No abstract

No abstract

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to study the relationships of the 3 different types of endoscopic calcifications of the renal papilla (Randall’s plaque, intratubular calcification, papillary crater) with the type of stone and urine chemistry.METHODS This prospective study examined 41 patients (age range: 18 to 80 years) who received retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal lithiasis (mean stone size: 15.3 ± 7.2 mm). Endoscopic injuries of the renal papilla were classified as Randall’s plaque, intratubular calcification, or papillary crater. Calculi were classified as uric acid, calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM; papillary and cavity), calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD), or calcium phosphate (CP). A 24 h urine analysis of calcium, oxalate, citrate, phosphate, and pH was performed in all patients. The relationship of each type of papillary endoscopic injury with type of stone and urine chemistry was determined. Fisher’s exact test and Student’s t-test were used to determine the significance of relationships, and a p value below 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS The most common endoscopic injury was tubular calcification (78%), followed by Randall’s plaque (58%), and papillary crater (39%). There was no significant relationship of Randall’s plaque with type of stone. However, endoscopic intratubular calcification (p = 0.025) and papillary crater (p = 0.041) were more common in patients with COD and CP stones. There were also significant relationships of papillary crater with hypercalciuria (p = 0.036) and hyperoxaluria (p = 0.024), and of Randall’s plaque with hypocitraturia (p = 0.005).CONCLUSIONS There are certain specific relationships between the different types of endoscopic papillary calcifications with stone chemistry and urine chemistry. COD and CP stones were associated with endoscopic tubular calcifications and papillary craters. Hypercalciuria was associated with tubular calcification, and hypocitraturia was associated with Randall’s plaque.

No abstract

Background: RENAL and PADUA scoring systems have been designed and validated as a method to assess the complexity of renal masses and predict the risk of perioperative complications. We aimed to evaluate if there is an association between RENAL and PADUA nephrometry scores with the Trifecta and Pentafecta achievement. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analysed the data from 102 patients with renal cell carcinoma who underwent partial nephrectomy from January 2011 to October 2018 at our institution. Radiological characteristics of the renal masses were scored according to the RENAL and PADUA classification. Trifecta and Pentafecta achievement were collected. We performed a descriptive analysis and used de χ2 test to evaluate the relationship between PADUA and RENAL scores and Trifecta and Pentafecta achievement. Result: Among 102 patients, the median tumor size was 2.7 cm (IQR 0.8-7.5), the median RENAL score was 7 (IQR 4-11) and PADUA score 8 (IQR 6-14). The overall rate of postoperative complications was 21.6% (n=22). The rates of Trifecta and Pentafecta achievement were 50% (n=51/102) and 46.1% (n=47/102), respectively. Trifecta and Pentafecta achievement were higher when the PADUA score was ≤10 (OR 3.62; IC95% (1.08-12.11); p=0.0317) and (OR 4.98; IC95% (1.32-18.7); p=0.0175), respectively. Likewise, Trifecta and Pentafecta achievement were higher in patients with RENAL score ≤ 8 (OR 4.09; IC95% (1.46-11.42); p=0.0072) and (OR 4.92; IC95% (1.66-14.51); p=0.0039), respectively. Conclusion: There is an association between the RENAL and PADUA nephrometry scores and the Trifecta and Pentafecta achievement.