2004
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(04)73322-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bacterial Populations on Teat Ends of Dairy Cows Housed in Free Stalls and Bedded with Either Sand or Sawdust

Abstract: The main objectives of the experiment were: 1) to compare bacterial populations of mastitis-causing organisms on the teats of lactating dairy cattle housed on sand and sawdust bedding and, 2) to examine the relationship between bacterial counts present in the 2 bedding types with those on teat ends. Sixteen lactating Holstein cows were housed on either sand or sawdust-bedded free stalls using a crossover design with 3 wk per bedding type. Bedding samples were collected on d 0 (prior to animals lying on the bed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
161
3
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(197 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
14
161
3
11
Order By: Relevance
“…RAPD type C was also isolated from a milking machine liner after milking of cows that did not shed K. pneumoniae at detectable levels. The same was true for RAPD type H. In our opinion, contamination of the liner with fecal matter or bedding material, either directly or via contamination on teat skin of the cows that were milked (17,37), is the most likely explanation for this observation. An oral-fecal transmission cycle has been suggested for K. pneumoniae in dairy herds, with fecal shedding resulting in the contamination of feed and water and subsequent reingestion of the organism, resulting in renewed fecal shedding (21).…”
Section: Vol 45 2007mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…RAPD type C was also isolated from a milking machine liner after milking of cows that did not shed K. pneumoniae at detectable levels. The same was true for RAPD type H. In our opinion, contamination of the liner with fecal matter or bedding material, either directly or via contamination on teat skin of the cows that were milked (17,37), is the most likely explanation for this observation. An oral-fecal transmission cycle has been suggested for K. pneumoniae in dairy herds, with fecal shedding resulting in the contamination of feed and water and subsequent reingestion of the organism, resulting in renewed fecal shedding (21).…”
Section: Vol 45 2007mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…), and during year 2 approximately every 2.5 weeks (17 6 3.3 days). Previously published scoring systems use complex measurements (Hickey et al, 2002) or require the use of equipment while cattle are restrained (Zdanowicz et al, 2004;De Palo et al, 2006). Due to the large number of animals in this study, and in order to avoid movement of the cows to a holding area, a scoring system was developed that facilitated rapid assessment of the hygiene of unrestrained cows.…”
Section: Animal Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New bedding material is added systematically and after periods as long as 1 year, the bedding can be entirely replaced and used as fertilizer (Barberg, Endres, & Janni, 2007;Janni et al, 2007). Tucker, Weary, & von Keyserlingk, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%