This study aims to find out the guided inquiry-based acid-base module that have been developed meets the criteria of the National Education Standards Agency (BSNP); learning outcomes increase after being taught using guided inquiry based modules; there is a relationship between student learning outcomes with student metacognition skills. The population was all students of class XI Senior High School Education Foundation Mulia Medan Academic. Class XI Science was chosen as the sample determined by simple random sampling. The research method used is the development research using the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). The research instrument was a learning outcome test, a metacognitive questionnaire taken from the Metacognitive Awareness Inventory (MAI) instrument, and a validation sheets. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive analysis, feasibility analysis, the results of the metacognitive questionnaire, and the results of learning tests. The hypothesis test using the t-test and assisted with the SPSS 19.0. The results of the study showed that the modules were developed according to the criteria of the National Education Standards Agency (BSNP)obtained: content = 3.85; language = 3.89; presentation = 3.83; graphic = 3.87 with valid criteria;tcount is greater than ttable (8.321> 1.708) shows that student chemistry learning outcomes increase after being taught using guided inquiry-based modules; the results of the correlation obtained rcount>rtable(0.472 > 0.388) showed that there is a relationship between metacognition skills and chemistry learning outcomes of students.
Information about score obtained from a test is often interpreted as an indicator of the student's ability level. This is one of the weaknesses of classical analysis that are unable to provide meaningful and fair information. The acquisition of the same score if it comes from a test item with a different level of difficulty, must show different abilities. Analysis of the Rasch model will overcome this weakness. The purpose of this study was to analyze the quality of the items by validating the national chemistry exam instrument using the Rasch model. The research sample was 212 new students of the Department of Chemistry at the State University of Medan. The data collected was in the form of respondent's answer data to the 2013 chemistry UN questions, which amounted to 40 items multiple choice and uses the documentation method. Data analysis technique used the Rasch Model with Ministep software. The results of the analysis show the quality of the Chemistry National Exam (UN) questions is categorized as very good based on the following aspects: unidimension, item fit test, person map item, difficulty test level, person and item reliability. There is one item found to be gender bias, in which men benefit more than women. The average chemistry ability of respondents is above the average level of difficulty of the test items
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.