About 30% of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and 20% to 40% of children and adults with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) never achieve remission, even with intensive chemotherapy. Most die of resistant leukemia, often within 6 months or less. In this study of 126 patients with resistant ALL or AML, allogeneic bone marrow transplants from HLA-identical siblings produced remissions in 113 of 115 (98%) evaluable patients. The 3-year probability of leukemia-free survival was 21% (95% confidence interval, 15% to 29%). Leukemia-free survival was similar in ALL (23%, 12% to 40%) and AML (21%, 14% to 31%). Only 3 of 27 patients at risk relapsed more than 2 years posttransplant.
Optimal prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is controversial. We compared efficacy of three posttransplant immune suppressive regimens in 2,286 recipients of HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplants for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first remission, acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in first remission, or chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in first chronic phase. Six hundred forty received methotrexate, 977 received cyclosporine, and 669 received combined cyclosporine and methotrexate. In children, the three regimens resulted in similar outcomes. In adults, cyclosporine and methotrexate had comparable risks of acute and chronic GVHD. Compared with methotrexate, cyclosporine was associated with less interstitial pneumonia (relative risk [RR] = 0.6; P < .001), less treatment-related mortality (RR = 0.6; P < .001), more relapses (RR = 1.6; P < .05), and less treatment failure (relapse or death from any cause; RR = 0.7; P < .001). Different effects were observed in different leukemias. In ALL, the rate of leukemia relapse was increased with cyclosporine versus methotrexate, with no effect on other outcomes. In AML and CML, interstitial pneumonia, treatment-related mortality, and treatment failures were decreased with cyclosporine, with no increase in relapse. Similar analyses comparing cyclosporine plus methotrexate with cyclosporine alone showed that adults receiving the combination had less acute GVHD (RR = 0.5; P < .001), less chronic GVHD (RR = 0.7; P < .01), and less interstitial pneumonia (RR = 0.7; P < .001). Treatment failure (RR = 0.8; P < .05) was marginally reduced. Separate analyses in ALL and AML showed less acute GVHD with combined therapy, but no significant effect on other outcomes. In CML, acute GVHD, interstitial pneumonia, treatment-related mortality, and treatment failure were decreased with combined therapy.
Transplant outcome was analyzed in 690 recipients of bone marrow transplants (BMTs) for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first (n = 299) or second remission (n = 391). Actuarial 5-year leukemia-free survival was 42% +/- 9% (95% confidence interval) and 26% +/- 6%, respectively; relapse rates were 29% +/- 9% and 52% +/- 8%, respectively. Five-year leukemia-free survival was 56% +/- 18% in children and 39% +/- 10% in adults (P less than .02) transplanted in first remission. In first-remission adults, non-T-cell phenotype, male to female donor-recipient sex-match and graft-v-host disease (GVHD) were associated with decreased leukemia-free survival; inclusion of corticosteroids in the regimen to prevent GVHD was associated with increased leukemia-free survival. Variables associated with decreased leukemia-free survival after second-remission transplants were age greater than or equal to 16 years and relapse occurring while on therapy. Variables associated with increased probability of relapse were similar for first- and second-remission transplants and included GVHD prophylaxis without methotrexate and absence of GVHD. In first- remission transplants, leukocyte count greater than or equal to 50 x 10(9)/L at diagnosis was also associated with increased relapse; in second remission, relapse while receiving chemotherapy was also associated with increased posttransplant relapse. These data emphasize the importance of both disease- and transplant-related variables in predicting outcome after BMT. They may be used to explain differences between studies, design future trials, and identify persons most likely to benefit from BMT.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.