Objetivo: compreender os sentimentos que envolvem uma nova gravidez após o nascimento de um bebê malformado. Método: estudo descritivo e qualitativo, apoiado no método narrativa de vida, com dez mulheres que decidiram engravidar após a experiência prévia de malformação congênita. Os dados foram coletados por meio de entrevistas no primeiro semestre de 2019, em uma maternidade do Rio de Janeiro, e submetidos à técnica de análise temática, com a devida aprovação pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa. Resultados: os principais sentimentos externados foram medo, desespero e rejeição, mas o desejo de maternar, e não somente gestar e parir, impulsionou as participantes a engravidar novamente. Conclusão: o planejamento reprodutivo é fundamental para desmistificar sentimentos negativos relacionados à malformação fetal e trazer boas expectativas para nova gestação.
Objective: to understand the repercussions of the fetus malformation diagnosis in the life of pregnant women, under the light of Betty Neuman’s theory. Methods: qualitative study, based on Betty Neuman’s theory. The semistructured interview included ten women pregnant with malformed fetuses hospitalized in a maternity hospital specialized in fetal risk. The thematic analysis technique was used, respecting all ethical aspects. Results: the way in which the malformation is communicated, the lack of empathy from professionals, the lack of information, being alone, fearing judgment, and feeling guilty led to emotional alterations and changes in the projects of the pregnant women. The family, specialized care, and religiosity contributed for the balance of the participants. Conclusion: Neuman’s theory allowed us to recognize stressing factors that shook the lines of defense of the pregnant women, leading to fragilities which are overcome by specialized care and by a support network.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.