PurposeInsufficient sensitivity and specificity prevent the use of most existing biomarkers for early detection of breast cancer. Recently, it was reported that serum microRNAs (miRNAs) may be potential biomarkers in many cancer diseases. In this study, we investigated whether serum levels of 5 miRNAs including miR-21, miR-125b, miR-145, miR-155, and miR-365 could discriminate breast cancer patients and healthy controls.MethodsSerum levels of miRNAs were measured by using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction in 99 breast cancer patients and 21 healthy controls. The abundance change of serum miRNAs were also evaluated following surgical resection in 20 breast cancer patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the sensitivity and specificity of miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers.ResultsSerum levels of miR-21 and miR-155 was significantly higher, while miR-365 was significantly lower in breast cancer as compared with healthy controls. The serum levels of miR-21 and miR-155 significantly decreased following surgical resection. Additionally, the serum level of miR-155 at stages I and II was significantly higher compared to stage III. The serum miR-145 level was remarkably higher in progesterone receptor (PR)-positive patients than PR-negative. The positivity of miR-21, miR-155, and miR-365 was high compared to CA 153 and CEA in breast cancer. ROC curve analyses of a combination of miR-21, miR-155, and miR-365 yielded much higher area under curve and enhanced sensitivity and specificity in comparison to each miRNA alone.ConclusionThe combination of serum miR-21/miR-155/miR-365 may potentially serve as a sensitive and specific biomarker that enables differentiation of breast cancer from healthy controls.

No abstract

Purpose We aimed to identify whether hormonal receptors change throughout tumor progression, because this may influence management and influence prognosis in breast cancer patients. Patients and Methods From the institution's database, we collected data of 963 patients who developed relapse during their follow-ups. To determine estrogen receptor(ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), we retrospectively reviewed immunohistochemical(IHC) results in both primary and relapsed tumors. Results Among a total of 963 patients, 280 and 683 patients experienced locoregional relapse only and distant metastasis irrespective of locoreginal relapse, respectively. ER in 650 patients and PR in 590 patients from both primary tumor and relapse were identified, revealing a change in 157 (24.2%) and 154 (26.1%) patients, respectively. In patients with distant metastasis, assessment of ER and PR showed an alteration in 86 and 56 patients, respectively. The overall survival related to the change of ER and PR status in primary tumor and relapse was significantly different (log rank, P<0.001 in both ER and PR status). In addition, women with hormone receptors negative primary tumors that changed to hormone receptors positive tumors who received anti-hormonal therapy after relapse showed a statistically significant good overall survival (p<0.001) compared with women who had constant ER-negative tumors.(cox regression, hazard ratio 2.32 ; 95% CI, 1.91 to 3.01) Conclusion The breast cancer showed alterations of hormone receptor status throughout tumor progression, hat were related to the strategy of treatment and significantly influences survival. Therefore, investigations of hormone receptor at relapse are essential and helpful in breast cancer patient management. Citation Format: Lee E-S, Kim J, Yoo T-K, Kim Y, Han J, Kang YJ, Choi J, Rhu J, Lee H-B, Han W, Noh D-Y, Moon H-G. An alteration of hormonal receptor status throughout tumor progression related to prognosis in breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-07-19.