The movement away from a vesicocentric way of thinking to a more corticocentric mode of thinking along with new imaging modalities that can look at the brain and examine it as it works will be of great value for determining future treatments. Medications generated from these evidence based studies will hopefully treat the underlying disease process and not just the symptoms.
Objective To combine and analyse the results from centres with a large experience of laparoscopy for the impalpable testis with small series, to determine the expected success rate for laparoscopic orchidopexy. Methods A questionnaire was distributed to participating paediatric urologists; each contributor retrospectively reviewed the clinical charts for their cases of therapeutic laparoscopy for an impalpable testis, detailing 36 variables for each patient. The data were collated centrally into a computerized database. For inclusion, the testis was intra-abdominal (including 'peeping' at the internal ring) at laparoscopic examination, was not managed through an open approach and did not undergo orchidectomy. Three surgical groups were assessed, with success defined as lack of atrophy and intrascrotal position: group 1, primary laparoscopic orchidopexy; group 2, a onestage Fowler-Stephens (F-S) orchidopexy; and group 3, a two-stage F-S orchidopexy. Results Data were gathered from 10 centres in the USA, covering the period 1990-1999; 252 patients representing 310 testes were included and overall, 15.2% were lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between success rates in the larger and smaller series. Atrophy occurred in 2.2% of 178 testes, 22.2% of 27 testes and 10.3% of 58 testes in groups 1-3, respectively. Testes were not in a satisfactory scrotal position in 0.6%, 7.4% and 1.7% of groups 1-3, respectively. The mean follow-up for each group was 7.7, 8.6 and 20.0 months, respectively. The overall success for all groups was 92.8% (97.2% group 1; 74.1% group 2; 87.9% group 3), with an atrophy rate of 6.1%. Conclusion Laparoscopic orchidopexy for the intraabdominal testis, in both large and small series, can be expected to have a success rate higher than that historically ascribed to open orchidopexy. Within this series, single-stage F-S laparoscopic orchidopexy resulted in a significantly higher atrophy rate than the two-stage repair. However, when considering both F-S approaches, the laparoscopic approach gave greater success than previously reported for the same open approaches. Despite the weaknesses inherent in a retrospective unrandomized study, we conclude that laparoscopic orchidopexy is, if not the procedure of choice, an acceptable and successful approach to the impalpable undescended testicle.
This document should be used as a basis for appropriate evaluation and timely surveillance of the various neuro-urologic conditions that affect children.
The gross and microscopic effects of four common modes of ureteral dilation and ureteroscopy were examined in 26 renoureteral units in 13 minipigs. Acutely, ureters subjected to mechanical (bougie, Teflon, or balloon) ureteral dilation and ureteropyeloscopy (UPS) demonstrated active mucosal bleeding with multiple sites of perforation, whereas ureters subjected to hydraulic dilation and UPS were significantly less traumatized. Two weeks after mechanical ureteral dilation and UPS, 3 of 6 ureters were obstructed radiographically, whereas all 7 hydraulically dilated ureters were unobstructed. By 6 weeks, all radiographic evidence of obstruction had resolved in the mechanically dilated group. While 5 of 6 mechanically dilated ureters showed extensive scarring with muscle loss 4 to 6 weeks after dilation, no scarring was seen in those ureters dilated hydraulically. Renal pelvic pressure (RPP) was measured continuously with a nephrostomy catheter in vivo during (bougie, Teflon, balloon and hydraulic) ureteral dilation and UPS. Renal pelvic pressure during rigid ureteroscopy approximated the resting pelvic pressure plus the irrigant height above the kidney or set pressure on a hydraulic pump, plus a "scope effect" which was characterized by a 20 to 25 mm. Hg increase in RPP produced by moving the endoscope in the ureter without flow. The effects on RPP of continuous bladder drainage with a uretheral catheter and renal pelvic decompression with an open-ended ureteral catheter passed into the renal pelvis through the ureteroscope working channel were also examined. The maximum RPP was evaluated in vitro in a separate group of 16 freshly harvested pig kidneys of similar weight examined immediately after sacrifice and was found to be 439 mm. Hg. We also studied the immediate and long-term effects of low (< 120 cm. H2O or 90 mm. Hg) versus high (> 200 cm. H2O or 150 mm. Hg) RPP on renal histology. Acutely, high pressure caused diffuse denudation and flattening of the caliceal urothelium, submucosal edema and congestion not seen in calyces subjected to low irrigant pressure. Four to six weeks later, there was a higher incidence of columnar metaplasia, subepithelial nests and pericalyceal vasculitis in calyces subjected to high pressure as compared with those subjected to low irrigant pressure. Acutely, renal tubules subjected to high irrigant pressure demonstrated marked vacuolization and degeneration, whereas tubules subjected to low pressure appeared normal. At 4 to 6 weeks, focal scarring was seen in 5 of 7 kidneys subjected to high irrigant pressure, whereas no scarring was noted in all 6 kidneys subjected to low irrigant pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Robotic assisted and laparoscopic anastomosis produced similar outcomes in pediatric patients who underwent pyeloplasty. Overall operative times did not vary significantly between the 2 procedures. There appeared to be no quantifiable benefits between the 2 procedures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.