Patients with COVID-19, especially those admitted to intensive care units (ICU), are at high thrombotic risk. [1][2][3] Thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 is multifactorial and may result from a hypercoagulable state due to endothelial damage, hypoxic injury, cytokine release, inflammatory cell infiltration, and increased platelet activity. 4

No abstract

Background Granulocyte-monocyte apheresis has been proposed for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, although it is limited by costs and variability of results. Aim To assess effectiveness of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis in patients with steroid-dependent, azathioprine-intolerant/resistant moderate ulcerative colitis. Methods Consecutive patients fulfilling inclusion criteria were prospectively enrolled, treated by apheresis, and followed up for 12 months. The primary end point of the study was steroid-free clinical remission at 12 months, with no need for biologic therapy or surgery. Results From January to December 2013, 33 patients were enrolled. After one year of follow-up, 12 (36%) patients had clinical remission, were steroid-free, and had no need for biological therapy or surgery; 3 (9%) cases showed a clinical response (but not clinical remission). Moreover, 12 (36%) patients required biologic therapy, 4 (12%) underwent colectomy, and in the other 2 (6%) a reduction, but not withdrawal, of steroid dose was achieved. Conclusions Our study shows that a standard course of granulocyte-monocyte apheresis is associated with a 36% steroid-free clinical remission in patients with steroid-dependent, azathioprine-intolerant or resistant moderate ulcerative colitis. Apheresis might represent an alternative to biologic therapy or surgery in this specific subgroup of patients. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrial.gov NCT03189888.

No abstract

Background: Patients with severe COVID-19 disease frequently develop anaemia as the result of multiple mechanisms and often receive transfusions. The aims of this study were to assess the impact of repeated blood samplings on patients' anaemic state using standard-volume tubes, in comparison with the hypothetical use of low-volume tubes and to evaluate the transfusion policy adopted. Study design and methods: Transfusion data of mechanically ventilated non-bleeding patients with COVID-19 disease hospitalized in ICU for a minimum of 20 days were recorded. The total volume of blood drawn for samplings with standard-volume tubes and the corresponding red blood cell mass (RBCM) removed during hospitalization for each patient were calculated and compared with the hypothetical use of low-volume tubes. Results: Twenty-four patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Ten patients were anaemic at ICU admission (41.7 %). Overall, 6658 sampling tubes were employed, for a total of 16,786 mL of blood. The median RBCM subtracted by blood samplings per patient accounted for about one third of the total patients' RBCM decrease until discharge. The use of low-volume tubes would have led to a median saving of about one third of the drawn RBCM. Eleven patients were transfused (45.8 %) at a mean Hb value of 7.7 (± 0.5) g/dL. Conclusion:The amount of blood drawn for sampling has a significant role in the development of anaemia and the use of low-volume tubes could minimize the problem. Large high-powered studies are warranted to assess the more appropriate transfusion thresholds in non-bleeding critically ill patients with COVID-19 disease.