No abstract

The purpose of this research was to examine the relationship between students' interests, their use of certain specific learning strategies and causal attributions which they made for their academic achievement. In this manner, we attempted to explore the relationships between some important variables from three different, but connected phases of self-regulated learning: the forethought phase (interests), the performance control phase (learning strategies) and the self-reflective phase (causal attributions).Results confirmed the presumption that learning strategies could be a potential mediator in the relationship between students' interests and their academic achievement. Also, results indicate that the causal dimension of controllability could have a partial mediating role between students' academic achievement and their interests. Generally, our findings indicate a dynamic and cyclical nature of learning processinterest is an integral part of this process and it could be conceptualized as both a consequence and an antecedent of cognitive aspects of learning. their learning goals. Self-regulated students are those who are metacognitively, motivationally and behaviorally active participants in their own learning process (Zimmerman, 2001).

No abstract

The goals of this research were to explore emotion-regulation strategies typically used by teachers in their workplace and to operationalize them in a conceptually meaningful and psychometrically sound way. Based on the assumptions of the process model of emotion regulation and a series of three empirical studies (N1 = 25, N2 = 611, N3 = 309), and by implementing the mixed-method approach, a context-specific scale aimed at measuring five distinct emotion-regulation strategies, namely avoiding situations, active modification strategy, reappraisal, suppression, and tension reduction, was developed. All scales had adequate psychometric characteristics and were meaningfully related to the external variables examined.

No abstract

Previous research has suggested that higher levels of teachers’ self-efficacy (TSE) tend to be positively related to positive teachers’ emotions (e.g., joy, pride) and negatively to negative teachers” emotions (e.g., anger, anxiety). However, these studies predominately relied on cross-sectional design and therefore were unable to test the reciprocal relations between the two constructs. Based on the propositions of social-cognitive theory ( Bandura, 1997 ), TSE may be viewed as an antecedent or as a consequence of emotions. More specifically, TSE may shape emotions since it directs teachers’ attentional, appraisal, and regulatory processes, while emotions may shape TSE since they act as a source of information about teachers’ performance in a given task (i.e., emotions can serve as a filter that determines which efficacy information is seen as salient and how it is interpreted). To test these assumptions, an initial sample of 3010 Croatian teachers (82% female) participated in a longitudinal study based on a full panel design with three measurement points and time lags of approximately 6 months. Teachers taught at different educational levels (i.e., elementary, middle, and secondary schools) and had on average 15.30 years ( SD = 10.50) of teaching experience. They completed self-report measures that assessed their self-efficacy beliefs and six discrete emotions experienced in relation to teaching and students – joy, pride, love, anger, hopelessness, and exhaustion. An autoregressive cross-lagged analysis showed that teachers’ emotions and TSE are indeed related to each other. However, the direction of this association is not bidirectional as was suggested by theoretical assumptions; instead, it is asymmetrical – higher levels of TSE beliefs predicted higher levels of positive emotions of joy and pride, while higher levels of teachers’ negative emotions of anger, exhaustion, and hopelessness predicted lower levels of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs.

No abstract

No abstract