Epidemiology shows a relationship between solar exposure and all types of skin cancer. Understanding the mechanisms of skin cancer requires knowledge of the photomolecular events that occur within the relevant epidermal cell types in vivo. Studies to date have focused on UVR-induced DNA lesions in keratinocytes, the majority epidermal cell population which gives rise to most skin cancers. Malignant melanoma, arising from melanocytes (5%-10% of epidermal cells), accounts for most skin cancer deaths. We report on new techniques to detect DNA photolesions in human epidermal melanocytes in situ. Previously nonexposed buttock skin of volunteers of skin types I/II was exposed to clinically relevant doses of narrow bandwidth UVB (300 nm) and UVA (320 nm, 340 nm, 360 nm) radiation. Biopsies were taken immediately afterwards and processed for routine histology. Microscope sections were prepared and double-stained with fluorescent-tagged monoclonal antibodies for thymine dimers and melanocytes. UVR dose-response curves for dimer levels within melanocyte nuclei were determined by image analysis and compared with dimer levels in adjacent basal cell keratinocytes. Our data show that UVB and UVA readily induce thymine dimers in melanocytes at levels that are comparable with those found in adjacent keratinocytes. This new technique will enable melanocyte specific studies, such as DNA repair kinetics, to be done in vivo.
Studies concerning flow cytometric assessed DNA content reveal problems in interpretating DNA histograms of tumor specimens. The main problems are histograms with a broad coefficient of variation in the G0/G1 fraction; a high G2M fraction and samples with a low percentage of tumor cells. Therefore, in the present study, 382 fresh tumor specimens of carcinomas were analysed routinely, double labeled with, on the one hand, propidium‐iodide for assessing DNA content and, on the other, a monoclonal keratinantibody for marking epithelial and tumor cells. Of the 311 tumor samples, using single parameter analysis 165 (54%) were classified as DNA aneuploid arid 146 (46%) as DNA “euploid.” By double parameter analysis, 224 (72%) samples were keratin positive and 87 (27%) keratin negative and, of the 224 keratin positive tumors, 175 (78%) were DNA aneuploid and 49 (220) DNA euploid. The DNA histograms of single and double parameter analysis were compared and it was concluded that in 24 cases (11%) keratin labeling was necessary to recognize DNA aneuploidy. In another 23 (10%) cases, keratin labeling was helpful in assessing DNA aneuploidy. Finally when the results of the 311 samples were combined, 215 (68%) were scored as DNA aneuploid and 99 (32%) DNA euploid. Thus the overall gain in assessing DNA aneuploidy using the double labeling technique is 14%. In conclusion, it is shown that keratin labeling on fresh tumor cell suspensions of epithelial tumors is of additional value in establishing DNA content. Because single parameter DNA assessment is adequate in approximately 60% of the tested samples, the double labeling technique can be performed routinely, or after initial single parameter DNA assessment. Histograms having a broad CV and/or a high G2M are good candidates for the double labeling technique. Using this technique, DNA‐content assessment becomes more reliable.
The purpose of this study was to improve the detection of FISH signals, in order that spot counting by a fully automated image cytometer be comparable to that obtained visually under the microscope. Two systems of spot scoring, visual and automated counting, were investigated in parallel on stimulated human lymphocytes with FISH using a biotinylated centromeric probe for chromosome 3. Signal characteristics were first analyzed on images recorded with a coupled charge device (CCD) camera. Number of spots per nucleus were scored visually on these recorded images versus automatically with a DISCOVERY image analyzer. Several fluochromes, amplification systems and pretreatments were tested. Our results for both visual and automated scoring show that the tyramide amplification system (TSA) gives the best amplification of signal if pepsin treatment is applied prior to FISH. Accuracy of the automated scoring, however, remained low (58% of nuclei containing two spots) compared to the visual scoring because of the high intranuclear variation between FISH spots.
DNA quantitation using fluorescent dyes is of interest in image cytometry in that it is nondestructive in its mode of staining and is compatible with techniques such as FISH and immunofluorescence, allowing multicolor analysis of a wide range of cellular markers of interest. Optimal preparation techniques were sought using human peripheral blood lymphocytes and fine needle samples of breast carcinomas. Unfixed (air-dried only), ethanol, ethanol/acetic acid, and paraformaldehyde/ethanol fixations were tested. Unfixed or fixed cells were placed on slides as a drop or by cytocentrifugation, stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride and DNA content was measured using image analysis. Histogram quality was evaluated using G0G1 peak coefficient of variation, and compared to those generated by flow cytometry. Drop preparations of ethanol/acetic acid fixed and cytospin preparations of paraformaldehyde/ethanol fixed cells appeared to give the best histograms for image analysis, which were inferior in quality to those generated by flow cytometry. Comparison of breast carcinoma histograms generated by flow and image showed the same DNA aneuploid populations but with slightly higher DNA indices measured by image analysis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.