1986
DOI: 10.1016/s0750-7658(86)80158-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Arrêt cardiaque pendant l'anesthésie et la période de réveil. Données de l'enquête INSERM 1978–1982

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16 2014Tertiary University Hospital Database - Brazi1 1996–201020030.716Cardiac arrest in OR and PACU1: 20.2, 2: 73.01: 100, 2: 618,367≥60 yearsOlsson & Hallén 5 1988Single Hospital Database – Sweden 1976–198419800.987Cardiac arrest in OR2: 40.82: 4360,563 > 60 yearsOtteni et al . 44 1986Multicentic - 460 Hospitals Prospective survey – France 1978–198219800.974Cardiac arrest within 24 hours1: 25.3, 2: 37.81: 252, 2: 5039,620≥60 years*Tamdee et al . 17 2009Single University Hospital Database – Thailand 2003–200720050.780Cardiac arrest within 24 hours1: 19.91: 368,905Cardiac surgery≥65 years

Abbreviations .

…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 2014Tertiary University Hospital Database - Brazi1 1996–201020030.716Cardiac arrest in OR and PACU1: 20.2, 2: 73.01: 100, 2: 618,367≥60 yearsOlsson & Hallén 5 1988Single Hospital Database – Sweden 1976–198419800.987Cardiac arrest in OR2: 40.82: 4360,563 > 60 yearsOtteni et al . 44 1986Multicentic - 460 Hospitals Prospective survey – France 1978–198219800.974Cardiac arrest within 24 hours1: 25.3, 2: 37.81: 252, 2: 5039,620≥60 years*Tamdee et al . 17 2009Single University Hospital Database – Thailand 2003–200720050.780Cardiac arrest within 24 hours1: 19.91: 368,905Cardiac surgery≥65 years

Abbreviations .

…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…improved technology and clinical practices. 8,9 Study periods vary from 5 to 18 yr, 4,[10][11][12] and thus the impact of changing technology and clinical practices may result in variation in the incidence of ICA across individual studies. Another reason is that most studies are based on data from single institutions and consequently suffer from limited external validity.…”
Section: Perioperative Medicinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anesthesia machine failure was listed among the top causes of ICA in Brazil and was not cited as an expressive cause of ICA by other articles during this decade. 24 Since the study done by Ruiz-Neto et al does not provide further details on the type of machine failure nor it specifies the anesthesia machine used, we can speculate that the incorporation of capnographs or alarms could have reduced the incidence of ICA as expected by Keenan and Boyan, but since machine failure is a vast term, we cannot affirm this statement. 13 Also, the descriptive study of Ruiz Neto et al was performed in a tertiary teaching hospital, in which patients have more comorbidities, with a great number of urgent and emergency surgeries, in patients ASA P IV and V, which could have an important role in increasing the ICA during this period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In the 1980s, other studies around the world showed that ICA ranged from 1 to 23 arrests/10,000 anesthesias while, in Brazil, in the years 1982---1984, the incidence of ICA was higher than the worldwide incidence, with 39:10,000 anesthesias. 7,9,10,13,23,24 This worldwide incidence was found in studies performed in developed countries, which included France, United States of America, Sweden and Netherlands. The French study, which presented with the highest ICA incidence among the developed countries, reported that the main anesthesia-related cause had an important relationship with medication use, which was in agreement with the main cause found in Brazil, which was anesthetic overdose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%