Background: Premarital sexual behavior is a multidimensional problem, which is influenced by various factors, one of them is school. The majority of adolescents engage in risky sexual behavior the first time when they are in high school, namely at the age of 15-18 years. The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of schools on unsafe sexual behavior in high school students in Boyolal, Central Java. Subjects and Method: This was a cross sectional study conducted in senior high schools in Boyolali, Central Java, from October to November 2018. A total of 200 students was selected by cluster random sampling. The dependent variable was unsafe sexual behavior. The independent variables were knowledge, attitude, self-efficacy, understanding of region, parental supervision, access to information, and subjective norm. The data were collected using questionnaire and data were analyzed using multilevel logistic regression. Results: Premarital sexual behavior decreased with high knowledge (b= -3.33; 95% CI= -5.88 to -0.79; p= 0.010), positive attitude (b= -5.16; 95% CI= -8.63 to -1.70; p= 0.004), strong self-efficacy (b = -4.65; 95% CI = -7.37 to -1.94; p = 0.001), good understanding of religion (b= -3.95; 95% CI = -6.82 to -1.10; p= 0.007), strict parental supervision (b= -3.70; 95% CI= -6.60 to -0.80; p= 0.012), good access to information (b = -3.61; 95% CI = -6.10 to -1.12; p = 0.004), and subjective norm (b = -2.43; 95% CI= -4.60 to -0.25; p= 0.029). Schools had negligible contextual effect on premarital sexual behavior with ICC <0.1%. Conclusion: Premarital sexual behavior decreases with high knowledge, positive attitude, strong self-efficacy, good understanding of religion, strict parental supervision, high exposure to information access, and subjective norm. Schools has negligible contextual effect on premarital sexual behavior.
This study aims to describe the conformity of Javanese cultural values in farmer families in Tegaldowo Village, Gunem Subdistrict, Rembang Regency in choosing partners for doughters who first married at an early age by using Family Communication Pattern Theory by Koerner and Fitzpatrick. The research approach uses descriptive qualitative with the case study method through in-depth interviews with 9 families consisting of nucleus and extended family. The results of the study show high conformity to the values of Javanese culture and kinship system. The decision to choose a partner and conduct a marriage is based on the collectivity of group values rather than personal wants and needs
Abstract-By the end of 2014, the trends of creating a better service for citizens had been emerging in Indonesia. Some of the cities started to prepare for being the smart cities. A better service for citizens can be done using some new technologies and innovations, especially internet matter in a smart city. One of the factors for the successful of smart city is mass media. Nowadays, online media has developed rapidly. One of the famous online news portal in Indonesia is kompas online. Using a content analysis, this research analyzed the news about smart city in kompas online, in 2015. The result shows that there are only 38 news about smart city in kompas online in the period of 2015. The majority of the news mentions only two cities, Bandung and Jakarta. However, positive tone of the news were dominating.
Background: COVID-19 has brought fundamental changes to various public sectors, one of which is the implementation of the 2020 simultaneous regional head elections in Indonesia. Objectives: The purpose of this article is to analyze the dynamic capabilities of the KPU from a dynamic governance perspective in the implementation of the 2020 elections in Indonesia. Methods: This article uses data sources from the literature review and secondary data related to the organization of Elections in Indonesia which have been published through social media youtube and the official website of the institutions, namely on DPR, KPU, Ministry of Home Affairs, and BNPB accounts during March-August 2020. Result: KPU's dynamic capabilities in organizing the election are shown with the capacity of thinking ahead, thinking again, and thinking across in response to the threat of the Covid-19 pandemic. Thinking ahead can be seen from the KPU's efforts to place the principle of the safety of organizers and voters in the Election to prevent the emergence of new clusters of the spread of Covid-19. Thinking again is shown by reviewing, revising, and making new policies and programs in the implementation of the 2020 elections. Thinking across is shown by the KPU's willingness to learn from other countries having successfully held Pilkada in the era of the Covid-19 pandemic to be used as a basis for policy innovation formulation.
Bureaucratic reform (BR) has passed phase I (2010-2014), but raises some problem to be solved that are; bureaucracy that has not been completely clean and accountable, bureaucracy that has not been effective and efficient, and public services that have not had the expected quality. Almost seven years of BR has been running and entering period II (2015-2019), but not showing a passable change. Based on the findings of ICW in 2016, corruption figures of Civil Servants reached 47% or 515 people became suspects. During the reform period, ASN was most caught up in corruption, involving 3,417 people. In terms of service quality, the Ombudsman Indonesia received complaints during 2016, of which complained 1,200 agencies about their services. This paper intends to criticize the journey of bureaucratic reform during the phase I and the current period, rated from the dimensions of target achievement indicators and achievements. This article was written based on literature review and secondary data analysis on the phase I of BR report, and data on the achievement of the current year reform report. The data were compared and then analyzed. The BR in the phase I refer to national and global indicators, namely indexes of corruption perception, government effectiveness and competitiveness, and in phase II only refers to national indicators. The results found that the phase I bureaucracy reform has not been able to demonstrate good reform performance since it has not met the target of all indicators. Phase II used indicator is more internally, but not yet measured its success. BR in the phase I and phase II are more reporting and do not touch on the essence of the bureaucracy itself, bureaucratic reform is more of a "reform bureaucratization" and still relies on the approach of reporting in evaluating its success.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.