follows that UV-mediated disruption of the complexes is predicted to favor p53 transactivation functions (10). p53-RPA complex formation is affected by the presence of various lengths of ssDNAs, because RPA, when bound to these ssDNAs, is unable to interact with p53 (10). UV radiation of cells also reduces p53-RPA complexes by a second mechanism, because hyperphosphorylated RPA does not associate with p53 (8). Thus p53-RPA interaction is subject (i) to the presence of ssDNA molecules and also (ii) to the phosphorylation status of the RPA protein.RPA is a heterotrimer (RPA70, RPA32, and RPA14; Fig. 1B) involved in many aspects of DNA metabolism such as replication, recombination, and repair (11,12). The largest subunit, RPA70, is a tandem repeat of four oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding (OB) folds (13) comprising RPA70...

USP7/HAUSP is a key regulator of p53 and Mdm2 and is targeted by the Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) protein of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). We have determined the crystal structure of the p53 binding domain of USP7 alone and bound to an EBNA1 peptide. This domain is an eight-stranded beta sandwich similar to the TRAF-C domains of TNF-receptor associated factors, although the mode of peptide binding differs significantly from previously observed TRAF-peptide interactions in the sequence (DPGEGPS) and the conformation of the bound peptide. NMR chemical shift analyses of USP7 bound by EBNA1 and p53 indicated that p53 binds the same pocket as EBNA1 but makes less extensive contacts with USP7. Functional studies indicated that EBNA1 binding to USP7 can protect cells from apoptotic challenge by lowering p53 levels. The data provide a structural and conceptual framework for understanding how EBNA1 might contribute to the survival of Epstein-Barr virus-infected cells.

Four-stranded DNA structures were structurally characterized in vitro by NMR, X-ray and Circular Dichroism spectroscopy in detail. Among the different types of quadruplexes (i-Motifs, minor groove quadruplexes, G-quadruplexes, etc.), the best described are G-quadruplexes which are featured by Hoogsteen base-paring. Sequences with the potential to form quadruplexes are widely present in genome of all organisms. They are found often in repetitive sequences such as telomeric ones, and also in promoter regions and 5' non-coding sequences. Recently, many proteins with binding affinity to G-quadruplexes have been identified. One of the initially portrayed G-rich regions, the human telomeric sequence (TTAGGG)n, is recognized by many proteins which can modulate telomerase activity. Sequences with the potential to form G-quadruplexes are often located in promoter regions of various oncogenes. The NHE III1 region of the c-MYC promoter has been shown to interact with nucleolin protein as well as other G-quadruplex-binding proteins. A number of G-rich sequences are also present in promoter region of estrogen receptor alpha. In addition to DNA quadruplexes, RNA quadruplexes, which are critical in translational regulation, have also been predicted and observed. For example, the RNA quadruplex formation in telomere-repeat-containing RNA is involved in interaction with TRF2 (telomere repeat binding factor 2) and plays key role in telomere regulation. All these fundamental examples suggest the importance of quadruplex structures in cell processes and their understanding may provide better insight into aging and disease development.

No abstract

The influx of genomic sequence information has led to the concept of structural proteomics, the determination of protein structures on a genome-wide scale. Here we describe an approach to structural proteomics of small proteins using NMR spectroscopy. Over 500 small proteins from several organisms were cloned, expressed, purified, and evaluated by NMR. Although there was variability among proteomes, overall 20% of these proteins were found to be readily amenable to NMR structure determination. NMR sample preparation was centralized in one facility, and a distributive approach was used for NMR data collection and analysis. Twelve structures are reported here as part of this approach, which allowed us to infer putative functions for several conserved hypothetical proteins. S tructural proteomics, which aims to determine the threedimensional (3D) structures of all proteins, has become a major initiative within the biomedical community (see ref. 1 and other articles in the same issue). The large number of protein structures expected from these projects will yield valuable clues to the rules for predicting protein folding and understanding biochemical function. In these early stages of the structural proteomics effort, one of the main goals is to identify the best technologies and the most efficient processes to convert gene sequence into 3D structural information. One of the decisions will be to determine the optimal use of x-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy, which are the two techniques that will provide the majority of experimental data for these initiatives.X-ray crystallography currently is perceived as the potential workhorse for structural proteomics, because if provided with a well diffracting crystal it is possible to determine a 3D structure in hours. However, the throughput of structure determination using x-ray crystallography remains unclear, because the ratedetermining step continues to be the production of well diffracting crystals, a process that is unpredictable and can take between hours and months.NMR structure determination is limited currently by size constraints and lengthy data collection and analysis times (often months), and the method is best applied to proteins smaller than 250 amino acids. On the other hand, NMR experiments do not require crystals, and samples appropriate for structure determination can be identified within minutes of the protein being purified. In summary, x-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy seem to have complementary deficiencies, and the relative success of these methods in structural proteomics remains to be determined.We have shown previously that NMR spectroscopy can play a significant role in structural proteomics even with its current limitations (2). The initial pilot project, based on a limited number of proteins from the thermophilic archaebacterium Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum (Mth) suggested that smaller proteins may be more amenable to structure analysis, because in this genome a higher proportion of smaller proteins were soluble compar...

SUMMARY IFI16 is a member of the interferon-inducible HIN-200 family of nuclear proteins. It has been implicated in transcriptional regulation by modulating protein-protein interactions with p53 tumor suppressor protein and other transcription factors. However, the mechanisms of interaction remain unknown. Here, we report the crystal structures of both HIN-A and HIN-B domains of IFI16 determined at 2.0 and 2.35 Å resolution, respectively. Each HIN domain comprises a pair of tightly packed OB-fold subdomains that appear to act as a single unit. We show that both HIN domains of IFI16 are capable of enhancing p53-DNA complex formation and transcriptional activation via distinctive means. HIN-A domain binds to the basic C terminus of p53, whereas the HIN-B domain binds to the core DNA-binding region of p53. Both interactions are compatible with the DNA-bound state of p53 and together contribute to the effect of full-length IFI16 on p53-DNA complex formation and transcriptional activation.

No abstract

No abstract