Objective. Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydophila (Chlamydia) pneumoniae are known triggers of reactive arthritis (ReA) and exist in a persistent metabolically active infection state in the synovium, suggesting that they may be susceptible to antimicrobial agents. The goal of this study was to investigate whether a 6-month course of combination antibiotics is an effective treatment for patients with chronic Chlamydiainduced ReA.Methods. This study was a 9-month, prospective, double-blind, triple-placebo trial assessing a 6-month course of combination antibiotics as a treatment for Chlamydia-induced ReA. Eligible patients had to be positive for C trachomatis or C pneumoniae by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Groups received 1) doxycycline and rifampin plus placebo instead of azithromycin; 2) azithromycin and rifampin plus placebo instead of doxycycline; or 3) placebos instead of azithromycin, doxycycline, and rifampin. The primary end point was the number of patients who improved by 20% or more in at least 4 of 6 variables without worsening in any 1 variable in both combination antibiotic groups combined and in the placebo group at month 6 compared with baseline.Results. The primary end point was achieved in 17 of 27 patients (63%) receiving combination antibiotics and in 3 of 15 patients (20%) receiving placebo. Secondary efficacy end points showed similar results. Six of 27 patients (22%) randomized to combination antibiotics believed that their disease went into complete remission during the trial, whereas no patient in the placebo arm achieved remission. Significantly more patients in the active treatment group became negative for C trachomatis or C pneumoniae by PCR at month 6. Adverse events were mild, with no significant differences between the groups.Conclusion. These data suggest that a 6-month course of combination antibiotics is an effective treatment for chronic Chlamydia-induced ReA.

Although the patients on the low-carbohydrate diet did lose significantly more weight than the controls did, the diet did not increase bone turnover markers compared with controls at any time point. Further, there was no significant change in the bone turnover ratio compared with controls.

The administration of 100 mg of methylprednisolone intravenously (IV) 1/2 h prior to rituximab decreases the incidence of acute infusion reactions (AIRs). However, this pretreatment adds considerable time and conveys potential risk. We performed an open-label prospective assessment of oral prednisone as a pretreatment to rituximab. This was a 26-week open-label trial of 40 mg of oral prednisone given 1/2 h prior to rituximab as a prophylaxis against AIRs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The primary endpoint was AIRs in the first 24 h after their initial infusion. Secondary endpoints include AIRs during the 24 h following their second infusion and any adverse events experienced during the 26-week study; efficacy measures were also followed as secondary endpoints. Sixty-four subjects were screened, and 50 subjects qualified. Fourteen out of the 50 (28 %) subjects had AIRs within 24 h of their first infusion. There were four AIRs (8.3 %) within 24 h of their second infusion. One of day 0 AIRs required drug discontinuation (wheezing/bronchospasm). Forty out of 50 (80 %) subjects experienced an adverse event during the 26 weeks. There were three SAEs deemed not to be study-drug related. The DAS28 and HAQ-DI all improved significantly at weeks 8, 16, and 26 compared to baseline. Historical controls demonstrate that 27 % of RA subjects experience AIRs with their first rituximab infusion. Our data suggest a smaller dose of oral prednisone is an effective alternative to IV methylprednisolone as a pretreatment for rituximab in patients with RA.