The main objectives of the experiment were: 1) to compare bacterial populations of mastitis-causing organisms on the teats of lactating dairy cattle housed on sand and sawdust bedding and, 2) to examine the relationship between bacterial counts present in the 2 bedding types with those on teat ends. Sixteen lactating Holstein cows were housed on either sand or sawdust-bedded free stalls using a crossover design with 3 wk per bedding type. Bedding samples were collected on d 0 (prior to animals lying on the bedding), 1, 2, and 6. Teat ends were sampled prior to the morning milking on d 1, 2, and 6. All samples were analyzed to determine coliform, Klebsiella spp., and Streptococcus spp. populations. There were 2 times more coliforms and 6 times more Klebsiella bacteria on teat ends of cows housed on sawdust compared with those housed on sand. In contrast, there were 10 times more Streptococcus spp. bacteria on teat ends of cows when housed on sand compared with sawdust. In both sawdust and sand bedding, coliforms, Klebsiella and Streptococcus counts increased over each experimental week, although patterns varied with bedding and bacteria type. Bacterial counts on teat ends were correlated with bacterial counts in sawdust (r = 0.47, 0.69, and 0.60 for coliforms, Klebsiella spp., and streptococci, respectively) and in sand (r = 0.35 for coliforms and r = 0.40 for Klebsiella spp.). In conclusion, coliforms and Klebsiella spp. on teat ends were more numerous when cows were housed on sawdust bedding, but Streptococcus spp. were more numerous on teat ends of cows housed on sand.

Eight lactating Holstein cows, four with ruminal cannulas, were used in a duplicated 4 x 4 Latin square design to investigate a fibrolytic enzyme product characterized by xylanase and cellulase activities (Promote N.E.T. Agribrands International, St. Louis, MO). The diet consisted of concentrate containing rolled barley and supplement, barley silage and alfalfa haylage (55% to 45% DM basis, forage to concentrate ratio) and differed in enzyme application: 1) control, 2) enzyme applied to concentrate (45% of TMR), 3) enzyme applied to supplement (4% of TMR), and 4) enzyme applied to premix (0.2% of TMR). All diets that were supplemented with the enzyme product delivered about 1.0 grams per cow per day. Digestibility of OM, NDF and ADF in the total tract was increased in comparison to the control when enzymes were added to the entire concentrate. Enzyme treatments that were applied to a smaller portion of the diet showed only numerical increases in digestibility over the control. However, there was an increase in microbial N synthesis for cows fed enzymes added to the premix. The effects of enzyme supplementation on milk production and composition were not statistically significant, but cows receiving the enzyme product added to the concentrate had a numerically higher FCM compared to the control cows. These results indicate that enzyme supplementation increases total tract digestibility of organic matter and fiber. The proportion of the diet to which the enzyme is applied must be maximized to ensure a beneficial response.

A study was carried out to determine whether the addition of rumen-protected Lys and Met to ration formulations allowed a reduction in dietary crude protein (CP) without jeopardizing total milk or milk protein yields. Eighteen multiparous Holstein cows were randomly assigned to treatment sequences in a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square design. Total mixed rations were balanced according to degradation and rates of passage of protein and carbohydrates using the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System. Rations differed in percentages of CP (18.3, 16.7, and 15.3% for rations 1, 2, and 3, respectively), but energy was held constant. Rations 2 and 3 were supplemented with rumen-protected Lys and Met. Milk, blood, and rumen fluid samples were taken during the 2nd and 3rd wk of each 28-d experimental period. Total collection of urine and feces occurred during the last 5 d of each experimental period. Cows fed ration 1 had a higher milk yield (34.2 vs. 32.8 kg/d) and DMI than did cows fed rations 2 or 3, but milk protein output was not different among groups. Nitrogen efficiency, milk N as a percentage of intake N, improved as percentages of CP in the rations were reduced. Blood urea N values were 15.9, 12.9, and 10.0 mg/dl for cows fed rations 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Apparent digestibilities of CP and urinary N excretion decreased as the percentages of CP in the rations decreased. Results indicated that it is possible to make more efficient use of CP by using rumen-protected amino acids. This procedure may result in less than maximum milk yield, but milk protein output can be maintained.

No abstract

Four multiparous and four primiparous lactating dairy cows fitted with ruminal cannulas were used in a duplicated 4 x 4 Latin square design to study the effects of parity and inclusion of a fibrolytic enzyme product (Agribrands International, St. Louis, MO) on feeding and chewing behavior, salivation, and ruminal pH. Diets consisting of rolled barley, barley silage, and alfalfa haylage (55% forage, DM basis) differed in enzyme application: 1) control, 2) enzyme applied to concentrate (45% of TMR), 3) enzyme applied to supplement (4% of TMR), and enzyme applied to a premix (0.2% of TMR). Enzyme supplementation did not alter daily time spent eating or ruminating, but when enzymes were added to the ration daily, saliva production increased, with no difference among enzyme application treatments. Multiparous cows consumed a greater amount of feed, but spent a similar amount of time eating, compared to primiparous cows. Primiparous cows had shorter ruminating episodes, resulting in lower daily ruminating time compared with multiparous cows. Primiparous cows had lower daily saliva output compared with multiparous cows. These results indicate that application of this fibrolytic enzyme product did not alter the physical structure of the feed, as measured by feeding and chewing variables. The increase in total saliva production observed in cows fed enzyme-supplemented diets may be attributed to a physiological response to compensate for the increase in fermentation products during digestion. The increased intake for multiparous cows is attributed to increased eating rate and not to increased time spent eating. The higher DMI of multiparous cows resulted in increased rumination time needed to process the additional feed and increased salivation to buffer the greater production of VFA.