Objectives-To benchmark current practice in the management of adult patients presenting with seizures to the accident and emergency (A&E) departments by performing a comparative interdepartmental audit. To assess the quality and degree of completeness of documentation in A&E records and to develop a proforma for the documentation of any case presenting with a seizure which would incorporate management guidelines for use by A&E doctors. Methods-This was a retrospective, criterion based audit carried out in 12 A&E departments in the South Thames region. It involved 1200 adult patients who presented to A&E departments after a seizure. The degree of completeness of A&E records was assessed using criteria identified by A&E consultants and neurologists. Guidelines for use in the management of patients with seizures have been produced. Results-Important aspects of the history and examination were frequently unrecorded in patients' notes. The recording of vital signs was particularly poor. A diversity of practice was shown between the departments that were audited and the number of investigations performed in each department varied considerably. Hospital admissions for patients with first seizures varied widely between departments, ranging from between 34.6% to 91.7% of cases. Documentation of advice given to patients about driving was evident in just 0.9% of cases. Conclusions-Wide interdepartmental variation exists in both the quality of information recorded in A&E records and in the management of patients. Deficiencies could be minimised and potential improvements in the quality of documentation might be achieved by the introduction of a structured proforma incorporating predefined management guidelines. (7Accid Emerg Med 1998;15:237-243)
Objectives-The aim of this study was to assess the characteristics and audit the management of patients for whom a diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage was made and who were admitted to a neurosurgical centre from an accident and emergency (A&E) departent. The objective was to use the results to make recommendations for improving care in this group of patients. Methods-Four neurosurgical centres in the South Thames Region provided lists of patients admitted with a diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage during 1997. The medical records and computed tomography of 162 patient episodes from 20 A&E departments were reviewed. The speed of presentation, the provisional diagnosis and the referral patterns were examined. Patient records were audited to investigate what proportion were treated according to established guidelines while in the A&E departments. Results-63.7% of patients presented to A&E within six hours of ictus and 81.1% within three days. Some 49.2% of patients were seen by a doctor within 30 minutes and 74.7% within one hour. Computed tomography was performed on 18.8% within two hours and only 66.3% within six hours of arrival at the A&E department. Eighteen per cent were treated with nimodipine, 26% with intravenous fluids and 32% were given analgesia before leaving the department. Delays occurred in obtaining computed tomography. Conclusions-The management of patients who present to A&E departments with subarachnoid haemorrhage is suboptimal. Improved awareness of the disorder, management by senior A&E staV and clear care pathways could help with management. (J Accid Emerg Med 2000;17:176-179)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.