No abstract

Propofol (mean dose 2.85 mg kg-1 h-1) was administered for 4 days by continuous i.v. infusion for sedation in 14 agitated and restless ICU patients. This provided rapid control of the level of sedation. When the infusion was discontinued, adequate recovery with response to commands was obtained in most patients by 10 min. Recovery times and the decrease in blood propofol concentration were similar after 24, 48, 72 and 96 h of infusion. Cumulative effects, tachyphylaxis, or other untoward effects were not observed.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

In order to prevent the occurrence of major hypothermia during liver transplantation, with its deleterious effects on intraoperative cardiovascular activity and on postoperative graft functioning, this study evaluated the benefit of an oesophageal rewarmer, used during surgery, in addition to the usual methods of warming (OR temperature at 22 degrees C, rewarming of fluids and blood, heating mattress, heat and moisture exchanger). We compared 10 patients with an oesophageal rewarmer (OeR group) to 10 patients without (Control group). The anaesthetic procedure was similar in all cases. Rectal (RT) and pulmonary artery (PT) temperatures were recorded during the three phases of surgery (pre-anhepatic, anhepatic, postanhepatic phase) and their time course was analysed with non-parametric tests. The two groups were comparable with regard to duration of surgery, blood and fluid requirements and veno-venous bypass flow rate. The RT decreased similarly in both groups, but was significantly higher in the OeR group at peritoneum closure (P < 0.01). The PT was higher in the OeR group after onset of venous shunting (P < 0.05) and during the third phase of surgery (P < 0.01). Three incidents (one leakage and two herniations of the latex tube) occurred, without detrimental effects on the patients. It is concluded that the oesophageal heat exchanger allows better rewarming after revascularization of the graft, but is unable to prevent cardiac hypothermia at unclamping.

The aim of this study was to compare recovery assessed with the Newman, deletion af a's and postbox tests after total intravenous anaesthsia for procedures lasting more than 90 min, with either propofol (PPF) or midazolam (MDZ), reversed or not by flumazenil (FMZ). Thirty patients scheduled for peripheral surgery were randomly allocated to 3 groups of 10, receiving by continuous infusion until the end of surgery either PPF (n = 10) or MDZ (n = 20) combined with alfentanil. FMZ was administered thereafter to 10 patients receiving MDZ until they opened their eyes on command or to a maximum dose of 1 mg. Recovery tests were performed 45, 90 and 180 min after the end of anaesthesia. Results were analysed with non-parametric tests. Recovery scores were significantly better in the PPF group at all times, reaching control values at 180 min for the three first tests. FMZ reversal did not improve the scores compared to those resulting from MDZ alone. This study provides further data in favour of PPF as far as rapid and complete recovery is concerned. The efficiency of FMZ is incomplete and only transient when administered in a single dose.