Highlights d SARS-CoV-2 infection in induced lung cells is characterized by phosphoproteomics d Analysis of response reveals host cell signaling and protein expression profile d Comparison to studies in undifferentiated cell lines shows unique pathology in iAT2s d Systems-level predictions find druggable pathways that can impede viral life cycle
SARS-CoV-2 related proteins were targeted in ultra-large in silico screens. Multiple functional sites on individual target proteins were screened. 17 virus-related targets, 45 screens, and 50 billion docking instances were covered. Conservation in some target sites means hits could exhibit pancoronavirus function. Screening results are available as an interactive web resource and for download.
SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for the ongoing world-wide pandemic which has already taken more than two million lives. Effective treatments are urgently needed. The enzymatic activity of the HECT-E3 ligase family members has been implicated in the cell egression phase of deadly RNA viruses such as Ebola through direct interaction of its VP40 Protein. Here we report that HECT-E3 ligase family members such as NEDD4 and WWP1 interact with and ubiquitylate the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. Furthermore, we find that HECT family members are overexpressed in primary samples derived from COVID-19 infected patients and COVID-19 mouse models. Importantly, rare germline activating variants in the NEDD4 and WWP1 genes are associated with severe COVID-19 cases. Critically, I3C, a natural NEDD4 and WWP1 inhibitor from Brassicaceae, displays potent antiviral effects and inhibits viral egression. In conclusion, we identify the HECT family members of E3 ligases as likely novel biomarkers for COVID-19, as well as new potential targets of therapeutic strategy easily testable in clinical trials in view of the established well-tolerated nature of the Brassicaceae natural compounds.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) remains a major public health concern, and vaccine unavailability, hesitancy, or failure underscore the need for discovery of efficacious antiviral drug therapies. Numerous approved drugs target protein kinases associated with viral life cycle and symptoms of infection. Repurposing of kinase inhibitors is appealing as they have been vetted for safety and are more accessible for COVID‐19 treatment. However, an understanding of drug mechanism is needed to improve our understanding of the factors involved in pathogenesis. We tested the in vitro activity of three kinase inhibitors against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2), including inhibitors of AXL kinase, a host cell factor that contributes to successful SARS‐CoV‐2 infection. Using multiple cell‐based assays and approaches, gilteritinib, nintedanib, and imatinib were thoroughly evaluated for activity against SARS‐CoV‐2 variants. Each drug exhibited antiviral activity, but with stark differences in potency, suggesting differences in host dependency for kinase targets. Importantly, for gilteritinib, the amount of compound needed to achieve 90% infection inhibition, at least in part involving blockade of spike protein‐mediated viral entry and at concentrations not inducing phospholipidosis (PLD), approached a clinically achievable concentration. Knockout of AXL, a target of gilteritinib and nintedanib, impaired SARS‐CoV‐2 variant infectivity, supporting a role for AXL in SARS‐CoV‐2 infection and supporting further investigation of drug‐mediated AXL inhibition as a COVID‐19 treatment. This study supports further evaluation of AXL‐targeting kinase inhibitors as potential antiviral agents and treatments for COVID‐19. Additional mechanistic studies are needed to determine underlying differences in virus response.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.