OBJECTIVE To investigate the prevalence and incidence of clinical fractures in obese, postmenopausal women enrolled in the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). METHODS This was a multinational, prospective, observational, population-based study carried out by 723 physician practices at 17 sites in 10 countries. A total of 60,393 women aged ≥55 years were included. Data were collected using self-administered questionnaires that covered domains that included patient characteristics, fracture history, risk factors for fracture, and anti-osteoporosis medications. RESULTS Body mass index (BMI) and fracture history were available at baseline, 1 and 2 years in 44,534 women, 23.4% of whom were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2). Fracture prevalence in obese women at baseline was 222 per 1,000 and incidence at 2 years was 61.7 per 1,000, similar to rates in non-obese women (227 and 66.0 per 1,000, respectively). Fractures in obese women accounted for 23% and 22% of all previous and incident fractures, respectively. The risk of incident ankle and upper leg fractures was significantly higher in obese than in non-obese women whilst the risk of wrist fracture was significantly lower. Obese women with fracture were more likely to have experienced early menopause and to report two or more falls in the past year. Self-reported asthma, emphysema, and type 1 diabetes were all significantly more common in obese than non-obese women with incident fracture. At 2 years, 27% of obese women with incident fracture were receiving bone-protective therapy, compared with 41% of non-obese and 57% of underweight women. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate that obesity is not protective against fracture in postmenopausal women and is associated with increased risk of ankle and upper leg fractures. These findings have major public health implications in view of the rapidly rising incidence of obesity. Further studies are required to establish the pathogenesis of fractures in the obese population and to develop effective preventive strategies.
Vitamin D deficiency is common in the elderly and may lead to secondary hyperparathyroidism, cortical bone loss, and hip fractures. The effect of vitamin D supplementation for 1 yr was studied in 72 people living in a nursing home and 70 people living in an aged people's home. The subjects were randomized into 3 groups: control, and 400 or 800 IU vitamin D3/day. The initial vitamin D status of each subject was classified as deficient or borderline [serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) less than 30 nmol/L] in 79% and adequate (serum 25OHD greater than or equal to 30 nmol/L) in 21%. Serum 25OHD concentrations increased about 3-fold in both groups receiving vitamin D supplementation. Serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25-(OH)2D] concentrations increased slightly but significantly, and the increase was inversely related to the initial serum 25OHD concentration. Serum intact PTH-(1-84) concentrations decreased about 15% during supplementation in both nursing home and aged people's home residents, whereas serum osteocalcin significantly decreased in the nursing home residents only. We conclude that a vitamin D3 supplement of 400 IU/day adequately improves vitamin D status in elderly people and increases 1,25-(OH)2D concentrations in those with vitamin D deficiency. Supplementation decreases parathyroid function and may depress bone turnover to some degree.
Low body mass index (BMI) is a well-established risk factor for fracture in postmenopausal women. Height and obesity have also been associated with increased fracture risk at some sites. We investigated the relationships of weight, BMI, and height with incident clinical fracture in a practice-based cohort of postmenopausal women participating in the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). Data were collected at baseline and 1, 2, and 3 years. For hip, spine, wrist, pelvis, rib, upper arm/shoulder, clavicle, ankle, lower leg, and upper leg fractures, we modeled the time to incident self-reported fracture over a 3-year period using the Cox proportional hazards model and fitted the best linear or non-linear models containing height, weight, and BMI. Of 52,939 women, 3628 (6.9%) reported an incident clinical fracture during the 3-year follow-up period. Linear BMI showed a significant inverse association with hip, clinical spine, and wrist fractures: adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) (95% confidence intervals [CIs]) per increase of 5 kg/m2 were 0.80 (0.71–0.90), 0.83 (0.76–0.92), and 0.88 (0.83–0.94), respectively (all p < 0.001). For ankle fractures, linear weight showed a significant positive association: adjusted HR per 5-kg increase 1.05 (1.02–1.07) (p < 0.001). For upper arm/shoulder and clavicle fractures, only linear height was significantly associated: adjusted HRs per 10-cm increase were 0.85 (0.75–0.97) (p = 0.02) and 0.73 (0.57–0.92) (p = 0.009), respectively. For pelvic and rib fractures, the best models were for non-linear BMI or weight (p = 0.05 and 0.03, respectively), with inverse associations at low BMI/body weight and positive associations at high values. These data demonstrate that the relationships between fracture and weight, BMI, and height are site-specific. The different associations may be mediated, at least in part, by effects on bone mineral density, bone structure and geometry, and patterns of falling.
It has been suggested that periodontitis and systemic bone mass might be related. In order to evaluate this possible relationship, we performed an intra-oral examination and measured lumbar bone mineral density (lumbar BMD) and metacarpal cortical thickness (MCT) in 286 female volunteers between 46 and 55 years of age. In addition, the alveolar bone height was measured on bite wing radiographs of the dentate subjects. Of the subject, n = 60 (21%) were edentulous. Compared to the dentate subjects, the lumbar BMD and MCT of the edentulous women were not significantly different. In the dentate subjects, no significant correlation was observed between the clinical parameters of periodontitis (mean probing depth, occurrence of bleeding after probing and number of missing teeth) and the bone mass parameters (lumbar BMD and MCT); nor was a significant relation observed between the bone mass measurements and alveolar bone height. We therefore suggest that systemic bone mass is not an important factor in the pathogenesis of periodontitis.
Our data suggest that bone metabolism markers are good predictors of bone mass in boys and of bone mass increase in both sexes. In early puberty, sex steroids stimulate the pubertal growth spurt in conjunction with GH and IGF-1. The fast increase in height gives rise to an increase in bone turnover and bone mineral apposition. It is known that at the end of puberty high levels of oestradiol inhibit chondrocyte proliferation. This leads to a decline in height velocity and bone turnover. Bone mass still increases under the influence of sex steroids and IGF-1. The data in our study confirm previous reports that markers of bone turnover relate positively to height velocity.
The factors that influence vitamin D status were investigated in 125 patients with hip fracture and in 74 elderly control subjects. The serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] varied with sunshine score and were paralleled by serum 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D]. The control subjects showed a higher sunshine score and higher serum 24(OH)D levels than the patients with hip fracture. Dietary vitamin D intake was similar in both groups (mean 115 IU/d). A positive correlation between vitamin D intake and serum 25(OH)D was observed in the patients with low sunshine exposure. It appeared from this relation that dietary vitamin D intake should be approximately 300 IU/d to maintain an adequate serum (25(OH)D concentration. Vitamin D status was very poor in patients who were institutionalized before hip fracture. Multiple regression analysis on serum 25(OH)D confirmed the primary role of sunshine exposure as determinant of vitamin D status. The principal determinants of serum 1,25(OH)2D were serum 25(OH)D, serum creatinine, and serum phosphate.
SummaryThe Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) is a prospective cohort study involving 723 physicians and 60,393 women subjects ≥55 years. The data will provide insights into the management of fracture risk in older women over 5 years, patient experience with prevention and treatment, and distribution of risk among older women on an international basis.IntroductionData from cohort studies describing the distribution of osteoporosis-related fractures and risk factors are not directly comparable and do not compare regional differences in patterns of patient management and fracture outcomes.MethodsThe GLOW is a prospective, multinational, observational cohort study. Practices typical of each region were identified through primary care networks organized for administrative, research, or educational purposes. Noninstitutionalized patients visiting each practice within the previous 2 years were eligible. Self-administered questionnaires were mailed, with 2:1 oversampling of women ≥65 years. Follow-up questionnaires will be sent at 12-month intervals for 5 years.ResultsA total of 723 physicians at 17 sites in ten countries agreed to participate. Baseline surveys were mailed (October 2006 to February 2008) to 140,416 subjects. After the exclusion of 3,265 women who were ineligible or had died, 60,393 agreed to participate.ConclusionsGLOW will provide contemporary information on patterns of management of fracture risk in older women over a 5-year period. The collection of data in a similar manner in ten countries will permit comparisons of patient experience with prevention and treatment and provide insights into the distribution of risk among older women on an international basis.
F ractures are a major clinical concern in older women and men. The most commonly considered sites of fracture are the hip, spine, and wrist.1-4 About 40% of white women aged 50 years and older will experience at least 1 clinically recognized fracture at one of these skeletal sites and be subjected to increased risks of morbidity and mortality. 5,6 However, other less recognized fractures, such as those of the pelvis, ribs, shoulder, distal femur, and proximal tibia, may also lead to reductions in quality of life. 7-10OBJECTIVE: To examine several dimensions of health-related quality of life (HRQL) in postmenopausal women who report previous fractures, and to provide perspective by comparing these findings with those in other chronic conditions (diabetes, arthritis, lung disease). PATIENTS AND METHODS:Fractures are a major cause of morbidity among older women. Few studies have examined HRQL in women who have had prior fractures and the effect of prior fracture location on HRQL. In this observational study of 57,141 postmenopausal women aged 55 years and older (enrollment from December 2007 to March 2009) from 17 study sites in 10 countries, HRQL was measured using the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions Index (EQ-5D) and the health status, physical function, and vitality questions of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS:Reductions in EQ-5D health-utility scores and SF-36-measured health status, physical function, and vitality were seen in association with 9 of 10 fracture locations. Spine, hip, and upper leg fractures resulted in the greatest reductions in quality of life (EQ-5D scores, 0.62, 0.64, and 0.61, respectively, vs 0.79 without prior fracture). Women with fractures at any of these 3 locations, as well as women with a history of multiple fractures (EQ-5D scores, 0.74 for 1 prior fracture, 0.68 for 2, and 0.58 for ≥3), had reductions in HRQL that were similar to or worse than those in women with other chronic diseases (0.67 for diabetes, 0.69 for arthritis, and 0.71 for lung disease).CONCLUSION: Previous fractures at a variety of bone locations, particularly spine, hip, and upper leg, or involving more than 1 location are associated with significant reductions in quality of life. If their full health impact is to be appreciated, fractures at a range of sites need to be examined to determine their effects on health-related quality of life (HRQL). Mayo Clin
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.