2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of potent inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 infection by combined pharmacological evaluation and cellular network prioritization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We evaluated in this assay the antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 replication of a selection of SARS-CoV-2 reference inhibitors. The results obtained were concordant to reports from other publications ( Agostini et al, 2019 )– ( Vangeel et al, 2022 ), ( Chang et al, 2022 ), ( Patten et al, 2022 ), ( Softic et al, 2020 ). An additional benefit of our assay is that it allows simultaneous read-out of both the antiviral potential and cytotoxicity caused by the compound.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We evaluated in this assay the antiviral activity against SARS-CoV-2 replication of a selection of SARS-CoV-2 reference inhibitors. The results obtained were concordant to reports from other publications ( Agostini et al, 2019 )– ( Vangeel et al, 2022 ), ( Chang et al, 2022 ), ( Patten et al, 2022 ), ( Softic et al, 2020 ). An additional benefit of our assay is that it allows simultaneous read-out of both the antiviral potential and cytotoxicity caused by the compound.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Docking simulations offer a reliable but computationally intensive method to predict (or validate) binding between proteins and ligands 34 . Motivated by the need to model rapid response to sudden health crises, we chose as our validation set the 26 SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins and the 332 human proteins targeted by the SARS-CoV-2 viral proteins 35 37 . These proteins are missing from the training data of AI-Bind, hence represent novel targets and allow us to rely on recent efforts to understand the biology of COVID-19 to validate the AI-Bind predictions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the comorbitity of COVID‐19 and PAH, we next aimed to identify which repositioned drugs for COVID‐19 could be particulary useful for COVID‐19 patients with PAH as a comorbidity. A previous study evaluated 6710 clinical and preclinical drugs by immunocytofluorescence‐based screening to identify SARS‐CoV‐2 infection inhibitors 53 and characterized those with strong effects, weak effects, very weak effects, and no effects on COVID‐19. We collected 631 drugs that have been experimentally demonstrated to have strong, weak, or very weak effects on COVID‐19 from this study and another set of 77 drugs that have experimental strong or weak effects on COVID‐19, 34 and examined which of them could be potentially repurposed for patients with COVID‐19 who also had PAH.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%