One of many protein-protein interactions modulated upon DNA damage is that of the single-stranded DNA-binding protein, replication protein A (RPA), with the p53 tumor suppressor. Here we report the crystal structure of RPA residues 1-120 (RPA70N) bound to the N-terminal transactivation domain of p53 (residues 37-57; p53N) and, by using NMR spectroscopy, characterize two mechanisms by which the RPA͞p53 interaction can be modulated. RPA70N forms an oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding fold, similar to that previously observed for the ssDNA-binding domains of RPA. In contrast, the N-terminal p53 transactivation domain is largely disordered in solution, but residues 37-57 fold into two amphipathic helices, H1 and H2, upon binding with RPA70N. The H2 helix of p53 structurally mimics the binding of ssDNA to the oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding fold. NMR experiments confirmed that both ssDNA and an acidic peptide mimicking a phosphorylated form of RPA32N can independently compete the acidic p53N out of the binding site. Taken together, our data suggest a mechanism for DNA damage signaling that can explain a threshold response to DNA damage.DNA binding ͉ protein-protein interaction ͉ structural analysis ͉ ssDNA mimicry U pon DNA damage, the p53 tumor suppressor is activated and orchestrates a cellular response by transcriptional regulation of genes involved in cell cycle arrest and apoptosis (1, 2). p53 protein is central to an extensive network of DNA damage sensing proteinprotein and protein-nucleic acid interactions. As yet, however, details of how this network is regulated are unclear. One component of the network is replication protein A (RPA), the major single-stranded (ss) DNA-binding protein of the eukaryotic nucleus (3-5). The interaction of p53 with RPA mediates suppression of homologous recombination (6) and modulates Werner syndrome helicase activity (7). It is also linked with DNA repair and disruption of p53 and RPA complexes after DNA damage is thought to coordinate DNA repair with the p53-dependent checkpoint control (8).Because the ability of p53 to bind specific DNA target sequences via its DNA-binding core (9) (Fig. 1,) is blocked when the protein is complexed with RPA it follows that UV-mediated disruption of the complexes is predicted to favor p53 transactivation functions (10). p53-RPA complex formation is affected by the presence of various lengths of ssDNAs, because RPA, when bound to these ssDNAs, is unable to interact with p53 (10). UV radiation of cells also reduces p53-RPA complexes by a second mechanism, because hyperphosphorylated RPA does not associate with p53 (8). Thus p53-RPA interaction is subject (i) to the presence of ssDNA molecules and also (ii) to the phosphorylation status of the RPA protein.RPA is a heterotrimer (RPA70, RPA32, and RPA14; Fig. 1B) involved in many aspects of DNA metabolism such as replication, recombination, and repair (11,12). The largest subunit, RPA70, is a tandem repeat of four oligonucleotide͞oligosaccharide-binding (OB) folds (13) comprising RPA70...

USP7/HAUSP is a key regulator of p53 and Mdm2 and is targeted by the Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA1) protein of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). We have determined the crystal structure of the p53 binding domain of USP7 alone and bound to an EBNA1 peptide. This domain is an eight-stranded beta sandwich similar to the TRAF-C domains of TNF-receptor associated factors, although the mode of peptide binding differs significantly from previously observed TRAF-peptide interactions in the sequence (DPGEGPS) and the conformation of the bound peptide. NMR chemical shift analyses of USP7 bound by EBNA1 and p53 indicated that p53 binds the same pocket as EBNA1 but makes less extensive contacts with USP7. Functional studies indicated that EBNA1 binding to USP7 can protect cells from apoptotic challenge by lowering p53 levels. The data provide a structural and conceptual framework for understanding how EBNA1 might contribute to the survival of Epstein-Barr virus-infected cells.

Four-stranded DNA structures were structurally characterized in vitro by NMR, X-ray and Circular Dichroism spectroscopy in detail. Among the different types of quadruplexes (i-Motifs, minor groove quadruplexes, G-quadruplexes, etc.), the best described are G-quadruplexes which are featured by Hoogsteen base-paring. Sequences with the potential to form quadruplexes are widely present in genome of all organisms. They are found often in repetitive sequences such as telomeric ones, and also in promoter regions and 5' non-coding sequences. Recently, many proteins with binding affinity to G-quadruplexes have been identified. One of the initially portrayed G-rich regions, the human telomeric sequence (TTAGGG)n, is recognized by many proteins which can modulate telomerase activity. Sequences with the potential to form G-quadruplexes are often located in promoter regions of various oncogenes. The NHE III1 region of the c-MYC promoter has been shown to interact with nucleolin protein as well as other G-quadruplex-binding proteins. A number of G-rich sequences are also present in promoter region of estrogen receptor alpha. In addition to DNA quadruplexes, RNA quadruplexes, which are critical in translational regulation, have also been predicted and observed. For example, the RNA quadruplex formation in telomere-repeat-containing RNA is involved in interaction with TRF2 (telomere repeat binding factor 2) and plays key role in telomere regulation. All these fundamental examples suggest the importance of quadruplex structures in cell processes and their understanding may provide better insight into aging and disease development.